Unit 7 and Unit 9
You completed your evaluation at 10:44 am EDT on November 01, 2016.
Prepared on November 1, 2016 for:
Tonya Mallory
Tonya Mallory
2
Transformational
Leadership - 5 I's 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3.5
Rewards
Achievement - CR 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3
Monitors Deviations
& Mistakes - MBEA 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3.3
Fights Fires - MBEP 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
0.3
Avoids
Involvement - LF 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
0
Tonya Mallory
3
1. Introduction
2. Full Range Leadership®
3. Making the Most of Your Report
4. Leadership Profile Self Scores
5. Comparison with Norms
6. Your Transformational Leadership
a. Style Strengths
b. Areas for Development
7. Individual Planning and Goal Setting
8. About Using only the Self Form
Tonya Mallory
4
This report reviews your scores on the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire™ Self-Only Form (MLQ Self). The
MLQ measures a full range of leadership styles to achieve optimal outcomes for the organization. The report
provides feedback on how frequently you believe you exhibit various kinds of leadership behaviors.
The MLQ measures leadership styles, which may be grouped under three broad categories. Each category
differs in the nature of the leadership behaviors and their expected outcomes.
Transformational Leadership
Full Range Leadership® Model Style Labels
(Also known as the 5 I's) Builds Trust IIA
(Idealized Influence -- Attributes)
Acts with Integrity IIB
(Idealized Influence -- Behaviors)
Encourages Others IM
(Inspirational Motivation)
Encourages Innovative Thinking IS
(Intellectual Stimulation)
Coaches & Develops People IC
(Individualized Consideration)
Transactional Leadership
Constructive Rewards Achievement CR
(Contingent Reward)
Corrective Monitors Deviations & Mistakes MBEA
(Management-by-Exception: Active)
Passive-Avoidant Behaviors
Passive Fights Fires MBEP
(Management-by-Exception: Passive)
Avoidant Avoids Involvement LF
(Laissez-Faire)
Tonya Mallory
5
Outcomes of Leadership
The MLQ also measures three Outcomes of Leadership. It measures your perception of the behaviors you inspire
in your followers, including:
●
Extra Effort
●
Individual, Unit, and Organizational Effectiveness
●
Satisfaction with the Leadership
This MLQ Report provides feedback for how you perceive your leadership styles. Feedback is first profiled
against researched benchmarks of the optimal frequency for each style. Comparisons are then provided with
universal norms. Be wary when comparing yourself to others - your comparison group may not be optimal in
terms of the best frequency of behaviors for effective leadership in your work context.
The MLQ measures the frequency of nine styles of leadership behavior and outcomes. Eight of the styles
measure behaviors which can be practiced. The ninth style, Builds Trust (IIA), measures your perception of how
your followers think of you (e.g. that you instill pride in others for being associated with them). Each style is
measured by four questions in the MLQ. Each question corresponds to an individual leadership behavior within
that style. A list of your ten highest and lowest frequency leadership behaviors is provided in Section 6 to help
you assess both your perceived strengths and perceived weaknesses.
Tonya Mallory
6
Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership is a process of influencing in which leaders change their associates' awareness of
what is important, and move these associates to see themselves and the opportunities and challenges of their
environment in a new way. Transformational leaders are proactive: they seek to optimize individual, group and
organizational development and innovation -- not to merely perform "at expectations." They convince their
associates to strive for higher levels of potential as well as higher levels of moral and ethical standards.
Builds Trust
(Idealized Influence -- Attributes)
These leaders are able to build trust in their followers. They inspire power and pride in their followers by going
beyond their own individual interests and focusing on the interests of the group.
Instill pride in others for being associated with them
Go beyond self-interest for the good of the group
Act in ways that build others' respect for me
Display a sense of power and confidence
Acts with Integrity
(Idealized Influence -- Behaviors)
These leaders act with integrity. They talk about their most important values and beliefs, they focus on a
desirable vision, and almost always consider the moral and ethical consequences of their actions. They also
focus on building a commonly shared vision or mission for the group.
Talk about their most important values and beliefs
Specify the importance of having a strong sense of purpose
Consider the moral and ethical consequences of decisions
Emphasize the importance of having a collective sense of mission
Encourages Others
(Inspirational Motivation)
These leaders behave in ways that motivate those around them by providing meaning and challenge to
their followers' work. Individual and team spirit is aroused; enthusiasm and optimism are displayed. The
leader encourages followers to envision a better future for the organization, as well as for themselves.
Talk optimistically about the future
Talk enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished
Articulate a compelling vision of the future
Express confidence that goals will be achieved
Tonya Mallory
7
Encourages Innovative Thinking
(Intellectual Stimulation)
These leaders stimulate their followers' efforts to be innovative and creative by questioning assumptions,
reframing problems, and approaching old situations in new ways. There is no ridicule or public criticism of
individual members' mistakes. New ideas and creative solutions to problems are solicited from followers,
who are included in the process of addressing problems and finding solutions.
Re-examine critical assumptions to question whether they are appropriate
Seek differing perspectives when solving problems
Get others to look at problems from many different angles
Suggest new ways of looking at how to complete assignments
Coaches & Develops People
(Individual Consideration)
These leaders pay attention to each individual's need for achievement and growth by acting as a coach or
mentor. Followers are developed to higher levels of potential by creating new learning opportunities in a
supportive climate. Individual differences in needs and desires are recognized.
Spend time teaching and coaching
Treat others as individuals rather than just as a member of the group
Consider each individual as having different needs, abilities, and aspirations from others
Help others to develop their strengths
Tonya Mallory
8
Transactional Leadership
Transactional leaders display behaviors associated with two transaction styles: constructive (Rewards
Achievement) and corrective (Monitors Deviations & Mistakes). Transactional leadership defines expectations
and promotes performance to achieve these levels. Providing rewards for achievement and monitoring deviations
and mistakes are two core behaviors associated with 'management' functions in organizations. (Full-range
leaders use these styles when necessary but focus on using Transformational styles whenever possible.)
Rewards Achievement
(Contingent Reward)
Leaders who frequently reward achievement tend to clarify expectations and offer recognition when goals are
achieved. This should result in individuals and groups achieving expected levels of performance.
Provide others with assistance in exchange for their efforts
Discuss in specific terms who is responsible for achieving performance goals
Make clear what one can expect when performance goals are achieved
Express satisfaction when others meet expectations
Monitors Deviations & Mistakes
(Management-by-Exception: Active)
These leaders specify the standards for compliance, as well as what constitutes ineffective performance, and
may punish followers for being out of compliance with those standards. This style of leadership implies
close-monitoring for deviations, mistakes, and errors, then taking immediate corrective action.
Focus their attention on irregularities, mistakes, exceptions, and deviations from standards
Concentrate their full attention on dealing with mistakes, complaints, and failures
Keep track of all mistakes
Direct their attention toward failures to meet standards
Tonya Mallory
9
Passive/Avoidant Behavior
Another form of leadership is more passive and reactive: this leader does not respond to situations and problems
systematically. Passive leaders avoid specifying agreements, clarifying expectations and providing goals and
standards. This style has a negative effect on desired outcomes. In this regard it is similar to Laissez-Faire styles
- or "no leadership." Both types of behavior have negative impacts on followers and associates. Accordingly, both
styles can be grouped together as Passive/Avoidant Leadership.
Fights Fires
(Management-by-Exception: Passive)
These leaders fight fires in their team or organization -- they wait for a problem to appear before taking
corrective action. In this style, corrective action is most often punitive.
Fail to interfere until problems become serious
Wait for things to go wrong before taking action
Show a firm belief in "if it ain't broken, don't fix it"
Demonstrate that problems must become chronic before taking action
Avoids Involvement
(Laissez-Faire)
These leaders tend to avoid involvement. This leadership style could be easily defined as 'non-leadership.'
These permissive leaders refuse to assume the responsibilities that are part of their position as leaders: they do
not offer enough information to their followers, do not offer feedback, and do not acknowledge or work towards
their followers' satisfaction.
Avoid getting involved when important issues arise
Are absent when needed
Avoid making decisions
Delay responding to urgent questions
Tonya Mallory
10
Outcomes of Leadership
Transformational and Transactional leadership are both related to the success of the group. The following
outcomes (Generates Extra Effort, Is Productive, and Generates Satisfaction) are desired results of leadership.
Numerous scientific studies have shown that these outcomes - and many others such as productivity, innovation
and sales performance - are achieved at the highest levels when Transformational leadership is used.
Generates Extra Effort
(Extra Effort)
These leaders are able to generate extra effort in their followers. Extra effort is defined as the wish of followers
to strive for superior performance by acting beyond their job expectations.
Get others to do more than they are expected to do
Heighten others' desire to succeed
Increase others' willingness to try harder
Is Productive
(Effectiveness)
These leaders are able to be efficient. Efficient leaders effectively represent the group to higher organizational
levels, are efficient in meeting organizational objectives, and generate a higher efficiency in all the domains with
which they are involved.
Are effective in meeting others' job-related needs
Are effective in representing their group to higher authority
Are effective in meeting organizational requirements
Lead a group that is effective
Generates Satisfaction
(Satisfaction with the Leadership)
These leaders are able to generate satisfaction in their followers. These leaders are warm, nurturing, open,
authentic, and honest, with good interpersonal and social skills. They are capable of developing feelings of job
and organizational satisfaction in their followers.
Use methods of leadership that are satisfying
Work with others in a satisfactory way
Tonya Mallory
11
The Overall Model
Fundamental to the Full Range Leadership model is that every leader displays each style to some degree. The
relationship of these styles to effectiveness and activity (passive/active) is shown below. For example, since
Avoids Involvement (LF) is the most passive and least effective style, it should be used the least, whereas the
active and most effective Transformational Leadership style should be used the most. Placement along the
Passive-Active dimension (horizontal axis) is evident in the meaning of the scales; placement along the
Ineffective-Effective dimension (vertical axis) is based on empirical findings.
●
The leader with an optimal profile rarely displays Avoids Involvement (LF) leadership.
●
An optimal profile shows higher frequencies of Fights Fires (MBEP), Monitors Deviations & Mistakes
(MBEA), and Rewards Achievement (CR).
●
The Transformational leadership styles are used most frequently in an optimal leadership profile:
Builds Trust (IIA), Acts with Integrity (IIB), Encourages Others (IM), Encourages Innovative Thinking
(IS), and Coaches & Develops People (IC).
In contrast, the profile of poorly performing leaders tend towards passivity and ineffectiveness.
Research Findings for the MLQ
The MLQ is the most researched measure of leadership (especially Transformational Leadership). It shows
strong validity, reliability, and evidence of prediction of organizational effectiveness. Many researchers have been
involved in this evidence and are adding to the research all the time. For a list of many of these studies go to:
http://www.mindgarden.com/16-multifactor-leadership-questionnaire#horizontalTab5
Tonya Mallory
12
In addition to the MLQ Self, Mind Garden provides a full "360" assessment and report (MLQ 360 Leader's
Report) for reviewing your actual leadership style as perceived by raters/observers. Mind Garden also
offers the MLQ Actual/Ought assessment and report (MLQ Actual/Ought Report), which compares your
perception of your actual leadership behaviors with those you believe you should be using. After taking
the MLQ Self and reviewing this report, you may wish to consider taking the MLQ 360 Leader's Report or
the MLQ Actual/Ought, both available from Mind Garden.
Look through the following suggestions before you begin reading your Leadership Profile. This approach has
been used extensively and proven to be quite powerful. It will speed up your understanding of the information in
this report and help you produce a personalized set of leadership development objectives.
About the Report
You'll find the structure of the MLQ Report listed in the Table of Contents (page 3). Section 2 outlines the Full
Range Leadership Model measured by the MLQ and is important background information. Section 4 presents
your leadership profile using self-ratings of your own behavior. Comparisons with optimal leadership profiles, as
indicated by research studies, are presented in this section. The benchmark bar shows the optimal level for each
leadership style.
In Section 5, your profile is compared with universal norms (a large number of self ratings), and norms for your
organization (if applicable). These enable you to see how your leadership contrasts with other leaders. Effective
leadership as indicated by research (the bars below the graphs) is usually the best benchmark. These dual
benchmarks for assessment -- research-driven as well as aggregate norms -- are some of the strengths of the
MLQ Report.
Section 6 helps you start establishing your own leadership plan - the top ten Transformational leadership
strengths (6a. Style Strengths) are presented as are ten areas for developing your Transformational leadership
(6b. Areas for Development).
The MLQ is an excellent tool for developing a unique leadership development plan. Some general tips are given
in Section 7 (Individual Planning and Goal Setting) to help you make the most of this assessment. These are
generic; the best results are obtained when you work with a leadership coach. A coach can help you to move
between the "big picture" of the initial sections of your MLQ Report and the final "detailed sections" to establish a
specific set of objectives for your development.
The MLQ Leader's Workbook is available as a complement to the MLQ Report. The Workbook provides guidance
for setting your objectives for development.
Tonya Mallory
13
You may notice yourself being challenged by the questions or statements in the MLQ and want to dispute their
importance or meaning. It is important to remember that each question in the MLQ is a validated marker of a full
range of leadership styles. The report may therefore challenge you to question and refine your own implicit
assumptions about leadership. This can be a fruitful area for reflection and discussion with a leadership coach.
When viewing your report for the first time keep in mind the following suggestions:
1. Look through the report when you can focus on it alone.
2. Benchmarks are driven by research studies that show which leadership behaviors are most powerful in achieving
the best outcomes with followers and associates. The benchmark bars represent these research validated levels.
3. Consider the following questions. Note that the questions start by focusing on your leadership strengths as you
perceive them. Look for the good news first!
a) What are my leadership strengths?
(Notice what leadership behaviors were rated high that you already knew were strengths)
b) What are areas where I was surprised to see strengths?
(Focus on leadership behaviors that were rated high but which you had not previously acknowledged as
strengths)
c) In which areas do I need to develop my leadership behaviors?
(Notice leadership behaviors that were rated low and that you could develop)
d) Which specific behavior items do I need to do more frequently?
(Focus on leadership behaviors that are rated low, and that you could practice more frequently)
e) Which specific behavior items do I need to do less frequently?
(Focus on items in the Transactional or Passive/Avoidant scales)
f) In which areas do I see myself as stronger than others might see me?
(Notice leadership behaviors where you rate yourself higher than others might rate you)
4. Consider how you might change your leadership style to become a more effective leader.
g) How can I be a more effective leader with my followers?
h) How can I be a more effective leader with my peers?
i) How can I influence "upwards" more effectively?
(Focus on leadership behaviors you can practice with those at a higher organizational level than you)
j) Which issues really challenge my thinking about my leadership?
Tonya Mallory
14
5. Now focus on the Transformational Leadership sections.
k) What are my strongest Transformational leadership behaviors? How can I leverage those behaviors?
l)
What Transformational leadership behaviors are most important for me to improve my current role in the
organization and the surrounding environment?
6. Transactional: Look at the balance between your positive Rewards Achievement (CR) behaviors and your
Monitors Deviations & Mistakes (MBEA) behaviors. Do you practice Rewards Achievement more frequently
than Monitors Deviations & Mistakes, and if not, why not? Do you rely too much on these Transactional
influencing behaviors when compared with your Transformational influencing skills?
7. Passive/Avoidant: Notice how frequently you believe you engage in Fights Fires (MBEP) and
Avoids Involvement (LF) behaviors.
8. Make some brief answers to the preceding questions and review them with a leadership coach or trusted
colleague. This will help make your feedback review session more effective and speed up the process of
establishing your development plan.
9. A key outcome of your first session with a leadership coach or colleague is to identify both the areas of your
strengths as well as a set of clear objectives for your leadership development. Each objective for improvement
will be deciding "more of this" and "less of that."
10. Consider the whole report and avoid getting locked into just one aspect of it. Your Full Range Leadership
Profile as a whole allows you to improve the effectiveness of your leadership and your corresponding ability to
positively influence others.
Tonya Mallory
15
The bar chart below shows how you rated yourself on leadership behaviors. Use the key below for interpretation:
Frequency
0 = Not at all
1 = Once in awhile
2 = Sometimes
3 = Fairly often
4 = Frequently, if not always
Builds Trust (IIA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
2.8
Acts with Integrity (IIB) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3.8
Encourages Others (IM) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3.3
Encourages Innovative
Thinking (IS) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3.8
Coaches & Develops
People (IC) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3.8
Benchmark*
*According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of all five Transformational behaviors should be a "Fairly Often" rating of 3
or greater.
Tonya Mallory
16
Rewards Achievement (CR) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3
Benchmark*
*According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of Rewards Achievement (CR) behaviors should be between "Sometimes"
and "Fairly Often" (2.0 - 3.0).
Monitors Deviations &
Mistakes (MBEA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
3.3
Benchmark**
**According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of Monitors Deviations & Mistakes (MBEA) behaviors should be between
"Once in awhile" and "Sometimes" (1.0 - 2.0).
Fights Fires (MBEP) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
0.3
Avoids Involvement (LF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
0
Benchmark***
***According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of Passive/Avoidant behaviors should be between "Not at all" and "Once in
awhile" (0 - 1.0).
Generates Extra Effort (EE) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
4
Is Productive (EFF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
4
Generates Satisfaction
(SAT) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Self Rating
4
Benchmark*
*According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the strongest leaders achieve rated frequencies for the above Outcomes of 3.5 or greater.
Tonya Mallory
17
The bar chart below shows how your perceptions of your leadership style compare to various norms for the MLQ.
One norm is always provided - 'Universal Norm'. The Universal norm consists of 3,755 leaders rating themselves
on the MLQ. If available, an aggregate norm from your organization or group will also be reported as "Your
Group." Use the key below for interpretation:
Frequency
0 = Not at all
1 = Once in awhile
2 = Sometimes
3 = Fairly often
4 = Frequently, if not always
Builds Trust (IIA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
2.8
Universal Norm
2.9
Acts with Integrity (IIB) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
3.8
Universal Norm
2.8
Encourages Others (IM) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
3.3
Universal Norm
2.9
Encourages Innovative
Thinking (IS) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
3.8
Universal Norms
2.8
Coaches & Develops
People (IC) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
3.8
Universal Norm
2.9
Tonya Mallory
18
Rewards Achievement (CR) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
3
Universal Norm
2.9
Monitors Deviations &
Mistakes (MBEA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
3.3
Universal Norm
1.7
Fights Fires (MBEP) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
0.3
Universal Norm
1
Avoids Involvement (LF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
0
Universal Norms
0.7
Tonya Mallory
19
Generates Extra Effort (EE) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
4
Universal Norm
2.7
Is Productive (EFF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
4
Universal Norm
3.1
Generates Satisfaction
(SAT) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Score
Your Self Rating
4
Universal Norm
3.1
Tonya Mallory
20
This section lists your perceived Transformational Leadership strengths. These ten items are those for which you
gave yourself the highest frequency ratings.
Score Scale Item
4
Encourages Innovative
Thinking (IS)
I suggest new ways of looking at how to complete assignments.
4
Coaches & Develops
People (IC)
I help others to develop their strengths.
4
Encourages Innovative
Thinking (IS)
I get others to look at problems from many different angles.
4
Coaches & Develops
People (IC)
I consider each individual as having different needs, abilities, and
aspirations from others.
4 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I consider the moral and ethical consequences of decisions.
4
Coaches & Develops
People (IC)
I treat others as individuals rather than just as members of the
group.
4 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I specify the importance of having a strong sense of purpose.
4
Encourages Others
(IM)
I talk optimistically about the future.
4
Encourages Innovative
Thinking (IS)
I seek differing perspectives when solving problems.
4 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I talk about my most important values and beliefs.
Tonya Mallory
21
This section lists Transformational Leadership areas you think you could develop. These ten items are those for
which you gave yourself the lowest frequency ratings.
Score Scale Item
2 Builds Trust (IIA) I instill pride in others for being associated with me.
3
Encourages Innovative
Thinking (IS)
I re-examine critical assumptions to question whether they are
appropriate.
3
Encourages Others
(IM)
I talk enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished.
3
Coaches & Develops
People (IC)
I spend time teaching and coaching.
3 Builds Trust (IIA) I go beyond self-interest for the good of the group.
3 Builds Trust (IIA) I act in ways that build others' respect for me.
3 Builds Trust (IIA) I display a sense of power and confidence.
3
Encourages Others
(IM)
I articulate a compelling vision of the future.
3 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I emphasize the importance of having a collective sense of mission.
3
Encourages Others
(IM)
I express confidence that goals will be achieved.
Tonya Mallory
22
The MLQ Self uncovers where you feel you have strengths and areas for development as determined by
leadership research. The following generic tips are useful in responding to your report and determining a plan for
your future development:
A.
Accept the ratings as a first step in understanding how you perceive the frequency of your leadership
behaviors. These behaviors influence others for better or for worse.
B.
Consider the 'Outcomes of Leadership' relative to your leadership style. Generates Extra Effort (EE) is the
outcome most affected by Transformational behaviors.
C. Compare your ratings with the benchmarks indicated by research.
D.
Develop a plan specifically based on increasing or decreasing your behaviors on particular items in the
MLQ. Pick items which will have the biggest effect on your overall average for a particular style and to
which you can commit.
E.
Where appropriate, share your plan with people who can help you with feedback, suggestions and
encouragement. Consider working with a leadership coach. Routinely seek and review feedback from
these people.
F. Consider setting a time when you can review your progress by repeating the MLQ.
Related Products
In addition to the MLQ Self, Mind Garden provides a full "360" assessment and report (MLQ 360 Leader's Report)
for reviewing your actual leadership style as seen by raters/observers. Mind Garden also provides the MLQ
Actual/Ought assessment and report (MLQ Actual/Ought Report), which compares your perception of your actual
leadership behaviors with those you believe you should be using. After taking the MLQ Self and reviewing this
report, you may wish to consider taking the MLQ 360 or the MLQ Actual/Ought, both available from Mind Garden.
MLQ 360 Leader's Report
http://www.mindgarden.com/multifactor-leadership-questionnaire/54-mlq-360-leaders-report.html
MLQ Actual/Ought Report
http://www.mindgarden.com/multifactor-leadership-questionnaire/230-mlq-actual-ought-report-about-me.html
MLQ Leader's Workbook
http://www.mindgarden.com/multifactor-leadership-questionnaire/548-mlq-leaders-workbook.html
Tonya Mallory
23
A note from MLQ co-author Bruce Avolio
Occasionally it is appropriate to only have a leader rate her or himself, with no rater/observer
feedback. However, there are many reasons to have others rate a leader's leadership behavior. Here
are some important points to consider:
1. The choice of which rater source to use should be tied to the research or developmental question. If you are interested only in how leaders think about or perceive their own
leadership behavior, then collect only self ratings. In every other instance, why not collect
observation data from other sources?
2. Leaders can have unique relationships with peers, followers and other leaders, and the ratings will differ as a consequence of the unique nature of these relationships.
3. Since leadership is in the 'eye of the beholder', why collect data from only the 'self beholder'?
4. There is considerable evidence indicating that self and other ratings often do not agree, for reasons mentioned above.
5. The Self form does not measure actual leadership behavior, rather it measures only the self-perception of leadership.
This is an important question so to expand this, at core, leadership is in the eye of the beholder. Thus,
to the degree that one has only one source, the validity of that source is in question. This is true of
every type of research or assessment instrument, including personality instruments. Thus, if a leader
has 10 followers and you get a rating from just one, it is unlikely that that rating will represent the 9
other views -- especially if that rater has worked for the leader for one month or less. If we get ratings
from peers, that may not generalize to followers. If we get ratings from the leader him/herself, the
question one has to answer is, how representative are those ratings of all other sources? If your
interest is to understand or change the self-perceptions of a leader, then measuring only self ratings is
appropriate. If the goal is to measure leadership behavior then measuring raters'/observers'
perceptions of that leader is the most appropriate.