Unit 7 and Unit 9

profileBabpbuvter253
multifactorleadershipquestionnaireselfformtonyamallory1478009956.pdf

You completed your evaluation at 10:44 am EDT on November 01, 2016.

Prepared on November 1, 2016 for:

Tonya Mallory

Tonya Mallory

2

Transformational

Leadership - 5 I's 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3.5

Rewards

Achievement - CR 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3

Monitors Deviations

& Mistakes - MBEA 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3.3

Fights Fires - MBEP 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    0.3

Avoids

Involvement - LF 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    0

Tonya Mallory

3

1. Introduction

2. Full Range Leadership®

3. Making the Most of Your Report

4. Leadership Profile Self Scores

5. Comparison with Norms

6. Your Transformational Leadership

a. Style Strengths

b. Areas for Development

7. Individual Planning and Goal Setting

8. About Using only the Self Form

Tonya Mallory

4

This report reviews your scores on the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire™ Self-Only Form (MLQ Self). The

MLQ measures a full range of leadership styles to achieve optimal outcomes for the organization. The report

provides feedback on how frequently you believe you exhibit various kinds of leadership behaviors.

The MLQ measures leadership styles, which may be grouped under three broad categories. Each category

differs in the nature of the leadership behaviors and their expected outcomes.

 

Transformational Leadership     

Full Range Leadership® Model Style Labels             

(Also known as the 5 I's)   Builds Trust   IIA

    (Idealized Influence -- Attributes)    

    Acts with Integrity   IIB

    (Idealized Influence -- Behaviors)    

    Encourages Others   IM

    (Inspirational Motivation)    

    Encourages Innovative Thinking   IS

    (Intellectual Stimulation)    

    Coaches & Develops People   IC

    (Individualized Consideration)    

       

Transactional Leadership  

     

Constructive   Rewards Achievement   CR

    (Contingent Reward)    

Corrective   Monitors Deviations & Mistakes   MBEA

    (Management-by-Exception: Active)    

       

Passive-Avoidant Behaviors  

     

Passive   Fights Fires   MBEP

    (Management-by-Exception: Passive)    

Avoidant   Avoids Involvement   LF

   

(Laissez-Faire)    

Tonya Mallory

5

Outcomes of Leadership

The MLQ also measures three Outcomes of Leadership. It measures your perception of the behaviors you inspire

in your followers, including:

Extra Effort

Individual, Unit, and Organizational Effectiveness

Satisfaction with the Leadership

This MLQ Report provides feedback for how you perceive your leadership styles. Feedback is first profiled

against researched benchmarks of the optimal frequency for each style. Comparisons are then provided with

universal norms. Be wary when comparing yourself to others - your comparison group may not be optimal in

terms of the best frequency of behaviors for effective leadership in your work context.

The MLQ measures the frequency of nine styles of leadership behavior and outcomes. Eight of the styles

measure behaviors which can be practiced. The ninth style, Builds Trust (IIA), measures your perception of how

your followers think of you (e.g. that you instill pride in others for being associated with them). Each style is

measured by four questions in the MLQ. Each question corresponds to an individual leadership behavior within

that style. A list of your ten highest and lowest frequency leadership behaviors is provided in Section 6 to help

you assess both your perceived strengths and perceived weaknesses.

Tonya Mallory

6

Transformational Leadership

Transformational leadership is a process of influencing in which leaders change their associates' awareness of

what is important, and move these associates to see themselves and the opportunities and challenges of their

environment in a new way. Transformational leaders are proactive: they seek to optimize individual, group and

organizational development and innovation -- not to merely perform "at expectations." They convince their

associates to strive for higher levels of potential as well as higher levels of moral and ethical standards.

 

Builds Trust

(Idealized Influence -- Attributes)

These leaders are able to build trust in their followers. They inspire power and pride in their followers by going

beyond their own individual interests and focusing on the interests of the group.

Instill pride in others for being associated with them

Go beyond self-interest for the good of the group

Act in ways that build others' respect for me

Display a sense of power and confidence

 

Acts with Integrity

(Idealized Influence -- Behaviors)

These leaders act with integrity. They talk about their most important values and beliefs, they focus on a

desirable vision, and almost always consider the moral and ethical consequences of their actions. They also

focus on building a commonly shared vision or mission for the group.

Talk about their most important values and beliefs

Specify the importance of having a strong sense of purpose

Consider the moral and ethical consequences of decisions

Emphasize the importance of having a collective sense of mission

 

Encourages Others

(Inspirational Motivation)

These leaders behave in ways that motivate those around them by providing meaning and challenge to

their followers' work. Individual and team spirit is aroused; enthusiasm and optimism are displayed. The

leader encourages followers to envision a better future for the organization, as well as for themselves.

Talk optimistically about the future

Talk enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished

Articulate a compelling vision of the future

Express confidence that goals will be achieved

Tonya Mallory

7

 

Encourages Innovative Thinking

(Intellectual Stimulation)

These leaders stimulate their followers' efforts to be innovative and creative by questioning assumptions,

reframing problems, and approaching old situations in new ways. There is no ridicule or public criticism of

individual members' mistakes. New ideas and creative solutions to problems are solicited from followers,

who are included in the process of addressing problems and finding solutions.

Re-examine critical assumptions to question whether they are appropriate

Seek differing perspectives when solving problems

Get others to look at problems from many different angles

Suggest new ways of looking at how to complete assignments

 

Coaches & Develops People

(Individual Consideration)

These leaders pay attention to each individual's need for achievement and growth by acting as a coach or

mentor. Followers are developed to higher levels of potential by creating new learning opportunities in a

supportive climate. Individual differences in needs and desires are recognized.

Spend time teaching and coaching

Treat others as individuals rather than just as a member of the group

Consider each individual as having different needs, abilities, and aspirations from others

Help others to develop their strengths

Tonya Mallory

8

Transactional Leadership

Transactional leaders display behaviors associated with two transaction styles: constructive (Rewards

Achievement) and corrective (Monitors Deviations & Mistakes). Transactional leadership defines expectations

and promotes performance to achieve these levels. Providing rewards for achievement and monitoring deviations

and mistakes are two core behaviors associated with 'management' functions in organizations. (Full-range

leaders use these styles when necessary but focus on using Transformational styles whenever possible.)

 

Rewards Achievement

(Contingent Reward)

Leaders who frequently reward achievement tend to clarify expectations and offer recognition when goals are

achieved. This should result in individuals and groups achieving expected levels of performance.

Provide others with assistance in exchange for their efforts

Discuss in specific terms who is responsible for achieving performance goals

Make clear what one can expect when performance goals are achieved

Express satisfaction when others meet expectations

 

Monitors Deviations & Mistakes

(Management-by-Exception: Active)

These leaders specify the standards for compliance, as well as what constitutes ineffective performance, and

may punish followers for being out of compliance with those standards. This style of leadership implies

close-monitoring for deviations, mistakes, and errors, then taking immediate corrective action.

Focus their attention on irregularities, mistakes, exceptions, and deviations from standards

Concentrate their full attention on dealing with mistakes, complaints, and failures

Keep track of all mistakes

Direct their attention toward failures to meet standards

Tonya Mallory

9

Passive/Avoidant Behavior

Another form of leadership is more passive and reactive: this leader does not respond to situations and problems

systematically. Passive leaders avoid specifying agreements, clarifying expectations and providing goals and

standards. This style has a negative effect on desired outcomes. In this regard it is similar to Laissez-Faire styles

- or "no leadership." Both types of behavior have negative impacts on followers and associates. Accordingly, both

styles can be grouped together as Passive/Avoidant Leadership.

 

Fights Fires

(Management-by-Exception: Passive)

These leaders fight fires in their team or organization -- they wait for a problem to appear before taking

corrective action. In this style, corrective action is most often punitive.

Fail to interfere until problems become serious

Wait for things to go wrong before taking action

Show a firm belief in "if it ain't broken, don't fix it"

Demonstrate that problems must become chronic before taking action

 

Avoids Involvement

(Laissez-Faire)

These leaders tend to avoid involvement. This leadership style could be easily defined as 'non-leadership.'

These permissive leaders refuse to assume the responsibilities that are part of their position as leaders: they do

not offer enough information to their followers, do not offer feedback, and do not acknowledge or work towards

their followers' satisfaction.

Avoid getting involved when important issues arise

Are absent when needed

Avoid making decisions

Delay responding to urgent questions

Tonya Mallory

10

Outcomes of Leadership

Transformational and Transactional leadership are both related to the success of the group. The following

outcomes (Generates Extra Effort, Is Productive, and Generates Satisfaction) are desired results of leadership.

Numerous scientific studies have shown that these outcomes - and many others such as productivity, innovation

and sales performance - are achieved at the highest levels when Transformational leadership is used.

 

Generates Extra Effort

(Extra Effort)

These leaders are able to generate extra effort in their followers. Extra effort is defined as the wish of followers

to strive for superior performance by acting beyond their job expectations.

Get others to do more than they are expected to do

Heighten others' desire to succeed

Increase others' willingness to try harder

 

Is Productive 

(Effectiveness)

These leaders are able to be efficient. Efficient leaders effectively represent the group to higher organizational

levels, are efficient in meeting organizational objectives, and generate a higher efficiency in all the domains with

which they are involved.

Are effective in meeting others' job-related needs

Are effective in representing their group to higher authority

Are effective in meeting organizational requirements

Lead a group that is effective

 

Generates Satisfaction

(Satisfaction with the Leadership)

These leaders are able to generate satisfaction in their followers. These leaders are warm, nurturing, open,

authentic, and honest, with good interpersonal and social skills. They are capable of developing feelings of job

and organizational satisfaction in their followers.

Use methods of leadership that are satisfying

Work with others in a satisfactory way

Tonya Mallory

11

The Overall Model

Fundamental to the Full Range Leadership model is that every leader displays each style to some degree. The

relationship of these styles to effectiveness and activity (passive/active) is shown below. For example, since

Avoids Involvement (LF) is the most passive and least effective style, it should be used the least, whereas the

active and most effective Transformational Leadership style should be used the most. Placement along the

Passive-Active dimension (horizontal axis) is evident in the meaning of the scales; placement along the

Ineffective-Effective dimension (vertical axis) is based on empirical findings.

The leader with an optimal profile rarely displays Avoids Involvement (LF) leadership.

An optimal profile shows higher frequencies of Fights Fires (MBEP), Monitors Deviations & Mistakes

(MBEA), and Rewards Achievement (CR).

The Transformational leadership styles are used most frequently in an optimal leadership profile:

Builds Trust (IIA), Acts with Integrity (IIB), Encourages Others (IM), Encourages Innovative Thinking

(IS), and Coaches & Develops People (IC).

In contrast, the profile of poorly performing leaders tend towards passivity and ineffectiveness.

Research Findings for the MLQ

The MLQ is the most researched measure of leadership (especially Transformational Leadership). It shows

strong validity, reliability, and evidence of prediction of organizational effectiveness. Many researchers have been

involved in this evidence and are adding to the research all the time. For a list of many of these studies go to:

http://www.mindgarden.com/16-multifactor-leadership-questionnaire#horizontalTab5

Tonya Mallory

12

In addition to the MLQ Self, Mind Garden provides a full "360" assessment and report (MLQ 360 Leader's

Report) for reviewing your actual leadership style as perceived by raters/observers. Mind Garden also

offers the MLQ Actual/Ought assessment and report (MLQ Actual/Ought Report), which compares your

perception of your actual leadership behaviors with those you believe you should be using. After taking

the MLQ Self and reviewing this report, you may wish to consider taking the MLQ 360 Leader's Report or

the MLQ Actual/Ought, both available from Mind Garden.

Look through the following suggestions before you begin reading your Leadership Profile. This approach has

been used extensively and proven to be quite powerful. It will speed up your understanding of the information in

this report and help you produce a personalized set of leadership development objectives.

About the Report

You'll find the structure of the MLQ Report listed in the Table of Contents (page 3). Section 2 outlines the Full

Range Leadership Model measured by the MLQ and is important background information. Section 4 presents

your leadership profile using self-ratings of your own behavior. Comparisons with optimal leadership profiles, as

indicated by research studies, are presented in this section. The benchmark bar shows the optimal level for each

leadership style.

In Section 5, your profile is compared with universal norms (a large number of self ratings), and norms for your

organization (if applicable). These enable you to see how your leadership contrasts with other leaders. Effective

leadership as indicated by research (the bars below the graphs) is usually the best benchmark. These dual

benchmarks for assessment -- research-driven as well as aggregate norms -- are some of the strengths of the

MLQ Report.

Section 6 helps you start establishing your own leadership plan - the top ten Transformational leadership

strengths (6a. Style Strengths) are presented as are ten areas for developing your Transformational leadership

(6b. Areas for Development).

The MLQ is an excellent tool for developing a unique leadership development plan. Some general tips are given

in Section 7 (Individual Planning and Goal Setting) to help you make the most of this assessment. These are

generic; the best results are obtained when you work with a leadership coach. A coach can help you to move

between the "big picture" of the initial sections of your MLQ Report and the final "detailed sections" to establish a

specific set of objectives for your development.

The MLQ Leader's Workbook is available as a complement to the MLQ Report. The Workbook provides guidance

for setting your objectives for development.

Tonya Mallory

13

You may notice yourself being challenged by the questions or statements in the MLQ and want to dispute their

importance or meaning. It is important to remember that each question in the MLQ is a validated marker of a full

range of leadership styles. The report may therefore challenge you to question and refine your own implicit

assumptions about leadership. This can be a fruitful area for reflection and discussion with a leadership coach.

When viewing your report for the first time keep in mind the following suggestions:

1.  Look through the report when you can focus on it alone.

 

2.  Benchmarks are driven by research studies that show which leadership behaviors are most powerful in achieving

the best outcomes with followers and associates. The benchmark bars represent these research validated levels.

 

3.  Consider the following questions. Note that the questions start by focusing on your leadership strengths as you

perceive them. Look for the good news first!

 

     a)  What are my leadership strengths?

    (Notice what leadership behaviors were rated high that you already knew were strengths)

 

  b)  What are areas where I was surprised to see strengths?

   

(Focus on leadership behaviors that were rated high but which you had not previously acknowledged as

strengths)

 

  c)  In which areas do I need to develop my leadership behaviors?

    (Notice leadership behaviors that were rated low and that you could develop)

 

  d)  Which specific behavior items do I need to do more frequently?

    (Focus on leadership behaviors that are rated low, and that you could practice more frequently)

 

  e)  Which specific behavior items do I need to do less frequently?

    (Focus on items in the Transactional or Passive/Avoidant scales)

 

  f)  In which areas do I see myself as stronger than others might see me?

    (Notice leadership behaviors where you rate yourself higher than others might rate you)

 

4.  Consider how you might change your leadership style to become a more effective leader.

 

     g)  How can I be a more effective leader with my followers?

 

  h)  How can I be a more effective leader with my peers?

 

  i)  How can I influence "upwards" more effectively?

    (Focus on leadership behaviors you can practice with those at a higher organizational level than you)

 

  j)  Which issues really challenge my thinking about my leadership?

Tonya Mallory

14

 

5.  Now focus on the Transformational Leadership sections.

 

     k)  What are my strongest Transformational leadership behaviors? How can I leverage those behaviors?

 

 

l) 

 

What Transformational leadership behaviors are most important for me to improve my current role in the

organization and the surrounding environment?

 

6.  Transactional: Look at the balance between your positive Rewards Achievement (CR) behaviors and your

Monitors Deviations & Mistakes (MBEA) behaviors. Do you practice Rewards Achievement more frequently

than Monitors Deviations & Mistakes, and if not, why not? Do you rely too much on these Transactional

influencing behaviors when compared with your Transformational influencing skills?

 

7.  Passive/Avoidant: Notice how frequently you believe you engage in Fights Fires (MBEP) and

Avoids Involvement (LF) behaviors.

 

8.  Make some brief answers to the preceding questions and review them with a leadership coach or trusted

colleague. This will help make your feedback review session more effective and speed up the process of

establishing your development plan.

 

9.  A key outcome of your first session with a leadership coach or colleague is to identify both the areas of your

strengths as well as a set of clear objectives for your leadership development. Each objective for improvement

will be deciding "more of this" and "less of that."

 

10.  Consider the whole report and avoid getting locked into just one aspect of it. Your Full Range Leadership

Profile as a whole allows you to improve the effectiveness of your leadership and your corresponding ability to

positively influence others.

Tonya Mallory

15

The bar chart below shows how you rated yourself on leadership behaviors. Use the key below for interpretation:

Frequency

0 = Not at all

1 = Once in awhile

2 = Sometimes

3 = Fairly often

4 = Frequently, if not always

 

 

Builds Trust (IIA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    2.8

Acts with Integrity (IIB) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3.8

Encourages Others (IM) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3.3

Encourages Innovative

Thinking (IS) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3.8

Coaches & Develops

People (IC) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3.8

                                               Benchmark*                                                                                            

*According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of all five Transformational behaviors should be a "Fairly Often" rating of 3

or greater.

Tonya Mallory

16

Rewards Achievement (CR) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3

                                         Benchmark*                                                                          

*According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of Rewards Achievement (CR) behaviors should be between "Sometimes"

and "Fairly Often" (2.0 - 3.0).

Monitors Deviations &

Mistakes (MBEA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    3.3

                                       Benchmark**                                                   

**According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of Monitors Deviations & Mistakes (MBEA) behaviors should be between

"Once in awhile" and "Sometimes" (1.0 - 2.0).

 

Fights Fires (MBEP) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    0.3

Avoids Involvement (LF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    0

                                       Benchmark***                         

***According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the ideal frequency of Passive/Avoidant behaviors should be between "Not at all" and "Once in

awhile" (0 - 1.0).

 

Generates Extra Effort (EE) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    4

Is Productive (EFF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    4

Generates Satisfaction

(SAT) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Self Rating

    4

                                       Benchmark*                                                                                                     

*According to the Research Validated Benchmark, the strongest leaders achieve rated frequencies for the above Outcomes of 3.5 or greater.

Tonya Mallory

17

The bar chart below shows how your perceptions of your leadership style compare to various norms for the MLQ.

One norm is always provided - 'Universal Norm'. The Universal norm consists of 3,755 leaders rating themselves

on the MLQ. If available, an aggregate norm from your organization or group will also be reported as "Your

Group." Use the key below for interpretation:

Frequency

0 = Not at all

1 = Once in awhile

2 = Sometimes

3 = Fairly often

4 = Frequently, if not always

Builds Trust (IIA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    2.8

Universal Norm

    2.9

Acts with Integrity (IIB) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    3.8

Universal Norm

    2.8

Encourages Others (IM) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    3.3

Universal Norm

    2.9

Encourages Innovative

Thinking (IS) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    3.8

Universal Norms

    2.8

Coaches & Develops

People (IC) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    3.8

Universal Norm

    2.9

Tonya Mallory

18

Rewards Achievement (CR) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    3

Universal Norm

    2.9

Monitors Deviations &

Mistakes (MBEA) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    3.3

Universal Norm

    1.7

 

 

Fights Fires (MBEP) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    0.3

Universal Norm

    1

Avoids Involvement (LF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    0

Universal Norms

    0.7

Tonya Mallory

19

Generates Extra Effort (EE) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    4

Universal Norm

    2.7

Is Productive (EFF) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    4

Universal Norm

    3.1

Generates Satisfaction

(SAT) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Score

Your Self Rating

    4

Universal Norm

    3.1

Tonya Mallory

20

This section lists your perceived Transformational Leadership strengths. These ten items are those for which you

gave yourself the highest frequency ratings.

Score Scale Item

4

Encourages Innovative

Thinking (IS)

I suggest new ways of looking at how to complete assignments.

4

Coaches & Develops

People (IC)

I help others to develop their strengths.

4

Encourages Innovative

Thinking (IS)

I get others to look at problems from many different angles.

4

Coaches & Develops

People (IC)

I consider each individual as having different needs, abilities, and

aspirations from others.

4 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I consider the moral and ethical consequences of decisions.

4

Coaches & Develops

People (IC)

I treat others as individuals rather than just as members of the

group.

4 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I specify the importance of having a strong sense of purpose.

4

Encourages Others

(IM)

I talk optimistically about the future.

4

Encourages Innovative

Thinking (IS)

I seek differing perspectives when solving problems.

4 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I talk about my most important values and beliefs.

Tonya Mallory

21

This section lists Transformational Leadership areas you think you could develop. These ten items are those for

which you gave yourself the lowest frequency ratings.

Score Scale Item

2 Builds Trust (IIA) I instill pride in others for being associated with me.

3

Encourages Innovative

Thinking (IS)

I re-examine critical assumptions to question whether they are

appropriate.

3

Encourages Others

(IM)

I talk enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished.

3

Coaches & Develops

People (IC)

I spend time teaching and coaching.

3 Builds Trust (IIA) I go beyond self-interest for the good of the group.

3 Builds Trust (IIA) I act in ways that build others' respect for me.

3 Builds Trust (IIA) I display a sense of power and confidence.

3

Encourages Others

(IM)

I articulate a compelling vision of the future.

3 Acts with Integrity (IIB) I emphasize the importance of having a collective sense of mission.

3

Encourages Others

(IM)

I express confidence that goals will be achieved.

Tonya Mallory

22

The MLQ Self uncovers where you feel you have strengths and areas for development as determined by

leadership research. The following generic tips are useful in responding to your report and determining a plan for

your future development:

 

A.

 

  Accept the ratings as a first step in understanding how you perceive the frequency of your leadership

behaviors. These behaviors influence others for better or for worse.

 

B.

 

  Consider the 'Outcomes of Leadership' relative to your leadership style. Generates Extra Effort (EE) is the

outcome most affected by Transformational behaviors.

 

C.   Compare your ratings with the benchmarks indicated by research.

 

D.

 

 

  Develop a plan specifically based on increasing or decreasing your behaviors on particular items in the

MLQ. Pick items which will have the biggest effect on your overall average for a particular style and to

which you can commit.

 

E.

 

 

  Where appropriate, share your plan with people who can help you with feedback, suggestions and

encouragement. Consider working with a leadership coach. Routinely seek and review feedback from

these people.

 

F.   Consider setting a time when you can review your progress by repeating the MLQ.

 

Related Products

In addition to the MLQ Self, Mind Garden provides a full "360" assessment and report (MLQ 360 Leader's Report)

for reviewing your actual leadership style as seen by raters/observers. Mind Garden also provides the MLQ

Actual/Ought assessment and report (MLQ Actual/Ought Report), which compares your perception of your actual

leadership behaviors with those you believe you should be using. After taking the MLQ Self and reviewing this

report, you may wish to consider taking the MLQ 360 or the MLQ Actual/Ought, both available from Mind Garden.

MLQ 360 Leader's Report

http://www.mindgarden.com/multifactor-leadership-questionnaire/54-mlq-360-leaders-report.html

MLQ Actual/Ought Report

http://www.mindgarden.com/multifactor-leadership-questionnaire/230-mlq-actual-ought-report-about-me.html

MLQ Leader's Workbook

http://www.mindgarden.com/multifactor-leadership-questionnaire/548-mlq-leaders-workbook.html

Tonya Mallory

23

A note from MLQ co-author Bruce Avolio

Occasionally it is appropriate to only have a leader rate her or himself, with no rater/observer

feedback. However, there are many reasons to have others rate a leader's leadership behavior. Here

are some important points to consider:

1. The choice of which rater source to use should be tied to the research or developmental question. If you are interested only in how leaders think about or perceive their own

leadership behavior, then collect only self ratings. In every other instance, why not collect

observation data from other sources?

2. Leaders can have unique relationships with peers, followers and other leaders, and the ratings will differ as a consequence of the unique nature of these relationships.

3. Since leadership is in the 'eye of the beholder', why collect data from only the 'self beholder'?

4. There is considerable evidence indicating that self and other ratings often do not agree, for reasons mentioned above.

5. The Self form does not measure actual leadership behavior, rather it measures only the self-perception of leadership.

This is an important question so to expand this, at core, leadership is in the eye of the beholder. Thus,

to the degree that one has only one source, the validity of that source is in question. This is true of

every type of research or assessment instrument, including personality instruments. Thus, if a leader

has 10 followers and you get a rating from just one, it is unlikely that that rating will represent the 9

other views -- especially if that rater has worked for the leader for one month or less. If we get ratings

from peers, that may not generalize to followers. If we get ratings from the leader him/herself, the

question one has to answer is, how representative are those ratings of all other sources? If your

interest is to understand or change the self-perceptions of a leader, then measuring only self ratings is

appropriate. If the goal is to measure leadership behavior then measuring raters'/observers'

perceptions of that leader is the most appropriate.