Assignment 2

HEAL 1301/Fall 2016-2017/ Mind Map Rubric/Sec 1, 2, 3, 4, 5/Ms. Maimuna Sultana Page 1

HEAL 1301 Basic First Aid

Fall 2016 – 2017

Mind Mapping Total Points:

Note: These 5 points will be included in the final exam marks

Assignment: Make a mind map of Victim Assessment procedures (Chapter 4).

Follow the guidelines given below.

 You can either make it digitally or by hand but submit a hard copy.

 Minimum size : A3

 Be creative in presenting information.

 Content:

 Central theme: Victim Assessment Procedure

 Links / Linking lines: Five branches representing the 5 steps in victim assessment

each in a different color.

 Include appropriate sub branches as required.

 Include appropriate images/graphic illustrations

 Marks will be deducted for late submissions

Refer to the Grading rubric given below.

HEAL 1301/Fall 2016-2017/ Mind Map Rubric/Sec 1, 2, 3, 4, 5/Ms. Maimuna Sultana Page 2

Rubric for Mind Map: Victim Assessment Procedures

CATEGORY Excellent Moderate Unsatisfactory

Arrangement of

Concepts

 Central concept/ image stands out meaningfully

and grasps the key idea

 Main concepts easily identified

 sub-concepts branch appropriately from

main idea

 Central concept/ image present but not clearly

related to key idea

 Main concepts easily identified

 Most sub-concepts branch from main

idea.

 Central concept/ image present but difficult to

separate from other

information

 Main concepts not clearly identified

 sub-concepts don’t consistently branch

from main idea

Links, Linking

Lines / color

 Links connect related terms/point in correct

direction

 Effectively uses color, to meaningfully clarify

connections for all

aspects of mind map

 Most links connect properly

 Obvious attempt is made to use color to

enhance clarity and

memory. Still some

inconsistency of

application

 Links not always pointing in correct

direction

 A little use of color, to illustrate connections between ideas

Content  Shows a solid grasp of all the content covered

 Extensions of the key ideas show a deep

understanding of the

content

 Shows a basic level of coverage of key ideas only

 Attempts extension of a few ideas

 Bare minimum of content covered

 No extension of ideas evident

Graphics  The mind map includes at least 8 relevant

illustrations.

 Graphics (images) used greatly enhance the

topic are creative and

make the mind map

memorable.

 The mind map includes at least 5

relevant illustrations.

 Graphics (images) used appropriately

most of the time; most

graphics selected

enhance the topic and

are of good quality.

 Graphics (images) used inappropriately, poorly

selected and don’t

enhance the topic

 The mind map includes no relevant illustrations

or the illustrations do

not make the mind map

memorable

Design  The mind map is neat and clearly readable

 High visual appeal

 The mind map is somewhat neat but is

clearly readable

 Has visual appeal

 The mind map is not neat and readable

 Mind map does not consistently follow any

format; low in visual

appeal