co-op training report - industrial engineering
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
College of Computer Sciences and Engineering
Systems Engineering Department
ISE351 Cooperative Work
Applying DMAIC Approach on Delayed Shipments, Improving the Work Process System at DOSB Gate, and Documents Handling
Prepared by
Hamad Obaid Al-Harthi
200715490
For Submittal to
Dr. Sayyid Anas Vaqar
(Coop Advisor)
Dr. Samir Al-Amer
(Coop Coordinator)
Abstract
This report describes the coop experience as an International Export Specialist (IES) in Schlumberger. The report demonstrates three main projects: Applying DMAIC approach for delayed shipments and their safety packing, improving the work process at DOSB main gate, and finding efficient designs for documents handling inside material store section. Finally, a number of suggestions and recommendations are provided.
SEPTEMBER 2015
Table of Contents List of Figures 4 List of Tables 5 Acknowledgement 6 CHAPTER 1 7 BACKGROUND ON SCHLUMBERGER AND MY ROLE IN INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS 7 1.1 My Role in SLB: 7 1.2 Logistics 8 1.2.1 Data Sheet of Records 9 1.2.2 Invoice & Packaging List 19 1.2.3 Hubs Locations 21 1.2.4 Aramex Truck Types 24 1.2.5 Three Gateways for Import & Export 28 1.3 Flow Process Chart for Import and Export 29 1.4 DMAIC Approach 31 1.4.1 Problem Statement 31 1.4.2 List of Needs And Objectives 31 1.4.3 Measurement 31 1.4.4 Analysis 32 1.4.5 Improve 36 1.4.6 Control 39 1.5 Packaging Safety 40 CHAPTER 2 43 WORK PROCESS IMPROVEMENT ON DOSB MAIN GATE 43 2.1 Introduction 43 2.2 Objective 43 2.3 Assumptions And Limitations 43 2.4 Scope 44 2.5 Methodology 44 2.6 Analysis 44 2.6.1 Current Situation 44 2.6.2 After Implementation of RFID 49 2.6.3 Barcodes 51 2.7 Comparison & Evaluation 53 2.8 Conclusion And Suggestions 53 2.9 Site View 56 CHAPTER 3 57 DOCUMENTS HANDLING 57 3.1 Current Shelves 57 3.2 Design Objectives & Basic Measurements 58 3.3 Customer Requirements 59 3.4 House of Quality 59 3.5 Alternative Design for Shelves 60 3.6 Alternative Concepts 62 3.7 Evaluation for Alternative Design 63 3.7.1 Criteria Matrix 63 3.7.2 Relative Importance 63 3.7.3 Selection for Preferable Design 64 Conclusion 65 Recommendations 66 References 67
Figure 1: Trade Compliance Policy 8
Figure 2 : Total Freight Cost 17
Figure 3 : Records of The Clients (ARAMCO) 18
Figure 4 : Basis of SLB in KSA 21
Figure 5 : Arabian Gulf Coast Route 22
Figure 6 : Ghuwaifat Custom 22
Figure 8 : Aramex Trailer Type 1 24
Figure 9 : Aramex Trailer Type 2 24
Figure 10 : Aramex European Truck 25
Figure 11 : Aramex Portable Reefer 25
Figure 12 : Aramex Flatbed Truck 1 26
Figure 13 : Aramex Flatbed Truck 2 26
Figure 14 : Loader (Low-Bed) Truck 1 27
Figure 15 : Loader (Low-Bed) Truck 2 27
Figure 16 : Permanent Export Process 29
Figure 17 : Temporary Export Process 30
Figure 18: Fishbone Diagram 32
Figure 19 : Unclear Documents 1 34
Figure 20 : Unclear Documents 2 35
Figure 21 : Reception Flow Process 36
Figure 22 : The Jam Inside The Base (DOSB) 36
Figure 23: Unclear Documents 3 37
Figure 24 : Defective Boxes and Containers 38
Figure 25 : Boxes With Poor Quality 1 40
Figure 26 : Boxes With Poor Quality 2 41
Figure 27 : Drilling & Measurement (D&M) Truck Check List 42
Figure 28: Flow Chart for Current Situation 45
Figure 29: Pareto Chart for Current Situation 47
Figure 30: Pareto Chart for Causes of Delays 47
Figure 31: Fishbone Diagram for Security Weak Performance 49
Figure 32: Flow Chart for RFID 50
Figure 33: Flowchart for Barcode 51
Figure 34: Comparisons in Average Time Between the Current Situation and The Alternatives 53
Figure 35 : Site view of DOSB 56
Figure 36 : Current Shelves 57
Figure 37 : The Way of Storing The Files 58
Figure 38 : House of Quality 59
Figure 39 : Alternative Design for Shelves 60
Figure 40 : The Inside View of The Cube or Box 61
Figure 41 : Information of The File Place 61
List of Tables
Table 1 : Cost by Segments 9
Table 6 : Items Details & Paying Entity Details 11
Table 7 : Paying Entity Details 12
Table 8 : Recharge Details 13
Table 9 : Filters by Geography & Segment 13
Table 10 : Sum of Line Items Costs(USD) 14
Table 11 : Filter Option for Item Costs 1 15
Table 12 : Filter Option for Item Costs 1 15
Table 13 : Filter Option for Item Costs 2 16
Table 14 : T&M Cost by Segment 16
Table 15 : Commercial Invoice 19
Table 16 : Packing List 20
Table 17 : Land Gateways 28
Table 18 : Air Gateways 28
Table 19 : Sea Gateways 28
Table 20 : Time of Delivered Shipments 31
Table 21: Solutions For DOSB Main Gate Delay Time 44
Table 22 : Observations Time for Current Situation 46
Table 23: Continue Observations Time for Current Situation 46
Table 24: Observations Time for RFID 50
Table 25 : Continue Observations Time for RFID 50
Table 26: Time Saved Using RFID 51
Table 27: Observations Time for Barcode 52
Table 28: Continue Observations Time for Barcode 52
Table 29: Time Saved Using Barcode 52
Table 30: ILO PFD Allowance 54
Table 31: Westinghouse System Skill Ratings 55
Table 32 : Design Objectives & Basic Measurements 58
Table 33 : Alternative Concepts 62
Table 34 : Criteria Matrix 63
Table 35 : Relative Importance 63
Table 36 : Selection of The Design 64
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to all who helped me to finish my coop in a perfect way.
Also, I’d like to thank Allah for helping me to achieve up this level and to success in life.
I greatly appreciate the helping and encouragements by Dr. Anas Vaqar, my academic coop advisor to finish this report in the best way.
Also, I’d like express my deepest appreciations to Dr. Samir Al-Amer (Coop Coordinator) & Dr. Nabil Nahas for giving me their golden advices to provide this report in the proper way.
I’d like to thank Mr. Tareq Addi, my Coop supervisor in schlumberger, for giving me the full opportunity to work with the logistics team during my Coop period. Also, I’d like to thank logistics team for their acts & supports as well.
I’d like to thank my family and friends for their moral support which mean a lot for me.
I gained a lot of experience and learnt many things from this experience.
I am lucky that I’m graduating from King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.
Thanks again to all who helped me.
BACKGROUND ON SCHLUMBERGER AND MY ROLE IN INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS
Schlumberger (Slb) is a multinational organization with more than 50,000 employees of 75 nationalities in 100 countries. The two major business segments of Schlumberger Limited are Oilfield Services and Measurement and Systems. Oilfield Services includes Wireline, Testing and Seismic and Drilling and Pumping. Measurement and Systems includes Schlumberger Industries and Schlumberger Technologies. Schlumberger in Saudi Arabia has different locations such as in Kafji, Dhahran and Odhailiah. However, there are two categories of Hubs, one is called Gold hub, which is the main one and other is the regular hub. The Gold hubs are in Husten, Paris, Singapore, Tokyo and Dubai. Also, there are many branches of this company in Middle East area, such as in Bahrain, Oman and Qatar and Jabal Ali (UAE). Schlumberger has principal offices in Paris, Houston, London and The Hague. Revenue was $48.58 billion in 2014. Schlumberger stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, ticker symbol SLB, on the Euronext Paris, Euronext Amsterdam, London and the SIX Swiss stock exchanges. I was working in logistic section in DOSB (Dhahran Oil Service Base) and my job was International Export Specialist (IES) which keeps the record of the shipments and do follow up.
1.1 My Role in SLB:
I was working in logistic section in DOSB (Dhahran Oil Service Base) and my job was International Export Specialist (IES) which keeps the record of the shipments and do follow up. In addition, I was dealing with two different segments D&M (Drilling and Measurement) and testing most of the time by taking the OB (Order Base No.) and executing the commercial invoice and the packing list from the Transportation and Management System. After all, I’ve started the negotiation with our contractor Aramex about shipping cost and lead time. Moreover, I have to follow up the outgoing shipments until arrive the final destiny.
1.2 Logistics
Logistic is one of the best areas to work. The purpose of logistic is to balance the work. We keep the record of the item and track the product until it reaches their destiny. This section is mostly available in all manufacturing and all other seller and buyer companies and in import and export companies.
Figure 1: Trade Compliance Policy
1.2.1 Data Sheet of Records
The following table is a sheet where they kept the record of row labels, also the cost at different months. Row labels are ALS, GSS and DCS and so on. Also the grand total has been calculated as well. We can see that the huge amount has been paid.
Table 1: Cost by Segments
In the following table is a Nub shipment sheet. It has been delivered by air, road courier and sea. This data is made from January to December. By seeing this sheet by road is the popular among others, to send the products.
Table 2: Nub of Shipment
Table 3: Cost by Category
This is also a T&M, which is transportation and management. Here we also have the cost for one year. We can see that we have agent cost, air freight and courier freight and so on. Then we have the grand total.
Table 4: Voucher Details
This is sheet is showing about voucher details. At which date it was issued and what is the voucher ID. Also invoice details, invoice value and invoice ID and so on.
Table 5: Shipment Details
This is sheet is basically about shipment details, where they keep the record of products, such as, TR_number, Gold or Not Gold, shipment number, shipment type, and shipment weight, import or export, destiny and so on.
Table 6: Items Details & Paying Entity Details
In table 6, it is showing us about item details and payment entity details. The one on the left is the item details, where it shows the information about item type, item serial number, item ID, and item description and so on. See the detail
The one on the right is showing about payment entity details, such as, payment entity details, payment ID, paying legal entity, paying legal entity name and so on. See the detail picture of it in table 7.
Table 7: Paying Entity Details
In table 8 we have the record of recharge details, where it keeps the data about recharge flag, recharge ERP ID, and recharge legal entity, recharge legal entity name and so on.
Table 8: Recharge Details
Table 9 is showing about filters by geography and segment. It keeps the data about company, accounting unit, activity code, area, GM, sub GM and SEG and so on.
Table 9: Filters by Geography & Segment
|
Sum of LINE_ITEM_COST_USD |
|
|
|
FF |
Aramex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Row Labels |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
Jun |
July |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nove |
Dec |
Grand total |
|
AGENT / BROKERAGE SERVICES |
56,153.37 |
179,653.39 |
384,071.70 |
402,473.68 |
177,346.54 |
87,324.06 |
67,583.48 |
40,120.60 |
108,368.95 |
64,131.04 |
62,366.00 |
117,739.47 |
1,747,332.29 |
|
AIR FREIGHT |
|
5,819.11 |
26,466.23 |
14,312.87 |
27,436.96 |
50,963.83 |
48,026.87 |
43,465.17 |
131,248.32 |
61,992.32 |
17,508.09 |
121,010.95 |
548,250.72 |
|
COURIER FREIGHT |
|
31,636.06 |
11,890.36 |
1,556.77 |
8,751.06 |
5,250.17 |
11,472.04 |
1,350.84 |
|
15,221.20 |
11,561.39 |
8,331.41 |
107,021.30 |
|
CUSTOMS DUTIES |
278,697.90 |
1,362,466.54 |
2,200,620.60 |
2,001,944.24 |
1,595,819.05 |
983,114.69 |
1,215,971.26 |
472,909.17 |
1,240,431.70 |
1,275,225.16 |
1,183,674.97 |
1,938,582.19 |
15,749,457.47 |
|
DETENTION / DEMURRAGE |
|
17,107.27 |
20,547.36 |
27,244.23 |
86,584.21 |
13,416.76 |
13,042.15 |
17,281.67 |
25,021.26 |
12,133.35 |
36,906.78 |
37,284.82 |
306,569.85 |
|
DETENTION CHARGES |
|
9,642.53 |
6,417.33 |
27,481.60 |
12,930.40 |
2,613.33 |
133.33 |
1,536.00 |
560.00 |
1,306.67 |
1,306.67 |
|
63,927.87 |
|
DOCUMENTATION CHARGES |
|
70,988.29 |
7,221.60 |
78,394.33 |
99,369.27 |
88,205.43 |
14,976.16 |
909.36 |
73,809.85 |
29,234.63 |
(36.03) |
165,944.40 |
629,017.29 |
|
HANDLING &OTHER |
10,195.47 |
71,460.13 |
49,035.27 |
70,724.72 |
59,110.89 |
8,120.49 |
10,689.75 |
3,633.38 |
11,368.03 |
9,775.40 |
112,917.43 |
29,065.87 |
446,096.84 |
|
Road Freight |
73,661.67 |
351,648.36 |
326,553.25 |
347,325.54 |
217,229.65 |
124,199.59 |
106,804.61 |
74,793.70 |
144,509.24 |
53,950.35 |
76,389.13 |
116,224.04 |
2,013,289.12 |
|
SEA Freight |
|
2,900.00 |
101,310.00 |
7,980.00 |
8,449.67 |
5,375.00 |
12,848.00 |
4,632.00 |
8,155.70 |
4,381.33 |
44,976.00 |
(18,071.62) |
182,936.08 |
|
Grand total |
418,708.40 |
2,103,321.69 |
3,134,133.70 |
2,979,437.99 |
2,293,027.70 |
1,368,583.35 |
1,501,547.66 |
660,631.89 |
1,743,473.06 |
1,527,351.45 |
1,547,570.43 |
2,516,111.52 |
21,793,898.83 |
Table 10: Sum of Line Items Costs(USD)
The previous table 10 is showing the information about the NUB by Cost of Aramex Company. We have agent, air freight, courier freight and so on. Also the grand cost has been calculated as well. See table 1.
There is a filter option where it shows the different cost. See the tables below:
Table 11: Filter Option for Item Costs 1
|
FF |
Penalpina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sum of LINE_ITEM_COST_USD |
Column Labels |
|
|
|
Row Labels |
May |
Oct |
Grand Total |
|
AIR FREIGHT |
|
495.00 |
495.00 |
|
SEA Freight |
65,126.54 |
|
65,126.54 |
|
Grand Total |
65,126.54 |
495.00 |
65,621.54 |
Table 12: Filter Option for Item Costs 1
|
FF |
Paragon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sum of LINE_ITEM_COST_USD |
Column Labels |
|
|
|
Row Labels |
Nov |
Dec |
Grand Total |
|
AGENT / BROKERAGE SERVICES |
|
106.67 |
106.67 |
|
AIR FREIGHT |
|
10,126.94 |
10,126.94 |
|
HANDLING &OTHER |
|
70.67 |
70.67 |
|
Road Freight |
|
(10,126.93) |
(10,126.93) |
|
SEA Freight |
8,287.00 |
10,126.94 |
18,413.94 |
|
Grand Total |
8,287.00 |
10,304.29 |
18,591.29 |
Table 13: Filter Option for Item Costs 2
|
TRANSPORT_MODE |
(All) |
|
PAYING_SEGMENT |
(All) |
|
ACCESSORIAL_TYPE |
(Multiple Items) |
Table 14: T&M Cost by Segment
|
Row Labels |
Sum of LINE_ITEM_COST_USD |
|
Abdullah Fouad |
38,506.31 |
|
Aramex |
3,298,448.61 |
|
DHL-DGF |
424,087.33 |
|
Eram |
585,808.17 |
|
Expeditors |
20,291.23 |
|
Fedex |
20,903.47 |
|
Galaxy |
116,019.73 |
|
Panalpina |
24,927.33 |
|
Paragon |
41,953.03 |
|
DHL |
511,171.01 |
|
Grand Total |
5,082,116.22 |
This table 14 shows all the payment for each one of them. As we can see that the freight cost of Aramex is the highest among others. This data is represented graphically, where it shows combination of all the cost. This table is basically showing the T&M cost by segment. See the graph below.
Figure 2: Total Freight Cost
The X-axis is representing the row labels and Y-axis representing the cost. From this graph, we can see clearly that Aramex has the highest cost, which are 3,298,448.61.
Figure 3: Records of The Clients (ARAMCO)
This is ARAMCO excel sheet, where they keep the records of the person. For example, client legal entity, contract expiry date and contract value in US dollars and so on.
1.2.2 Invoice & Packaging List
Table 15: Commercial Invoice
This commercial invoice shows the information about the product when it is sent. They have included shipment form where they write the address, name and phone number, other details, and consignee and many others useful information. See table 15.
Table 16: Packing List
Table 16 shows form which used for packaging list. The information required is shipment ID, report date, total shipment, and total weight and so on. All the necessary information is written in this form, including the ship unit number.
1.2.3 Hubs Locations
Figure 4: Basis of SLB in KSA
This is the map of entry and exit port. The products are sent through causeway and by air to different hubs. Those ones which are circled are the hubs. The causeway is connected with Bahrain. The import /export are done through this causeway.
Figure 5: Arabian Gulf Coast Route
These are the transportation trucks, which transfer products from one place to another. This is an Arabian Gulf coast and this route is used for trading. See figure 5.
Figure 6: Ghuwaifat Custom
Figure 14 show the route connects the UAE and Saudi border at Ghuwaifat. These are the trucks, which are used for transportation.
Figure 7: MI Swaco Base
This is the location of Schlumberger MI Swaco. It is located near the Novatel hotel-Dammam. This picture was taken through Google map. This is another segment for mud engineering. They order some chemicals and explosive shipments form the DOSB (Dahran Oil Service Base).
1.2.4 Aramex Truck Types
There are different types of vehicles which should be available, for example, trucks and trailers that are suitable to carry heavy and different types of goods. There are some common vehicles which are only used for this purpose also in our region. There could be a variation between dimensions and loadable weight. See the figures below.
Figure 8: Aramex Trailer Type 1
Figure 9: Aramex Trailer Type 2
This is a 40’ box trailer. Its length is 12.50m, width 2.40m and height is 1.75m (max height from the ground 4.50 m). Loadable weight is 15-20 tons and level from the ground is 1.30 m.
Figure 10: Aramex European Truck
This is 40’ European truck. Its length is 12.50 m, width is 2.40 m and height is 1.80. Maximum height from the ground is 4.50 m. Loadable weight is 15-20 tons and level from the ground is 1.30 m.
Figure 11: Aramex Portable Reefer
This is reefer (regular) truck. Its length is 11.00-11.20 m. Width this 2.20 m, height 1.80-2.00 m. Loadable weight is 15 tons and Controlled temperature is -20 /-30 degrees Celsius. See figure 19.
Figure 12: Aramex Flatbed Truck 1
Figure 13: Aramex Flatbed Truck 2
This is a flatbed truck, with length of 12.50 m, width 2.40 m and height 1.75 m. Maximum height from the ground is 4.50 m. loadable weight is 15-520 tons and level from the ground is 1.30 m. see figure 12and 13.
Figure 14: Loader (Low-Bed) Truck 1
Figure 15: Loader (Low-Bed) Truck 2
This is a loader (low-bed) truck. Its length is 12.50 m to 30.00 m. width 2.40 m up to 4.00m and height is 1.75m. Maximum height from the ground is 4.50 m. loadable weight is 20 tons up to 150 tons and level from the ground is 0.80-0.90 m. See figure14 and 15.
1.2.5 Three Gateways for Import & Export
LAND:
Table 17: Land Gateways
|
Border |
Gateway Name |
Days of operation |
|
Bahrain |
King Fahd Causeway |
Saturday-Thursday |
|
Kuwait |
Khafji |
Saturday-Thursday |
|
Qatar |
Salwa |
Daily |
|
UAE |
Batha (also supports Oman) |
Saturday-Thursday |
|
Jordan |
Hadeetha |
Saturday-Thursday |
|
Yemen |
Tiwal |
Saturday-Thursday |
|
Egypt |
Dhiba (ferry port) |
Saturday-Thursday |
AIR
Table 18: Air Gateways
|
Location |
Gateway Name |
Days of operation |
|
Dammam |
King Fahd International Airport |
Saturday-Thursday |
|
Bahrain |
Bahrain International Airport |
Daily |
SEA
Table 19: Sea Gateways
|
Location |
Gateway Name |
Days of operation |
|
Dammam |
King Abdul Aziz Port |
Saturday-Thursday |
|
Bahrain |
Khalifa Bin Salman Port |
Daily |
1.3 Flow Process Chart for Import and Export
Figure 16: Permanent Export Process
This is a permanent flow process chart. This scenario used to export assets and equipment, which are loaned and required on urgent basis. The nonrefundable customs are paid to the customs authority in this case. There are some requirements, which are: Commercial Invoice (CI), Certificate of Origin (CO) and Packaging List (PL). Generally, if the cost of the tool is ≥ $20,000 move the shipment as permanent. However, there are some delays, which will be discussed later in the report.
Figure 17: Temporary Export Process
This is a temporary export process chart. In this scenario, the approval of customs management is to be done, when exporting the loan out assets. However, for a set of usually one year, which is 12 months. If we discuss about the general requirements, these are serial number and the country’s origin. This must be visible all the time permanently marked to bottom or surface of each product. Then customs do the visual inspection to match the details, which are written on the invoice. One more thing the products are temporary exported on a single commercial invoice and. In case of re-export, the tool (shipment) must return from the same gateway. For example, any temporary re-export shipment going from KSA to UAE through Ghwaifat border must return from the same gateway. However, there is custom duty about 5% of the total cost of the tool.
1.4 DMAIC Approach
1.4.1 Problem Statement
The problem is the delay of the shipment. There is a certain time that supplier has to deliver. After that he will be late because the registration system will not accept late shipments unless there is approval from the dispatcher office.
1.4.2 List of Needs And Objectives
· The shipments are arrived on time (maximum time to deliver is from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m.).
· Insure that the safety and the quality of the shipments are fine.
1.4.3 Measurement
Table 20: Time of Delivered Shipments
|
Delivered time |
7:30
|
8:00 |
9:00 |
7:15 |
7:50 |
7:00 |
10:00 |
9:05 |
8:00 |
7:00 |
10:10 |
|
|
8:01 |
8:20 |
10:05 |
9:00 |
10:00 |
9:00 |
10:00 |
8:09 |
7:00 |
7:30 |
8:01 |
1.4.4 Analysis
Figure 18: Fishbone Diagram
The delays were observed carefully and after that it was found that shipments reached its destination after the due date. So we used six sigma tools the find out the root cause of these delays and we construct a fish bone diagram.
These are the causes which are mentioned in this fishbone diagram. It helps to reach the root of the problem and then eliminate one by one.
There is another important factor. That is the printed documents. Sometimes the documents are not printed very well. This also can increase the delay and misunderstanding of information. See the figures below.
We cannot read the numbers or given information clearly. Transporter can easily make a mistake. As a result, delay will occur or he will deliver the products to wrong customer or he will mix the items such as inter change.
In six sigma course, I have leant about how labors do mistake easily. There are several reasons some of them are, non -serious labors, untrained labors, driving in a manner that damage the products and so on.
To avoid such kinds of problems, Six Sigma plays very important role in it, such as, checking the correct paper work, because these can be human errors. If something goes wrong, then start the process from the beginning. Also keep the record of it so it helps next time to understand and also to correct any similar issue. Poka Yoka are the two words, which are used for this purpose, to reduce the human errors.
Also quality of packaging and reduce the unnecessary activities to complete the task and reduce the variation. Because if it increases then quality decreases.
Figure 19: Unclear Documents 1
Figure 20: Unclear Documents 2
1.4.5 Improve
· No pre-alert or notification for the coming truck to avoid the jam inside the base (DOSB) and to follow the exact process-map.
Figure 21: Reception Flow Process
Figure 22: The Jam Inside The Base (DOSB)
Suggestion :
As mentioned in the flow chart, the Aramex team should follow up with shipment and give notification to the reception team in the base for the coming truck (at least 24 hours before offloading)
· Most of the invoices or the documents are not clear (Low ink level).
Figure 23: Unclear Documents 3
Suggestion:
Aramex team should use a digital printer instead of scanning the documents to provide the service in a high quality and professional way.
· No double check for the AWB no. from Aramex guy before offloading which may lead to mess.
Suggestion:
Aramex guy should check the AWB no. before loading and double check before offloading the shipments to avoid the missing any box or mess situation.
· Some defective boxes and containers are delivered to the base without fixing.
Figure 24: Defective Boxes and Containers
Suggestion :
Schlumberger as major client of Aramex is expecting high quality service. So, Aramex should fix any defective box before delivering to the final destination, unless the damages were from the customs or the origin destination only in the tools inside the box. In this case they should inform the logistics team to solve this issue.
1.4.6 Control
If the order arrives late then, do a study about it, and check whether it is a supplier fault or not. If the supplier delivers the order late, then the company must penalized the supplier.
Also inform the company, when delivering the package. Sometimes the company is taking another order from another company, and both arrive at same time. One informs but other does not. In this case it will be a problem for a company to handle both at a time.
Company, should make it clear to Aramex that the package must be in good condition. If the packaging material is damaged and the boxes are squeezed from some sides, company must take some sudden action against it. If there is any broken box, it must be replaced, before it delivers.
Aramex Company must make some plane regarding bonus for the suppliers. Suppliers might drive a truck in bad manners or say fast. When they drive fast there is a high chance of damages to the items. Also they deliver the order after the time limit. If a company makes some policies that if a supplier always delivers the items on time and without any damage. At the end of the month he must be given some bonus as a reward. This will help others to do their job effectively.
1.5 Packaging Safety
Safety is one the important issue in all type of work environment. Safety can be about products, human and on many others things. There are certain rules for every work environment. Those rules must be followed. If any violation occurs, that company will be penalized. There are internal laws called OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). There are many rules and regulation for everything, labor’s rule, and packaging, safety equipment and for all industrial work.
Figure 25: Boxes With Poor Quality 1
In figure 25, we can see that the way they are handling the order is very poor. The materials inside could be damaged due to carelessness. If see the quality of boxes, it seems very poor. This is a violation of OSHA’s rules. Company will face a problem regarding cost. May be the company has to pay for this damage. It will affect their reputation badly. The boxes are squeezed and there conditions are bad. See the other figure for more clearance.
Figure 26: Boxes With Poor Quality 2
See the front face of the boxes in figure 26. By looking at this picture, it increases the chances for damage. And the person who orders this can complain about it to company. The quality of box does not seem to be a good.
Figure 27: Drilling & Measurement (D&M) Truck Check List
This is a good instruction by the company. It helps the new person or let’s say new employee. It will guide him which truck is suitable for a particular product. I a person or a supplier is not following these instructions, he will be reported to a manager or safety department. It shows which both ways, wrong and right. Wrong with red color and tight with green. If any employee sees that the truck is not chosen properly for that particular material, he can send the incident report (RIR) to the management.
WORK PROCESS IMPROVEMENT ON DOSB MAIN GATE
2.1 Introduction
This project provides an overall understanding of how to improve processes through simple yet important worked-out examples. What I specifically cover in this project is about coming up with an existing method and make measurable improvement on it. During the period of my COOP in SLB-DOSB, I noticed that some of the processes are done in an inefficient way. And as system engineering student at KFUPM, I have to come up with a proper solution. I’ve addressed in this report one important issue that employee at Schlumberger face every day when they are coming to the main gate during the rush hours, which is the waiting time to enter the base. I believe there is no better way to address a problem than to contribute to its solution, thus improving our daily lives.
2.2 Objective
Main objective of this project is to illustrate new yet simple ways to make the process work in a better and more efficient way than before, by reducing the waiting time for each entering car and minimize the number of security men at the gate which will also safe cost for the company.
2.3 Assumptions And Limitations
I’ve noticed that the traffic jam is in the rush hours which are in the morning (7 a.m-8 a.m.) & lunch break (12 p.m-1 p.m.). So, I took the data at the beginning and end of the rush hours instead of doing it at day-shift and night-shift.
In term of limitations, I can’t change the layout of the main gate and that won’t give us many choices for improvement.
2.4 Scope
I’ve focused on solving traffic jam problems by studying two different alternatives using one time measurements which is DTS (Direct Time Study).
Table 21: Solutions For DOSB Main Gate Delay Time
|
Number |
Alternative |
|
1 |
RFID (Radio-Frequency Identification) |
|
2 |
Barcodes |
2.5 Methodology
Direct time study (DTS) is the direct and continuous observation of a task using a stopwatch or other timekeeping device to record the time taken to accomplish the task. While observing and recording the time, the worker’s performance level is rated. These data are then used to compute a standard time for the task, by adding an allowance for personal time, fatigue, and delays.
2.6 Analysis
2.6.1 Current Situation
The current situation of checking cars entering the main gate is very old and need to be improved. At this point we will illustrate the steps of cars crossing the gate as we observed it.
The steps are as follow:
1- Car reaches the main gate.
2- Security checks the sticker.
a- If the sticker is valid, enter the Base.
b- Otherwise, return back to security building to get permission.
3-Security goes to room and press the button to open the gate.
4-Security closes the gate and returns to the original position.
Figure 28: Flow Chart for Current Situation
· Time of each steps are described in the tables below:
Table 22: Observations Time for Current Situation
|
Time of Different Observations (sec) |
||||||||||
|
steps |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
1 |
102.44 |
96.65 |
100.84 |
104.44 |
90.61 |
102.57 |
91.42 |
112.12 |
116.23 |
104.95 |
|
2 |
12.07 |
13.56 |
14.37 |
13.98 |
10.84 |
13.19 |
13.20 |
13.28 |
12.34 |
12.71 |
|
3 |
27.23 |
29.54 |
27.51 |
26.74 |
29.29 |
26.29 |
28.92 |
28.74 |
21.24 |
22.57 |
|
4 |
11.15 |
12.65 |
14.71 |
14.90 |
12.95 |
13.84 |
10.15 |
12.47 |
13.67 |
12.48 |
Table 23: Continue Observations Time for Current Situation
|
Time of Different Observations (sec) |
|||||||||||
|
steps |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
Avg. (min) |
|
1 |
117.72 |
103.29 |
114.26 |
92.30 |
113.58 |
107.86 |
102.77 |
93.44 |
109.46 |
107.96 |
1.74 |
|
2 |
13.44 |
13.12 |
14.76 |
12.74 |
14.53 |
14.46 |
13.33 |
11.54 |
12.97 |
14.78 |
0.22 |
|
3 |
22.88 |
26.05 |
20.97 |
21.06 |
26.89 |
28.86 |
28.98 |
29.64 |
28.76 |
20.28 |
0.44 |
|
4 |
13.45 |
10.16 |
12.51 |
10.30 |
10.33 |
13.08 |
14.96 |
13.68 |
10.33 |
13.86 |
0.21 |
|
Total avg. time (min) = 2.60 min |
After I took the observation, I illustrate the Pareto charts for analyze the major cause behind the current situation. Actually, I found the work element 1 (Car reaches the gate) is the highest frequency as shown in figure 29 because of the waiting time in the queue. However, after I analyzed the problem, we discovered that the major cause of delays is related to (security checking) as shown in figure 30.
Figure 29: Pareto Chart for Current Situation
Figure 30: Pareto Chart for Causes of Delays
Calculations:
I want to be 95% confident that the mean of the sample is within ± 10% of the true mean.
Element-2 = 2.35. Element-3 = 3.68. Element-4 = 3.84
So no need to add more observations
While observing and recording the data, I must simultaneously observe the performance of the worker and rate his performance relative to the definition of standard performance used by the organization. As I learned during ISE 323 class and lab, standard performance is given a rating of 100%. If PR>100, it means the worker rating is better than the standard (short observe time). Otherwise( PR<100), the worker rating is poorer than the standard (long observe time).So, I got 100%, 90%, 84%, and 78% as PRs for work elements 1, 2,3,and 4, respectively. The performance ratings of the security men in steps 2, 3, and 4 are ranked between fair and poor because of lack of experience, laziness or other factors that definitely affect the performance rating of the security men, while the performance rating of step 1 is ranked on average. All causes that may lead to the problems are shown in fishbone diagram, see figure 4. In addition, the normal time is:
= 1.74(1.00)+ 0.22(0.90)+ 0.44(0.84)+ 0.21(0.78)= 2.47 min.
However, we calculated the allowances for the security men based on" ILO PFD Allowance Table" are as follow:
For fatigue, personal time, and delays =Apfd = 9% as fixed allowances plus the variable allowances as follow: standing allowance 2%, inadequate light (well below) 2%, atmospheric conditions (heat and humidity) either Fine or exacting 2%, noise level (intermittent - loud) 2%, and tediousness 2% (Table 7). So, the total allowances are: Apfd = 19%.
Finally, we should calculate the standard time based on the normal time and the allowances that we got:
= 2.47*(1+ 0.19) = 2.94 min.
Figure 31: Fishbone Diagram for Security Weak Performance
2.6.2 After Implementation of RFID
We observed RFID’s applications in several locations, for instance at SDRC (Schlumberger Dhahran Research Center) replaced the old gate by RFID system so employee can simply pass the RFID’s reader and the gate will open automatically. So, I assumed that the steps are the same as SDRC for employee entering.
The steps are as follow:
1- Car reaches the main gate.
2- RFID checks the Tags.
a- If the Tag is valid, enter the university campus.
b- Otherwise, return back to security building to get permission.
3- Car enters the base.
Figure 32: Flow Chart for RFID
· Time of each steps are described in the tables below:
Table 24: Observations Time for RFID
|
Time of Different Observations (sec) |
||||||||||
|
steps |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
1 |
10.00 |
9.79 |
9.69 |
9.65 |
9.21 |
8.24 |
9.18 |
8.67 |
9.59 |
9.18 |
|
2 |
0.75 |
0.53 |
0.52 |
0.72 |
0.73 |
0.64 |
0.83 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.64 |
|
3 |
7.06 |
8.43 |
5.18 |
9.59 |
5.31 |
7.24 |
8.19 |
8.01 |
7.44 |
9.96 |
Table 25: Continue Observations Time for RFID
|
Time of Different Observations (sec) |
|||||||||||
|
steps |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
Avg (min) |
|
1 |
8.78 |
8.68 |
8.58 |
8.49 |
8.39 |
8.29 |
8.19 |
8.09 |
7.99 |
7.90 |
0.15 |
|
2 |
0.78 |
0.80 |
0.81 |
0.83 |
0.85 |
0.86 |
0.88 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
0.92 |
0.01 |
|
3 |
8.67 |
8.86 |
9.05 |
9.24 |
9.43 |
9.61 |
9.8 |
9.99 |
10.18 |
10.37 |
0.12 |
|
Total avg. time (min) = 0.27 |
Table 26: Time Saved Using RFID
|
DTS (Comparison) |
% Time Saved |
|
|
Normal way |
2.6 min |
% |
|
RFID |
0.27 min |
|
2.6.3 Barcodes
The third alternative is using barcodes. It used in many public places such as airports checkouts. Each driver has to place his own barcode-card to open the main gate. The steps are as follows:
1- Reach the main gate.
2- Place the barcode card into the reader.
a- The gate opens if the barcode is valid
b- Otherwise, return back to security building.
3- The car enters the base.
Figure 33: Flowchart for Barcode
· Time of each steps are described in the tables below.
Table 27: Observations Time for Barcode
|
Time of Different Observations (sec) |
||||||||||
|
steps |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
1 |
44.40 |
42.12 |
35.76 |
50.39 |
45.34 |
33.23 |
45.29 |
48.63 |
49.76 |
38.90 |
|
2 |
12.29 |
13.19 |
11.21 |
13.91 |
14.45 |
10.20 |
11.82 |
14.25 |
12.99 |
14.05 |
|
3 |
7.78 |
6.91 |
8.81 |
6.06 |
7.21 |
5.82 |
9.33 |
7.46 |
5.19 |
6.65 |
|
Time of Different Observations (sec) |
|||||||||||
|
Steps |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
Avg (min) |
|
1 |
58.09 |
34.13 |
46.73 |
38.63 |
53.46 |
52.02 |
52.18 |
59.66 |
30.64 |
44.99 |
0.75 |
|
2 |
13.11 |
14.32 |
10.20 |
14.32 |
14.37 |
10.68 |
11.54 |
12.69 |
14.77 |
13.48 |
0.21 |
|
3 |
6.25 |
8.97 |
5.44 |
5.42 |
8.30 |
6.85 |
6.91 |
7.32 |
6.54 |
8.64 |
0.12 |
|
Total avg. time (min) = 1.08 |
Table 28: Continue Observations Time for Barcode
Table 29: Time Saved Using Barcode
|
DTS (Comparison) |
% Time Saved |
|
|
Normal way |
2.60 min |
% |
|
Using Barcode |
1.08 min |
|
2.7 Comparison & Evaluation
Based on my study, RFID is more efficient than other alternatives because of its wireless capability. It has the advantage to scan items from distance unlike barcode which needs to scan items manually to store the information which reduces the time by 81.2%. RFID also can locate the item by sending a signal from the tags to the receiver. When it comes to cost all of them are cheap and can be implemented but RFID has more features than other alternatives.
Figure 34: Comparisons in Average Time Between the Current Situation and The Alternatives
2.8 Conclusion And Suggestions
I’m exposed to different daily interactions as human beings. Most of these interactions rely on the advanced technology. These interactions might be accompanied by some defects. The interactions can be described as processes. A good portion of our daily lives' processes are not being used efficiently. After discussing these different alternatives, the investigation shows that the best solution is using RFID chips based on the results I got. However, many improvements can be made in future researches by making some changes on the layout of the main gate.
Table 30: ILO PFD Allowance
|
A. |
Constant allowances: |
|
||
|
|
1 |
Personal allowance |
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
Basic fatigue allowance |
4 |
|
|
B. |
Variable allowances: |
|
||
|
|
1 |
Standing allowance |
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
Abnormal position allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Slightly awkward |
0 |
|
|
|
b. |
Awkward (bending) |
2 |
|
|
|
c. |
Very awkward (lying, stretching) |
7 |
|
|
3 |
Use of force, or muscular energy (lifting, pulling, or pushing): |
|
|
|
|
|
Weight lifted, pounds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
70 |
22 |
|
|
4 |
Inadequate light: |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Slightly below recommended |
0 |
|
|
|
b. |
Well below |
2 |
|
|
|
c. |
Quite inadequate |
5 |
|
|
5 |
Atmospheric conditions (heat and humidity) - variable |
0-100 |
|
|
|
6 |
Close attention: |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Fairly fine work |
0 |
|
|
|
b. |
Fine or exacting |
2 |
|
|
|
c. |
Very fine or very exacting |
5 |
|
|
7 |
Noise level: |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Continuous |
0 |
|
|
|
b. |
Intermittent - loud |
2 |
|
|
|
c. |
Intermittent - very loud |
5 |
|
|
|
d. |
High-pitched - loud |
5 |
|
|
8 |
Mental strain: |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Fairly complex process |
1 |
|
|
|
b. |
Complex or wide span of attention |
4 |
|
|
|
c. |
Very complex |
8 |
|
|
9 |
Monotony: |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Low |
0 |
|
|
|
b. |
Medium |
1 |
|
|
|
c. |
High |
4 |
|
|
10 |
Tediousness: |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Rather tedious |
0 |
|
|
|
b. |
Tedious |
2 |
|
|
|
c. |
Very tedious |
5 |
Table 31: Westinghouse System Skill Ratings
2.9 Site View
Figure 35: Site view of DOSB
This is a site view of the DOSB, where the most departments are located. If you see the blue line on the left; these are the workshops and offices of D&M (drilling and measurements) and wire line segments. See the black arrow.
The one on right is for testing and cool tubing segments and smith department. See the yellow arrow.
In the middle (white line), upstairs are the offices of supply chain and accounting and procurement. Down stairs are the materials and inventory departments. The dispatcher and logistics offices are in front of the main building, see the orang arrow.
The one on left front corner is the kitchen, mosque and cafeteria. Behind this there are two small areas for geo -service department. See the red arrow.
The front area which is in brown color is for car parking. See the purple arrow. The big pipes and forklift are stored outside this area, just next car parking. See the green arrow. Finally, the main gate of the DOSB is represented by the blue arrow.
3.1 Current Shelves
Figure 36: Current Shelves
Currently these shelves are used to store the files. If we see inside carefully, we can notice that there is a dust inside it. So suppose there 50 boxes, it will not be easier to clean them one by one. See figure above.
However this can be improved by suggesting some alternative designs, for example, electronic shelves where they can keep all the files on one place. It will save their time to search for a particular file.
Also, the way they are keeping the labels to distinguish the files from each other is very poor. There are many boxes, so if a person wants to take a particular file he will waste his time by searching that file.
In addition, the files are stored inside a box are not managed properly. It is on top of each other. If we want to take out the last file, before that we have to remove the upper files and keep them on safe side.
All these issues can be solved by improving the current design for shelves and replace them by electronic shelves.
Figure 37: The Way of Storing The Files
Figure 37 shows how the files are stored. If we start searching it will take a lot of time. Let’s modify these shelves and see how it will improve the process.
3.2 Design Objectives & Basic Measurements
Table 32: Design Objectives & Basic Measurements
|
Objectives |
Criteria |
|
Weight |
Better Quality |
|
Safety |
No important harm to other parts |
|
Durability |
Ease to use |
|
Amount of damage |
Shock absorber |
|
Dimensions |
Light weight |
3.3 Customer Requirements
Customer is looking for a fast machine, which can save their time. They can find their documents easily, also good way to handle the documents.
· Speed of work
· Controllable
· Pattern
· New form
· Code on files
3.4 House of Quality
Figure 38: House of Quality
3.5 Alternative Design for Shelves
Figure 39: Alternative Design for Shelves
This is an engineering design, where we design the alternatives. As you can see that we have an electronic machine. It works like this.
There is a button on the left, and on this button there are two arrows and one button is in the middle. The purpose of those two arrows is to scroll up and down and the middle button is to stop at desire stage.
If you see on the cubes, it is written that 1, 2, and 3 up to 7. Actually, these numbers are indicating the desired row, which will help the person to go to desired level and take out that particular file.
Under these numbers (1, 2, 3….7), there are alphabets with number like A1, up to A7 and same for others. This also distinguishes the location and the files, such as, if a person has some order related to machinery and some related to small machinery, he can notice that he has to go to row one and alphabet A1 for machinery and row 2 or same row but different alphabet like B1 or A2. See figure 39.
Figure 40: The Inside View of The Cube or Box
This picture is showing the inside view of the cube or box (figure 40). The files are stored in a pattern and there is some specific information about the files, where a person can distinguishes the specific file which he is looking for. This will help him to take the file in couple of seconds.
Figure 41: Information of The File Place
We cannot leave the form behind, because from the form person can check what the client or he wants actually. There is a small modification in the form. In normal situation, the company has its own form and on the form there are some information regarding contact, address and company name and so on. But in this alternative design, we add small portion in the form, which is at the bottom of the right side. This portion is will be used for the files. For example, row one and alphabet A1 and so on. This will help the logistic department to drag out file quickly
3.6 Alternative Concepts
Table 33: Alternative Concepts
|
|
|
Alternative Concepts |
||
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Sub Functions |
Automatic Control Button |
Metal |
Plastic |
Steel |
|
|
Boxes ( to store files) |
Plastic |
Steel |
|
|
|
Dimensions of Files |
Medium |
Normal |
|
|
|
Dimension (file cupboard) |
Rectangular |
Square |
|
|
|
Weight |
10kg |
15kg |
20kg |
|
Number of alternative designs concepts
3*2*2*2*3 = 72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative 1: metal - plastic - medium - rectangular - 10kg Alternative 2: plastic -steel - normal- square - 15kg Alternative 3: steel - plastic - medium – rectangular- 20kg Alternative 4: metal - steel – medium-rectangular - 15kg Alternative 5: steel - steel - normal - square - 10kg
|
3.7 Evaluation for Alternative Design
This evaluation will assist us in selecting the preferable design. We will assign some values for each design and then it will show us which one is better. Each statistic has its own importance and meaning to see the importance of between criteria and design. Table 34 is about criteria matrix and table 35 is about relative importance.
3.7.1 Criteria Matrix
Table 34: Criteria Matrix
|
|
Design 1 |
Design 2 |
Design 3 |
Design 4 |
Design 5 |
|
Weight |
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
|
Safety |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
Durability |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
Amount of damage |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
Dimensions |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3.7.2 Relative Importance
Table 35: Relative Importance
|
|
Weight |
Safety |
Amount of Damage |
Durability |
Dimensions |
Raw Total |
Normalize Weight |
|
Weight |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
0.4 |
|
Safety |
0 |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0.3 |
|
Durability |
0 |
0 |
- |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0.1 |
|
Amount of damage |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Dimensions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
- |
2 |
0.2 |
3.7.3 Selection for Preferable Design
Table 36: Selection of The Design
|
|
|
Design 1 |
|
Design 2 |
|
Design 3 |
|
Design 4 |
|
Design 5 |
|
|
Criteria |
N.W |
Rating |
WR |
Rating |
WR |
Rating |
WR |
Rating |
WR |
Rating |
WR |
|
Weight |
40% |
1 |
0.4 |
2 |
0.8 |
4 |
1.6 |
3 |
1.2 |
0 |
0 |
|
Safety |
30% |
4 |
1.2 |
4 |
1.2 |
2 |
0.6 |
2 |
0.6 |
3 |
0.9 |
|
Durability |
10% |
3 |
0.3 |
3 |
0.3 |
1 |
0.1 |
1 |
0.1 |
4 |
0.4 |
|
Amount of damage |
0% |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
Dimensions |
20% |
3 |
0.6 |
3 |
0.6 |
1 |
0.2 |
1 |
0.2 |
3 |
0.6 |
|
Total |
100% |
|
2.5 |
|
2.9 |
|
2.5 |
|
2.1 |
|
1.9 |
It is design 2, which is the preferable design. The design is selected based on the comparisons. After comparing all the design, the highest number was came in design so we selected this one. The number of weight ranking is 2.9 for design 2 and total number of weight is 100%.
It was a great experience to work in this company. I have leant many useful things, which will help me to build my career. I also applied some tools and applications which I have leant in my courses. After working for 6 months in this company, I am confident about my future plans. It opens my paths. Working in multinational company motivated me to work more effectively.
Company must take care of their orders and if something goes wrong, they must try to find the root cause of. Safety is always first, so company must follow the OSHA rules and regulation. It will save them from big problems and can save their money. Also always take some sudden actions if the boxes are damaged.
Aramex Company, should make some polices for the suppliers to motivate them. Give bonus to supplier who did his job efficiently.
· Take care of the items and follow the instructions. Also drive safely because driving badly can damage the products.
· Always follow the safety instructions. Safe is the best policy.
· Take care of printed documents. It could miss lead the supplier. Any un-cleared document can cause delay and can cost a lot.
· Whenever there is a problem always try to find a root cause. Fishbone diagram is one of the good approaches to find a solution for the problem.
· Sometimes employee must think of some alternatives of design and try to discuss with their seniors. It will make them more professional and will help to reach the high post in a company.
· Try to find the unnecessary steps or activities to make the process faster. And complete the task efficiently.
· They must not keep the big pipes and drilling machines in front of the car parking. It should be at the back or any other suitable place.
1) Shlumberger Website <http://www.slb.com/about/who/backgrounder.aspx>
2) http://index.about.com/index?gclid=CLjFidigyscCFYsEwwodzgcGqA&am=broad&q=osha+safety+manual+template&an=google_s&askid=b05e3ea8-0e0a-40b1-b315-90d6f9aac791-0-ab_gsb&dqi=&qsrc=999&ad=semD&o=4520&l=sem
3) https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/ADM_04-00-001.pdf
4) http://www.isixsigma.com/tools-templates/
5) https://www.moresteam.com/toolbox/
6) https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-23245-MS
7) http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/the-benefits-of-international-labour-standards/lang--en/index.htm
8) Tryling, D. P (2008). PRINTING BARCODES. Electrical Apparatus, 61(9), 27-28. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/200523282?accountid=27795
Total Freight Cost
Total Abdullah Fouad Aramex DHL-DGF Eram Expeditors Fedex Galaxy Panalpina Paragon DHL 38506.306666666671 3298448.6110644159 424087.32999999967 585808.1693333335 20291.228181818209 20903.4666 6666666 116019.73333333309 24927.333333333303 41953.029333333325 511171.01250000001Current siuation
Frequency car reach gate security checking open gate close gate 1.7400000000000002 0.22000000000000003 0.44000000000000006 0.21000000000000021 percentage car reach gate security checking open gate close gate 0.66666666666666674 0.75095785440613183 0.91954022988505746 1
Causes of delays
Frequency Delay from security checking Delay from opening the gate Delay from closing the gate Delay from the traffic sign 2.1 0.98 0.56000000000000005 0.34 percentage Delay from security checking Delay from opening the gate Delay from closing the gate Delay from the traffic sign 0.52763819095477393 0.77386934673366869 0.91457286432160756 1Differences in time current barcode RFID 2.6 1.08 0.27
Alternatives
Time avg(min)
Page 7
2
2
/
÷
ø
ö
ç
è
æ
x
k
s
t
a
=
÷
ø
ö
ç
è
æ
4
.
04
1
*
1
.
0
)
33
.
8
(
*
093
.
2