Ceteris - 618 M2
ctephenyt
psy_618_milestone_two_rubric_1.doc
PSY 618: Milestone Two Rubric
Prompt : Provide an analysis of the final project case study organization based on the company’s best practices, ethical implications, diversity, and collaboration. Address the following questions:
· Which motivational theories can be used to help explain the issues surrounding low productivity within this company?
· What type of leadership style is prominent at the company?
· How does management style affect employee morale?
· Is there a need for collaboration between the company’s leadership and the consultant?
· What is the role of the consultant when proposing changes?
· Is productivity affected by industry-specific ethical standards?
· What ethical responsibility does the consultant have in the relationship with the client company?
· What is the relationship between diversity and productivity in the organization?
· What have been the effects of employee participation in working teams?
Format: The analysis should follow these formatting guidelines: 10–12 pages in length, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and citations in APA format.
|
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
|
Motivational Theories |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and supports identification of theories with evidence from scholarly research (9-10) |
Identifies relevant motivational theories that explain issues surrounding low productivity in the company (8) |
Identification of motivational theories is not comprehensive (7) |
Does not identify relevant motivational theories that explain issues surrounding low productivity in the company (0-6) |
10 |
|
Leadership Style |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses scholarly research to support identification (9-10) |
Identifies the leadership style prominent at the company (8) |
Identification of leadership style is lacking in detail (7) |
Does not identify the leadership style prominent at the company (0-6) |
10 |
|
Employee Morale |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the description is supported using specific examples (9-10) |
Describes the impact of the leadership style on employee morale (8) |
Description of the impact of leadership style on employee morale is not comprehensive (7) |
Does not describe the impact of the leadership style on employee morale (0-6) |
10 |
|
Collaboration |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes supportive scholarly research (9-10) |
Discusses the need for collaboration between leadership and consultant (8) |
Discussion of the need for collaboration lacks supporting detail (7) |
Does not discuss the need for collaboration between leadership and consultant (0-6) |
10 |
|
Consultant’s Role |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides appropriate examples (9-10) |
Describes the consultant’s role in proposing changes (8) |
Description of the consultant’s role in proposing changes is lacking in detail and support (7) |
Does not describe the consultant’s role in proposing changes (0-6) |
10 |
|
Ethical Standards |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and elaborates with supporting details based on research (9-10) |
Explains the impact of ethical standards on productivity (8) |
Explanation of the impact of ethical standards on productivity is not comprehensive (7) |
Does not explain the impact of ethical standards on productivity (0-6) |
10 |
|
Ethical Responsibility |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and is supported with evidence from scholarly research (9-10) |
Describes the ethical responsibility of a consultant to the client company (8) |
Description of the ethical responsibility of a consultant is lacking in depth and detail (7) |
Does not describe the ethical responsibility of a consultant to the client company (0-6) |
10 |
|
Diversity |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and is supported with evidence from scholarly research (9-10) |
Describes the relationship between diversity and productivity in the organization (8) |
Description does not comprehensively relate diversity to productivity in the organization (7) |
Does not describe the relationship between diversity and productivity in the organization (0-6) |
10 |
|
Working Teams |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates identification with scholarly research (9-10) |
Identifies the effects of employee participation in working teams (8) |
The effects of employee participation in working teams are lacking in detail (7) |
Does not identify the effects of employee participation in working teams (0-6) |
10 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (9-10) |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (8) |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (7) |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-6) |
10 |
|
Earned Total Comments: |
100% |
