Annotated Bibliography. 4 pages
abhay15
rubric_and_comments.xlsxAnnotated Bibliography
| Student Name | Total Points Possible | Total Points Received | Late Work Percentage (select from drop down menu) | Late Work Deduction | Final Points Received | ||||||
| 150 | 27.00 | 0% Windows User: Windows User: Select dropdown menu for percentage deducted for late work. | 0.00 | 27.00 | |||||||
| Criterion | Superior Criteria (100%) | Excellent Criteria (95%) | Satisfactory Criteria (85%) | Marginal Criteria (75%) | Unsatisfactory Criteria (0%) | Points Possible | Evaluation (select from drop down menu) | Points Received | Faculty Feedback | ||
| Element 1: Annotated Bibliography | Student submits thorough and detailed work as demonstrated by the originality, depth of analysis, and/or creativity when describing the essence of each entry and pertinent details about its content for his/her annotated bibliography. There are no errors in the content. Detailed content is evident in the assignment with several connections to the topic. | Student submits detailed quality work as demonstrated by the depth of details evident in the entries and about its content for his/her annotated bibliography. There are one or two minor errors in the content. The assignment makes several connections to the topic. | Student submits an annotated bibliography but it lacks some details. There are some errors in the content and/or the entries lack connections to the topic. The assignment directions are met; however, the assignment lacks in depth of content. | Student submits a cursory annotated bibliography that does not fully address the directions and is missing a lot of pertinent content. There are many errors and the content lacks clarity and depth. | Does not meet minimal standards. | 70 | 0% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion. | 0 | The summaries of the articles explain the main points. Some of the key aspects stated in the instructions were missing (such as a description of the assumptions and research methods). Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion. |
||
| Element 2: Critical Thinking | Student's annotated bibliography critically analyzes the content for strengths and weaknesses as related to the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry. | Student's annotated bibliography critically analyzes most of the content for strengths and weaknesses as related to the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry. There are one or two minor errors in the logic and/or critical thinking applied to the assignment. | Student's annotated bibliography analyzes most of the content for strengths and weaknesses as related to most of the following: the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and/or any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry. | Student's annotated bibliography demonstrates a weak analysis of the content and loosely addresses some of the following: the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry. | Does not meet minimal standards. | 50 | 0% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion. |
Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion. | 0 | The paper mostly summarized the articles. Critical thinking was not shown as there was not an analysis or critique. Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion. |
|
| Element 3: Written Delivery Style & Grammar | Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors. | Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar. | Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar. | Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style. | Does not meet minimal standards. | 15 | 85% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion. |
Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion. | 12.75 | Grammatical and spelling errors are in the paper. Before submitting, do a Grammar and spell check. In some cases, words were used that did not seem to make sense. Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion. |
|
| Element 4: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations) | Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors. | Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format. | Student mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident. | Student demonstrates weak and/or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident. | Does not meet minimal standards. | 15 | 95% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion. |
Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion. | 14.25 | The citations are mostly in APA format. Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion. |
|
|
Windows User: Windows User: Enter student name. |
Windows User: Windows User: Select dropdown menu for percentage deducted for late work. |
DIRECTIONS FOR STUDENT: As part of your Doctoral Seminar for this set of weeks, you are participating in a seminar-style discussion about the weekly topics. You will be asked to address five of the required resources and at least five additional resources from the Walden Library and to incorporate them into your posting. As a related exercise, submit an annotated bibliography of the 10 resources you will refer to this week. For each entry, be sure to address the following as a minimum: A) Include the full APA citation. B) Discuss the scope of the resource. C) Discuss the purpose and philosophical approach. D) Discuss the underlying assumptions. E) If referring to a research reporting article, present the methodology. F) Relate the resource to the body of resources you have consulted in this course. G) Discuss any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry. DIRECTIONS FOR FACULTY: 1) Enter student name. 2) When appropriate, select Late Work Percentage and enter percent using drop down menu. 3) Use the drop down menu for each criterion in the Evaluation box to grade assignment. 4) Enter student feedback in the Faculty Feedback box as needed.
APA Manual (6th edition): Chapter 3 - Writing Clearly and Concisely; Chapter 4 - The Mechanics of Style; Chapter 5 - Displaying Results; Chapter 6 - Crediting Sources; Chapter 7 - Reference Examples © 2016 Laureate Education, Inc.
