Make changes to powerpoint

profileceey09
freescale_semiconductors_r.pptx

Freescale Semiconductors, Inc.

Student name

Course

Date

Additional laws and harsher penalties

harsher penalties acts as a deterrent to crime

Additional laws to cover the loophole used to fraud

Hefty fines prohibits engagement in crime

Increases compliance with the laws

Human beings who have a tendency to break laws run Corporates. However having harsher penalties acts as a deterrent to committing a crime since they are afraid of penalties and severe fines to be paid. Having additional laws to cover the loophole used by the executives to commit unethical or fraudulent acts. Also having Hefty fines and increases, supervision prohibits engagement in crime as well as increases compliance with the laws

2

1. strategies to eliminate or mitigate insider trading

Preventing information that is non public from circulating

Such information denies perfect knowledge to investors

Increases the cost of stock through hoarding information

Only fully disclosed information should circulate

Insider trading happens when a few people, usually the executives, hold confidential information about the trading activities of the firm. One of the ways of preventing insider trading is by preventing information that is nonpublic from circulating within the market. This requires a full disclosure by the firms concerning the intended trading activities of the company. Having nonpublic information in circulation denies perfect knowledge to investors as well as increases the cost of stock through hoarding information for personal gains. However, when the information is public, the price will remain low and eliminate the privilege of knowing first (Legal Information Institute, 2013).

3

2. strategies to eliminate or mitigate insider trading

Restricting the time where the top executives of a firm can sell the shares awarded to them to an automatic pre arranged plan

The stock option awarded to top executives be sold at pre agreed time

Automatic time of selling stock eliminates making deals with investors

Makes the information publicly available

Most corporates reduce the cost of holding top-level executive through stock options. However to deter insider trading, restricting the time where the top executives of a firm can sell the shares awarded to them to an automatic pre-arranged plan should be followed. This restriction removes the hoarding of the investment information by the executives. There should be a clearly defined timeline when the executives sell their stock option, only after they have received their compensation and not before being compensated (Gandel, 2012).

4

3. strategies to eliminate or mitigate insider trading

Ban the payment of the executives using the stock options

Eliminates the unfair investment information holding by executives

Firms to seek other alternatives of paying executives

Continued of stock options makes executives hold information others don’t have

The most useful tool would be a total ban the payment of the executives using the stock options since this option makes the executives have the privilege of always having some unfair information and power to decide who buys the stock and at what amount. The elimination removes the wrong investment information holding by executives (Securities and Exchange Commision, 2013). This call for the firms to seek other alternatives to compensate their executives.

5

key internal controls needed over the communication

Development of an insider trading policy that:

Defines clearly what is insider trading

The trading times for executives

Actions to be taken against insider traders

Communication with external stakeholders will start with the development of an insider trading policy that defines clearly, what insider is trading, the trading times for executives as well as the actions to be taken against insider traders. This policy will clarify how the firm will be sharing the information about the expected activities to be happening in the company. The policy, having defined what is considered as insider trading as well as to what extent the executives of the firm can interact with external stakeholders and what they would offer as information concerning the activities of the enterprise (Louwers, Ramsay', Sinason, Strawser, & Thibodeau, 2015).

6

key internal controls needed over the communication

Inclusion of third parties and watch dogs in reviewing the reports and communication of the firm

Allows transparency, visible and clear communication

confidentiality to the firm’s information

Having a clear line of communication lines where external parties can offer their ideas, critique and queries

The inclusion of third parties and watchdogs in reviewing the reports and communication of the firm allows transparency, visible and transparent communication to exist in the company. The watchdogs will be crucial in ensuring that relevant information is shared with external stakeholders. However, confidentiality to the company’s information has to be maintained to ensure that all information is not carelessly spread to the wrong person. It is achieved by having a clear line of communication where external parties can offer their ideas, critique, and queries (Louwers, Ramsay', Sinason, Strawser, & Thibodeau, 2015).

 

7

Alternative plan to act on the leaked information

SEC would not act on the impartial and lack of evidence leaks

I would make it easier for SEC to act on the information by:

Report to the SEC in a detailed manner that is well thought out

Include most documentations to corroborate the evidences I refer to

I will also attach a list of witnesses who can be contacted for confirmation

SEC would not act on the unbiased information that lacks evidence to support the claims raised in the information. To ensure that the leak gets acted upon, I would make it easier for SEC to act on the information by reporting to the SEC in a detailed manner that is well thought out. This will be held possible by including most documentations to corroborate the evidence I refer to in the communication as well as attaching a list of witnesses who can be contacted for confirmation.

8

strategy to communicate the alternative plan

Will report the case under anonymity calls to protect the identity

Will seek the services of an attorney to advice on the way forward

Would communicate to those in position to take action on the information

Avoid direct communication with the media

Communicating the alternative plan is very crucial. To ensure the confidentiality and safety, I will report the case under anonymity calls to protect the identity of the whistleblower. Before availing the information as well as during the confirmation process, I will seek the services of an attorney to advise on the way forward concerning the legal status of the issues I have raised.

However, I will avoid any confrontation with the media but would communicate to those in a position to take action on the information. Which is a requirement under the whistleblowing requirements

9

auditor’s responsibilities between consulting and audit engagements: similarities

Has to abide by ethical standards

Professionalism and confidentiality

Has to uphold their independence and give fair information

Are required to have professional competence in the assignment they undertake

Highest level of integrity is required in both cases

For an auditor, there are similarities between the responsibilities when conducting audit work or when consulting for a client. The auditor has to abide by the professional ethical requirements such as honesty, integrity, and confidentiality. The auditor has to use their independence when offering their opinions in audit work or offering alternatives during consultancy. In both cases, an auditor is required to provide fair information as well as have the professional competences required by the AICPA registration. Such include the right educational levels, experience, and professional membership requirement (Louwers, Ramsay', Sinason, Strawser, & Thibodeau, 2015).

10

When auditing

Appointed by the board

Has to abide by PCAOB, AICPA and GAAPS

The jobs have to meet the legal requirements

Have rules, regulations and standards to meet

Gives and independent opinion on fairness and accuracy of financial statements to shareholders

The auditor identifies fraudulent activities to board and to SEC

When conducting auditing services, an auditor has to maintain communication with the firm’s board, which is responsible for the appointment of the auditor. The auditor has to abide the by rules and regulation governing the audit work as provided by the PCAOB, AICPA, and GAAPS. The auditor’s work is ruled by the legal requirements in both appointments, reporting, and nature of work to undertake. An auditor is responsible for giving an independent opinion on fairness and accuracy of financial statements to shareholders as well as assure them that the statements are free from any material misstatement. The auditor is also required to identify fraudulent activities to board and to SEC (Louwers, Ramsay', Sinason, Strawser, & Thibodeau, 2015).

11

When consulting engagements

Is appointed by the firm’s management

Are responsible and reports to the managers

They do not have a legal backing in how they conduct

They offer viability reports

Can offer alternatives

However, when on a consulting job, an auditor is appointed by the firm’s management, for whom the auditor is responsible. The consultancy assignments are not a legal requirement, but the terms and condition of the engagement are determined by an agreement between the management and the consulting auditor. The consultant offers a viability report to the management concerning the project and can provide alternatives that the management can use to achieve maximum returns (Louwers, Ramsay', Sinason, Strawser, & Thibodeau, 2015).

12

a position on whether more legislative and/or regulatory agency oversight will increase or decrease corporate fraud

Increased oversight decrease corporate fraud

It makes the corporates comply with regulations

Will help identify fraud easily

Legislative oversight will seal the weakness taken advantage of by corporate to commit fraud

I am of the opinion that increased oversight decrease corporate fraud since it makes the corporates comply with regulations as well as will help identify fraud easily. On the other hand, Legislative oversight will seal the weakness taken advantage of by corporate to commit fraud.

13

references

 Gandel, S. (2012, November 29). How to really stop (some) insider trading. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2012/11/29/how-to-really-stop-some-insider-trading/

Legal Information Insitutute. (2013). 17 CFR 240.10b5-1 - Trading “on the basis of” material nonpublic information in insider trading cases. Retrieved from cornell university Law School: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/240.10b5-1

Louwers, T. J., Ramsay', R. J., Sinason, D. H., Strawser, J. R., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2015). Auditing & Assurance Services (6 ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill Education,.

Securities and Exchange Commision . (2013, 01 15). Insider Trading. Retrieved from http://www.sec.gov/answers/insider.htm

14