Home work
*
Chapter 10
Mental Health Services
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
- Gain knowledge about the origins, basic components and organization of the U.S. mental health services industry and its financing
- Understand the nature of mental illness, its prevalence and evolution of treatment modalities
- Gain appreciation for barriers to mental illness care
- Review effects of the ACA on mental health services access and reimbursement
*
Current Background
- Mental health terminology changes:
- “Mental health care” now often “behavioral health care” with psychiatric care, a medical subspecialty, one aspect of integrated services
- “Patient” replaced by “consumer” or “person/people” with a psychiatric or substance abuse disorder or “mental health issue”
- “Problem-based” diagnosis model replaced with “strength-based” model in “Recovery Movement”
*
Historical Overview (1)
- Colonial era to 1800s: mentally ill confined to almshouses, jails, hospitals with no treatment, decrepit conditions
- 1800s: Quakers advocated “moral treatment,” est. 1814 Philadelphia “asylum.”
- WWI: “shell shock” in returning military focused new attention on mental illness
*
Historical Overview (2)
- 1930s: First effective biological treatments: insulin coma, drug-induced convulsions, electroconvulsive therapy
- Post WWII, National Mental Health Act of 1946:
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Dept. of Veterans’ Affairs psychiatric hospitals and clinics
*
Historical Overview (3)
- By 1950, still primarily inpatient-1/2 M+ in state, county mental hospitals
- New drugs for schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders allowed ambulatory treatment
- Partial hospitalization
- After-care programs
- Transitional residences
*
Historical Overview (4)
- 1955: Joint Commission on Mental Illness & Health est. by Congress, the first time a federal body considered resources for the mentally ill
- Attacked poor quality in county & state psychiatric hospitals
*
Historical Overview (5)
1960s
- Mental health care reforms supported by President Kennedy
- Additional, new pharmaceutical treatments
- Federal Mental Retardation Facilities, Community Mental Health Centers Construction Acts
- Medicare, Medicaid, SSI, Social Security Disability & housing subsidies accessible for mentally ill
*
Historical Overview (6)
1960s-1970s-Unproven assumptions guided care
- Beliefs that 1) psychiatric disorders lie on a quantitative continuum with severe mental illness not qualitatively different from lesser severe mental distress, 2) early intervention could prevent development of severe illness; both beliefs later proven invalid
- Federal financial investments in community-based services hoping to prevent severe mental illness through primary prevention
*
Historical Overview (7)
- Until 1980s, payments on basis of units of service; no incentives for limiting treatments that went on for years; 1955-1980: treatment episodes quadrupled.
- Insurers balked with payment limits, discounted fee-for-service payments different from other medical care, “carve-outs” outsourcing coverage to specialty managers, and capitation; “non-parity” for mental health services was established to plague the mental health industry for decades.
*
Historical Overview (8)
- Deinstitutionalization (1970s-1980s)
- Medicaid incentives to move patients from psychiatric hospitals to community boarding and nursing homes; community mental health centers inadequately staffed for severely mentally ill
- Large numbers incarcerated, homeless
- 1950: 77 % inpatient, 23% outpatient; 1990: 21% inpatient, 7 % partial hospitalization, 67% outpatient
*
Historical Overview (9)
- Breakthrough developments- 1980s
- NAMI, NIMH, clinical researchers’ advocacy re-defined mental illness from quantitative continuum to discontinuous in development; mental illness as biologically based, disorders more clearly defined requiring targeted treatments, not unfocused “talk therapies.”
*
Historical Overview (10)
- Carter’s Presidential Commission on Mental Health sought applications of new research findings to benefit patients and reduce costs
- Recommendations taken by Health & Human Services to expand psychosocial rehabilitation programs under Medicaid; Medicaid payment for outpatient services expanded; severely ill eligible for SSI
- Expanded services severely curtailed in 1980s under Ronald Reagan
*
Historical Overview (11)
- 1990-Present
- Focus on severe mental illness with block grants, federal support for research, training, treatment, not erroneous prevention strategies
- Medicare Act of 2003 expanded drug coverage; CHIP increased coverage for low-income children; Wellstone-Domenici Parity Act of 2008 advanced equitable coverage for mentally ill
- ACA of 2010 reinforced insurance parity.
*
Recipients of Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (1)
- Epidemiological Catchment Area & Co-morbidity Studies report:
- 26.2% of Americans will have a mental disorder during any one year period, 57.7 M people
- 6%, subgroup classified as having “serious mental illness” with symptoms (excluding substance abuse) for at least 12 months.
*
Recipients of Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (2)
- Neuropsychiatric disorders: the leading cause of disability in the U.S. and Canada measured in units encompassing the total burden of disease, defined as “Disability-adjusted life years” (DALYs); contribute 2x DALYS of cardiovascular disease & cancers.
- DALYS = total number of years lost to illness, disability, or premature death in a given population (Fig. 10-1)
*
Recipients of Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (3)
- Diagnosis and Treatments
- As effective as physical health treatments; criteria provide predictability of natural history of illness and treatment
- Classified in 17 categories; diagnostic criteria for over 450 conditions
- Co-morbidity: the co-existence of two diagnoses; ~1/2 of mentally ill have an additional disorder; e.g. substance abuse of 23-80% with other disorders
*
Recipients of Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (4)
- Mental illness costs
- In addition to unquantifiable personal and family suffering, $ 300 B annually for disability payments, health care expenditures and lost earnings.
*
Treatment Services
- Who does and does not get treatment?
- 45.6 M people over 18 years met criteria for one psychiatric disorder in the past 12 months…19.6% of adult population; only 38.2% able to access treatment.
- Access to treatment worst among underserved groups: minorities, low income, uninsured, rural
*
Barriers to Care (1)
- Barriers: provider availability; financial, lack of health insurance; stigma; misunderstandings about treatability; personal & provider attitudes; cultural issues; poorly organized systems of care
- Substance abuse and addictions: providers view as “moral,” not chronic disease issues; removal from treatment often follows relapse
*
Barriers to Care (2)
Children and Adolescents
- Service use data available first in 1999 from NIMH survey: only 9% able to access some services: half of those with diagnosed mental illness; school system is largest provider
- 2009 study: prevalence in 4-17 year olds increased 40% through diagnosis by primary doctors
- Clinical research for children & adolescents lags far behind adults; inadequate numbers of trained professionals for size of population at risk
*
Barriers to Care (3)
- Older Adults- 25% with significant psychiatric disorders
- Diagnosis & treatment difficult due to other conditions
- Complications from drugs to treat medical conditions
- Fear of stigma
- Stereotypes about aging
*
The Organization of Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services
Four major delivery system Sectors:
Psychiatric and behavioral health
Primary care
Human services
Voluntary support network
*
Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Sector (1)
- Behavioral health professionals, e.g. psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurses, psychiatric social workers, behavioral health clinicians; also “peer specialists”
- Provide majority of outpatient care in private or public clinics; acute care in designated in-patient hospital beds in community and public hospitals; residential treatment centers for children and adolescents
*
Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Sector (2)
- Multi-service facilities provide or coordinate a range of outpatient, intensive case management , partial hospitalization, or inpatient services.
- Increased focus on independent living accommodations in apartments with case managers to assist with daily living skills
*
Primary Care Sector
- Health care professionals, e.g. private practice internal medicine, family practice doctors, nurse practitioners, pediatricians, clinics, hospitals, nursing homes
- Often the initial and only point of contact for mental health services
- Rates of mental illness diagnosis in primary care in past decade: doubled for children and increased almost 30% for adults
*
Human Services Sector (1)
- Staff of social services agencies, school-based counseling services, residential rehab services, vocational rehab services, criminal justice/prison-based services, religious professional counselors
- 2008 recession reduced state funding & increased barriers to care from this sector with loss of support for housing, medical care and medications
*
Human Services Sector (2)
- Increased homelessness; lost medication support led to recurrence of symptoms among those previously stable
- Increased petty crimes and incarcerations in prison system ill-equipped for treatment, with very high costs
*
Volunteer Support Network Sector
- Self-help groups, family advocacy groups
- Powerful in shifting public attention to people with persistent and severe mental illness
- Major impacts on Congress and funding appropriations for research on mental illness and substance abuse through the NIMH
- State legislature lobbying against cuts in service programs and general assistance for mentally ill
*
Paradigm Shifts (1)
- Since 2008, shifts toward turning the mental health system into a more integrated, effective care system
- Recovery Oriented Systems of Care (ROSC)
- Initiated by Bush’s “Freedom Commission on Mental Health.” 2004 National Consensus Conference cited “recovery” as most important goal for transforming mental illness care in America.
*
Paradigm Shifts (2)
- Recovery Oriented Systems of Care, cont’d
- Focus on choice, consumer strength-based empowerment, establishing hope for a better life to guide treatment planning; goal to empower with choices and vision for hopeful future; link consumers’ strengths with family, community resources.
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)
- Provides psychiatric benefits with parity
*
Paradigm Shifts (3)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, cont’d
- ACOs’ care continuum will benefit mental health service recipients with coordination of services through primary care and with multiple providers
- Integration of Primary Care and Behavioral Health Services
- ACA provisions on parity support service integration;
*
Paradigm Shifts (4)
- Integration of Primary Care and Behavioral Health Services
- ACA provisions on parity support service integration, diffusing prior issues with behavioral health professional reimbursement for primary care services
- PCMH puts behavioral health practitioners on the “team” of providers eligible for reimbursement
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (1)
- Funding sources: private health insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, state and county funding, contracts and grants
- “Non-parity” existed for many years, denying the chronic nature of mental illness compared with medical conditions; dates to 1950s
- Parity: requirements that insurers cover mental health at the same levels as general medical care
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (2)
- Mental Health Parity Act, 1996:
- Equated aggregate lifetime limits, annual limits with general medical care
- Allowed cost-shifting loopholes: e.g., limits on psychiatric inpatient days, prescription drugs, raising co-insurance & deductibles; did not require employers to offer mental health coverage or coverage for substance abuse disorders
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (3)
- Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, 2008 (built upon 1996 Act)
- End health insurance benefit inequity between mental health/substance abuse plans and medical/surgical plans
- Equal coverage applicable to all deductibles, copayments, coinsurance and out-of-pocket expenses and all treatment limitations
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (4)
- Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, 2008 (built upon 1996 Act), cont’d
- Parity for annual & lifetime dollar limits
- Broad definition of mental health & substance abuse benefits
- MH coverage not mandated, but if offered must be equal with medical coverage
- Out-of-network coverage must be equal
- Preserves existing state parity laws
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (5)
Public Funding of Mental Health Care
- Recession effects on State budgets: unemployment, financial markets impact
- Kaiser 50-state study:
- Sharp Medicaid outlay increases due to recession, declines in employment
- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act assistance insufficient to stem state crises
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (6)
Public Funding of Mental Health Care, cont’d
- Rockefeller Institute Study of Gap scenarios after federal stimulus:
- “Low gap”: $ 70 B shortfall: 4% of expenses
- “High gap”: $ 100 B shortfall: 7% of expenses
- States are reducing psychiatric hospital & behavioral health services funding in response to budget shortfalls
- Negative effects likely for 2-4 years post-recession
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (7)
- The ACA is a “game-changer”
- $100 B appropriation over 10 years & $100 B discretionary funds will extend insured health services to millions of mentally ill persons
- ACA health insurance exchanges and Medicaid expansion will open care access to many mentally ill adult, child and adolescent persons
- Use of “non-quantitative treatment limitations” by insurers to curtail benefits must be monitored and addressed
*
Financing Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services (8)
- Cost Containment Mechanisms
- Managed care systems (public and private) tightly control & monitor services for mentally ill; use subcontractors, “Managed Behavioral Healthcare Organizations” (MBHOs) to manage behavioral health patients through “carve-outs;” research indicates that MBHOs successfully facilitate service access and coordinate care for patients in need.
*
The Future of Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Services
- Shift to a “Recovery Model” provides for a strength-based system with client-directed goals paramount
- Move toward psychiatric care more integrated with primary care
- ACA will assure Americans of access to services and bring disenfranchised mentally ill persons into the “system.”
*