Audience:
1. Are there words and/or sentences that do not read clearly to you? Any feel like they do not “fit”with the rest of the piece?
The intro part talks about “how”to shift the narrow focus, but the body paragraphs talk more about why and when it comes from which makes the paper somehow inconsistent.
Format/Mechanics:
1. Does the format fit the genre pf an op-ed? Are the sentences and ideas digestible for a public reader?
Yes, but somehow the paper did not explain the author’s opinion very clearly.
2. Has the work been thoroughly proofread? Even if it has, are there suggestions you could make for the paper’s readability?
The paper asks more questions than explaining them.
Purpose:
1. Do you feel convinced by the writer? Why/Why not?
The paper could be more convincing. The paper explained how “selfish and unreasonable” corporate management is if it only cared about shareholder’s interest. Maybe also discuss the consequences and negative effects this would have on our society.
ldsfy321
review_checklist.docx
0
