Interahip theory paper

Does Not Meet Requirements

(0-1 pts)

Meets Minimum Requirements, but Needs Improvement

(2 pts)

Meets All Requirements

(3 pts)

Exceeds Requirements

(4 pts)

Points

28 points possible (80% of grade)

1)Binder Presentation 10 %

Binder is missing more than one of the requirements

Binder is missing one of the requirements.

Binder has professional appearance and includes each of the required elements (cover page, table of contents, dividers, work cited—if needed, APA format)

Professional appearance of binder exceeds requirements and includes creative graphic components.

2) Supporting Documents

5 %

Supporting documents are missing or lack effort

Minimum requirements met, but not presented professionally (Examples: Dirty or wrinkled menus, kitchen diagram sloppy, not labeled).

Labeled color photos / illustrations of dishes, A Menu included, Clean straight lines, and clear lettering for kitchen diagram, Minimum of 10 (3 month) or 20 (6 month) recipes from site, Kendall vs. Real World: clearly written comparisons, good insight

Supporting documents exceed requirements and are linked to other sections of the portfolio (journal / business analysis paper).

3) Journal

25 %

Entries are either nonexistent, lack effort, or inconsistent.

Required minimum number of entries are provided, but lack detail.

Appropriate number of entries completed (10 for 3 month and 20 for 6 month).

Detailed observations of business levels, kitchen atmosphere, prep work, self assessment of performance are included.

Appropriate number of entries completed. Work assignments are discussed in detail and student reflects on professional growth. Journal entries are linked to supporting documents.

4) Business Analysis Paper

4a) Company Profile

5 %

Profile lacks adequate information

Required information provided but lacks detail to sufficiently describe the company.

Profile includes all required elements (name, location, type of cuisine, avg. number of covers, check avg., and target market). The company is described in detail.

Profile thoroughly describes the company and provides additional information such as marketing collateral, promotional events, menu changes, etc.)

4b) Operations Analysis

15 %

Inadequate analysis of

operations.

Minimal analysis of

operations.

Thorough analysis of operations covering management style, training, sanitation standards, ordering and receiving procedures, par levels, consistency of the final product, how the kitchen layout affects production, and how all of the above affects customer experience

Student makes insightful observations and thorough analysis of operations.

4c) Critical Review

15 %

Insufficient reflection.

Reflection is present, but lacks depth.

Student reflects thouroughly on self evaluation and response to supervisor feedback, Kendall preparation, and identifies how internship has affected career goals.

Unique and insightful reflection.

Does Not Meet Requirements

(0-1 pts)

Meets Minimum Requirements, but Needs Improvement

(2 pts)

Meets All Requirements

(3 pts)

Exceeds Requirements

(4 pts)

Points

28 points possible (80% of grade)

4d) Writing

5 %

Writing is not college-level. Many grammatical and mechanical errors. If paraphrased and quoted material is used the accompanying reference list is missing.

Writing is competent,

but not always clear.

Some grammatical and/or mechanical errors interfere with reading.

Citations, if needed, have errors.

Writing is clear; language and sentence-construction reflect the work of a college-level writer. Slight grammatical or mechanical errors. APA guidelines are followed.

Writing flows, with effective word choice and sentence construction. No grammatical or mechanical errors are evident. APA guidelines are followed.

TOTAL POINTS

(Page 1 + Page 2)

Total: