need help for english essay

Surname 6

Student’s Name

Instructor’s Name

Course Title

Date Submitted

Government regulations do not guarantee our safety; we are responsible for our own safety

Many people believe that the government regulations are important in safeguarding individuals against dangerous substances or situations. Amazingly, people see government as a trusted entity that gives people’s interest a priority. In fact, when individuals see government regulating and licensing restaurants, banks, restaurants, medical doctors, daycares, physicians and other businesses, they contend that government is striving to ensure that their products and operations are safe and there is no risk or harm will emanate from them. Indeed, I have heard occasionally individuals arguing that he/she would not use a cab without government inspection certification. On the other hand, individuals normally are regarded as being incapable or compromise on their health and safety just to achieve what they want in the sense that they can consume anything or resort to the use of any services or products like drinks with sugars larger than 16 ounces, without serious considerations of their health and safety. Therefore, people should be dictated on what they do or what not to do to guarantee them their safety. However, in my view, government regulations do not guarantee our safety; we are responsible for our own safety.

Venter implies that you need government regulations to be safe and that you cannot take care of your safety or even determine what is best for your health and safety. Venter asserts in the article that people who disobeys and do not abide by government directives to be immunized contribute to the emergence of worst cases of infectious diseases that their impact is so detrimental and far reaching that the purported link between immunization and autism. In the article, Venter affirms that the alleged association of autism and immunization is vague and delusive and those who choose not to immunize their children, in the view that they have a right to choose what to do, significantly contribute to the reemergence and spread of pandemic diseases.

In spite of the Venter’s contrary beliefs, government’s vigorous efforts to regulate on road safety, smoking and advocate for immunization do not prevent emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases. In fact, as implied by Schlosser, the regulation of the government on restaurants, constructions sites, food at grocery, services of the physicians, airlines, daycares, or any other business or product do not guarantee people safety. In essence, individuals still get poisoned from food at the groceries, restaurants and drinks from bars. Accidents still happen at the constructions sites, airlines or even accidents at the daycare centers have not ceased to happen despite serious government regulations (Schlosser). Unsafe or shoddily buildings mushroom in within the country. Also, cases of the physicians misdiagnosing and mistreating patients are still being reported in the country (Du; Heffler). In this regard, people are fallible and vulnerable to making errors, making intentional actions to harm others and willfully neglect certain procedures risking the health and safety of others. Thus, it is imperative to assert that regulations and acts enacted by the government have hardly ended these problems, and in fact, any attempt to increase regulations or strangely enforce the existing regulations will not ameliorate anything, either.

Another fact about the government’s alleged regulation of business firms operation is that, business firms takes immense caution on their relationship with their customers. So, in spite of a couple of unfortunate deaths due to workplace accidents or harm of the customers, businesses take responsibility and always hire inspectors or undertake to enforce safety regulations. This is due to the fact that, they are aware that any mishap or harm can lead them to losing their business and their freedom. For instance, the owner the owner of the collapsed factory building in Bangladesh was arraigned and charged in court for causing the death of at least 1,200 (Yardley). Consequently, business can lose on their profits, brand value and reputation due to damage done to the people like in the case like Volkswagen when they cheated on the emission control of its environmentally friendly diesel cars (Reitze).

So, if we cannot rely on the government regulations to guarantee our safety, what can we do? Imperatively, errors and accidents can be reduced when people are properly trained and willfully observe safety precautions. Typically, people have a right to boycott buying goods and services from businesses that risk their health and safety. Furthermore, because businesses are the major casualties in any event when they conduct or neglect safety precautions in their service delivery, they have a lot to lose. Hence, it is not in the businesses’ interest to be negligent, as it is not in the interest of the construction owner to neglect the safety of the workers and the public, or in the interest of the grocer or restaurant owner to harm the health of the people or the customers. Therefore, there two conditions that people need to ensure their safety and prevent themselves from any potential dangers; individual rights and choice and government sensitization.

First, it is important to note that initiating on something or using certain products and service without comprehending the basics of how the particular product or service works is similar to getting behind the steer wheel without knowing the road rules; you might still get what you desire however, you could be endangering yourself and the people around you. With regards to this, it is prudent to assert that as an individual I have the right to choose what to do to safeguard my safety. For instance, upon realizing that a business company is abusing my rights or selling products detrimental to my health and threatens my safety, I have the right to boycott purchase and of its products and services. Government regulations and protections are not required to compel businesses to protect the consumers or us. As an individual I have the ability to compel businesses to attune their services to the desirable standards, otherwise they stand to lose profit and customers because by boycotting buying or using their products and services will inflict them with dire consequences.

Often, we use products and services from various business entities on daily basis though; some individuals do not bother to actually understand the products or service’s safety standards. Government through its various agencies have attempted to push on legislations that promote safety and protect health of the people however, use of varied products and buying food stuff like the genetically modified food and services like road transport still get widespread attention.

Ultimately, there is a wide gamut of things that the government can do to keep us safe on use of manufactured products, while travelling by air, road or water, and on internet safety. In many times, we need to take person responsibility and learn about how to enhance our personal safety with regards to use of various products and services.

Secondly, instead of the company trying to force individuals to do certain things to guarantee themselves safety, or impose regulations on the use of immunization and use of products that prevent use of unregulated products from being used by the people – like eating food from the restaurants and using pharmaceuticals, government should endeavor to educate and sensitize us to be alert on the safety of products we use as well as protect our rights against the commencement of physical force and fraud. Ideally, this should be the major concern of the government, and it would be enough to discourage and prosecute any violation of rights of individuals by business and others. Certainly, we can decide whether to purchase products or use services from companies that have been qualified and licensed or with those which have not.

We do not require government to regulate our lifestyle or way of doing things or businesses due to the reason that in the interest of businesses to regulate themselves to attract large customer base and ensure they become our choice. Specifically in industries and transport where the products and services are important to our health and safety, food, health care, and automobiles, companies strive to come together and form independent certification organizations. If we have any concerns about our safety in using some products or services or at work, we have the responsibility to voice our concerns and ensure that we discuss with the right authority to correct the mishap or we boycott the use or purchase of products and service or stop working in the unsafe and health threatening environments.

While I personally concur on the need for an individual safety, I think the government should spend its money and political capital on ensuring people understand their responsibility enhance their health and safety. Then, and only then, can government regulations work on protecting people’s health and safety, because government efforts will be boosted by knowledgeable and sensitized individuals who lucidly comprehend their role in guaranteeing their own safety. If we desire for guarantee ourselves safety we should ask for less government regulation and advocate for our rights on choosing what is best for our safety and government sensitization.

Work Cited

Du, Huaijun. "Analysis of Misdiagnosis Cases for Acute Abdomen Cardiovascular Disease." Advanced Emergency Medicine 4.4 (2015): 26-29.

Heffler, Enrico, et al. "Prevalence of over-/misdiagnosis of asthma in patients referred to an allergy clinic." Journal of Asthma 52.9 (2015): 931-934.

Reitze, Arnold W. "The Volkswagen Air Pollution Emissions Litigation." Browser Download This Paper (2016).

Schlosser, Eric. Fast food nation: The dark side of the all-American meal. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012.

Venter, J C. A Life Decoded: My Genome, My Life. London: Penguin, 2008. Internet resource.

Yardley, Jim. "Report on deadly factory collapse in Bangladesh finds widespread blame." The New York Times 22 (2013).