answer English questions about the essay
nasser556
peermark_print_viewfinal.pdf
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 1/10
Print Options: Include Questions & Answers Include Comments Include All Reviews Include File Info
NASSER ALFAHAID'S PEERMARK REVIEW OF ANONYMOUS'S PAPER (0% COMPLETED)
ASSIGNED QUESTIONS
1. What is the title of your partner's paper?
2. How well do you believe this title engages readers and describes the essay?
3. What introductory strategy does the author use?
4. Discuss two strengths of the introduction, i.e. what did the writer do well?
5. Discuss two weaknesses of the introduction, i.e. what does the writer need to work on before the final draft?
6. How well do you feel the introduction HOOKS the reader, provides background and context to the topic, and identifies an arguable or demonstrable point?
1 of 5
7. What is the thesis? PLEASE write it here, as it is written in the essay.
8. What are the main subpoints of the essay?
9. Overall, how well do you feel that the essay is organized, moving logically from point to point? Please explain your answer.
10. Check each BODY paragraph. On average, does the writer have between 1 and 3 intext citations? on paragraphs lacking adequate support, please leave the student writer a comment indicating a need for source use.
11. List off at least six verbs used in the source TAGS.
12. How well do you feel like the author credits his or her source materials? Please explain your answer.
13. What types of logical examples or proof does the student writer provide in his or her paper? Give specific examples.
14. What types of emotional examples or proof does the student writer provide in his or her paper? Give specific examples.
15. Check your partner's source use. List below ALL source materials missing a TAG and/or parenthetical note. Additionally, please leave them marginal feedback on any problem areas.
16. How well do you feel like your partner summed up the important ideas of the essay in the conclusion?
17. How well do you feel like your partner provided closure to the end of the essay?
18. Go through and list the first word or two from EACH Works Cited entry. Then, write the page number(s) of the essay that the source was used on, just as we did for the Tactical Warfare sample.
19. Are there any source discrepencies? If so, please indicate them clearly to your partner.
20. Look at the Works Cited page. Does it say Works Cited?
21. Are the Works Cited entires in alphabetical order?
22. Are there at least six (6) sources listed?
23. Are there any source entries that appear incorrect, i.e. needing italics, the author's name needs inverted, etc. If so, PLEASE indicate which one(s) need corrected and describe what needs to be done.
24. Overall, how well do you feel that the essay demonstrates research and a grasp of the principles of 'good writing' that we have been working on this term? Please explain your answer.
25. 9. What grade would you give this essay and why. Please explain honestly (but respectfully) to the writer.
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 2/10
26. What two areas or suggestions would you offer the writer to improve before the final submission on November 20th?
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 3/10
"POLYGAMY" BY ANONYMOUS
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 4/10
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 5/10
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 6/10
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 7/10
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 8/10
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 9/10
12/1/2016 PeerMark Print View
https://api.turnitin.com/app/peermark/static/reviewer.asp?review_id=186352719&sessionid=cffe14f778f909cba9ea434e173b329a&lang=en_us 10/10
