paper about Realism/Liberalism/constructivism

profilewhadehua
ir_14_paper_info.docx

1. The main question of this paper is “The assumptions underlying Realist approaches correctly describe the realities of international relations today – the acute insecurity caused by the anarchical system, and the drive for survival and domination. Realism helps us understand why states are forever doomed to competition and conflict, and why there is such little hope for states to achieve significant, long-lasting cooperation. Realism is an enduring paradigm, as the behavior of nations, and especially great powers, has not changed for centuries, and never will. Realism is the most fruitful way to understand international relations.”

2. Some notes on the prompt: This is obviously a slanted and one-sided quotation, but remember that you will need to master opposing views as well. “Realism” refers to both classical and structural variants, but make sure to keep the two distinct, when necessary.

3. The essay should be in standard essay format. You must present the main arguments and counter-arguments from BOTH sides of the one-sided prompt, in a fair and roughly equal manner. In this case, you will need to give a full accounting not only of Realism, but also the same for Liberalism, plus relevant aspects of Constructivism and other perspectives. You of course can/should have your own position, but you must demonstrate your understanding of the two sides of the argument, at the minimum. Think hard about the arguments, counter- arguments, critiques, and comebacks. This means analysis, not mere description. You will not have too much space for lengthy historical discussions or current real-world examples. You will find that there is so much that you could write, so the trick is to include in your essay only what is most crucial and relevant. Remember to stay focused on the prompt.

4. -thesis statement of this paper should be broad and cannot contain personal ideas -constructivism is needed to be analyzed. -picking a side is optional -examples should not be the focus of the essay

Rubric for the essays

I. Substance and presentation

-- covers both sides, in a balanced manner; stays focused on the parameters of the debate

-- covers all core points, with proper emphasis on the most important arguments

-- presents materials in an organized manner (demonstrating understanding of the argument)

II. Strength of Analysis

-- grapples with arguments on both sides, assesses validity of assumptions and evidence

-- presents strong, thoughtful, deep, and insightful analysis (as opposed to mere description)

-- has a clear and analytically supported argument/conclusion

III. Effort

-- shows evidence of having really thought about all aspects of the prompt

-- incorporates insights from the readings (i.e., not just based on lecture or group work)