1000 words paper about native american in the 16th-18th century

Project Instructions

· condensing the content on our annotated bibliography into a literature review that illustrates the critical conversation about our topic (ethos) and what is at stake in the conversation (the “So What?” or kairos);

· identifying the critical consensus of our topic (catalyst);

· communicating our purpose by agreeing or disagreeing with the critical consensus (argument, or thesis) and identifying what it is;

· justifying our position (supporting our argument/thesis) with personal experience/observation (pathos), additional research (ethos and logos), and/or interpretation of that research; and

· articulating ways to move the conversation forward (e.g., propose a solution or conclusion, suggest further research, pose questions, etc.).

Caution: Entering a conversation often amount to us agreeing with the critical consensus on our topic and expanding on it using new evidence (“yes, and”), agreeing with the critical consensus but raising an alternative using different evidence (“yes, but”), or disagreeing with the critical consensus and justifying that position using opposing evidence (“no”).