Netflix Case Study
keahkn
grading_rubrics-cases.docxCase Rubric
|
TITLE OF RUBRIC: Strategy Case Study |
Course: MGT5170 |
|||||
|
LEARNING OUTCOME/S: |
Date: December 12, 2015 |
|||||
|
PURPOSE: Applying theory to practice and consistently using Strategy |
Name of Professor: Dr. Ron Steffel |
|||||
|
VALIDITY: Strategy Best Practices |
Name of Student: |
|||||
|
COMPANION DOCUMENTS: Individual Cases |
||||||
|
|
Earning maximum points in each box in ‘PROFICIENT’ column and / or points in columns to the right of ‘PROFICIENT’ meets standard. |
|||||
|
|
<<<<<<<<<< less quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . more quality >>>>>>>>>> |
|||||
|
Performance Criteria |
Basic
|
Developing
|
Proficient
|
Accomplished
|
Exemplary
|
Score |
|
States Problem Effectively
|
Does not identify the problem (4pts) |
Identifies a symptom
(8 pts) |
Identifies a significant problem (12 pts) |
Identifies a critical problem
(16pts) |
Effectively identifies the crucial problem (20pts) |
|
|
Analyzes the situation using tools and concepts of Strategic Management |
Does not present analysis
(4 pts) |
Vaguely analyzes material
(8 pts) |
Generally analyzes the situation
(12 pts) |
Analyzes some key strategic factors
(16 pts) |
Insightfully analyzes key strategic factors
(20 pts) |
|
|
Analyzes quantitative factors |
Does not present quantitative analysis (2pts) |
Presents irrelevant quantitative analysis (4pts) |
Generally analyzes the situation
(6 pts) |
Analyzes some key quantitative measures
(8pts) |
Insightfully analyzes key quantitative measures
(10pts) |
|
|
Generates realistic Strategic alternative Solutions |
Provides no realistic Strategic solutions (2 pts) |
Provides ambiguous Strategic solutions (4 pts) |
Provides Strategic solutions
(6 pts) |
Provides realistic Strategic solutions
(8 pts) |
Provides realistic Strategic solutions related to the problem (10 pts) |
|
|
Evaluates Solutions/ Selects Optimal
|
Selects without evaluation
(4 pts) |
Selects with little evaluation
(8 pts) |
Evaluates alternatives and selects one
(12 pts) |
Evaluates alternatives and explains rationale for selection
(16pts) |
Evaluates alternatives, provides rationale, and selects optimal Strategic solution for the main problem (20 pts) |
|
|
Generates an Implementation Plan
|
Provides no plan
(2 pt) |
Provides cursory plan
(4 pts) |
Provides an implementation plan
(6 pts) |
Provides realistic implementation plan
(8pts) |
Provides implementation plan considering major factors (10 pts) |
|
|
Writes at the Graduate Level
|
Does not use designated format or standard
(2 pt) |
Does not write clearly or in an organized format
(4 pts) |
Uses effective format, style, grammar, punctuation, and references (6 pts) |
Uses effective format and writes at the graduate level
(8 pts) |
Uses effective format and writes at the publishable level
(10 pts) |
|
|
Maximum score is 100% of points available for a given Case Study
|
% |
