I need help with research paper and the due is important.
Pato38
paper_two_instructure_.docxPlease research a different kind of culture or society from that which Solzhenitsyn wrote about, somewhat opposite from his experience in Stalin’s Soviet Union, a culture that had major beneficial effects upon its peoples at some point in its existence for at least five years that existed after 1900 which has, in your opinion, contained some heroes, who confronted that culture’s good and/or evil. Please use the Solzhenitsyn’s lens to further explicate that culture. Use a major point or a character from Solzhenitsyn ’s book, such as Solzhenitsyn , himself, as a lens with which to discuss your project statement about this culture.
Our next assignment is again based on your first paper using Solzhenitsyn as a lens; thus, there can be some extensions of the first paper’s use of Solzhenitsyn . After reading the book, you should have been able to clearly articulate what Solzhenitsyn’s philosophy towards good and evil was, and how he put those beliefs into his narrative. This second major assignment is one where you, as the researcher, are to find another society, with which you wish to discuss in a scholarly way, but using a lens, not a point by point comparison. Now, you can imagine who is actually practicing or has practiced the kind of philosophy that has been exemplified by Solzhenitsyn’s lens and the culture that those people have impacted. However, think what will this text allow you to do? READ in such a way that you can uncover Solzhenitsyn 's philosophies as these intersect with the ways of seeing that another individual having some connection with overcoming evil or reinforcing good also has. Look for the ways of seeing that inform the approach of their interactions with people. Identify where we see the traces of these philosophies (sometimes they may be explicit, they may actually quote the figure, but often they may only be implicit—so you will have to see and make the connections) in your research on your selected figure.
Here is the difference between paper II and III; select an individual in a relatively present time setting (sometime after 1970) where you can argue for or against how that individual has dealt with the problem(s) of good or that which comports with reality and evil or that which does not work in reality, using Solzhenitsyn or some of his as the lens with which to more deeply understand your individual. This part of the paper will need to explicitly discuss Your conclusions as to “good and evil,” with support, as always; thus, the reader can comprehend the stance you take in a more clear way.
To rephrase this assignment; please write a paper in which you argue some controversial point of your own using the lens of Solzhenitsyn as to the subject of good and evil as those issues have been worked out in an individual’s life in what you consider a heroic way, and then argue for that position by using specific examples from the books and sources, which you have selected. In this way you can employ controversy while still researching the facts.
Remember all the conventions, which will be necessary for a good paper.
As in the last paper, remember that your readers probably will not have read your sources. Thus, you will again need to use specific passages from the text to illustrate your understanding of your subjects and to argue for your way of seeing. You can also—if it helps to advance your argument—again draw from your own experiences in society, but they must be a different set of experiences from the last paper, or they must be framed differently. Keep in mind, however, that this is an analytical, not a personal, paper, so once again your experiential details should only be there if they help to support what you have to say about Solzhenitsyn and your selected extensions.
As in the last paper, as you write, keep in mind that your essay must fulfill certain conventions and expectations. An essay has an introductory paragraph, for instance, a paragraph that both grabs your readers’ attention and helps those readers to know what they can expect in the paragraphs to follow. Your opening paragraph should make it clear what your paper’s main argument will be and why that point of view is worthy of an extended piece of writing. This is the part of the paper which will address your project. The subsequent paragraphs will go on to unfold your argument in such a way that readers can follow your logic and passion. Readers must be able to see why you think as you do, and they will want to see specific evidence from the book that illustrates and supports your way of seeing. Clearly, you need to have at least one source that could be considered primary.
Your paper should have a title that suggests the paper’s topic and an introductory paragraph that unfolds your objective(s). This paper is due as a first draft being 5-6 pages long. You need to cite all information properly. This paper must have at least one long quote and two short ones, and it must have several different scholarly sources cited in each paragraph, showing a use of multiple sources to support your points. It must have at least 7 scholarly sources in the Works Cited Page.
