Political Science (complete)

Political science is an important body in the system of government since it offers an analysis of activities and behaviours that are being portrayed in the society, It is out of this that this body has the credibility to focus on human nature and the moral purpose of political aspect. In addition, the right of human being ought to be fostered in an appropriate for that will enable the citizen of a certain country to feel that they have the freedom in doing what they feel like with their lives. Hence the rulings that are given out are published in the constitution; this is after a bill has been passed in the parliament and becomes law hence it becomes constitutional and people can practice. On the other hand, if citizens violate the constitutional rulings that are set by the government some consequences tend to be faced. Moreover, a ruling might be illegal or legal this implies that setting of a ruling that is offered by the Constitution indicates that it is not right to do certain behaviours. On the other hand, the structure might implement a law that gives that credibility of certain behaviours to be legal hence; citizens can be in a position to practice them without any restrictions.

In this case, we are obliged to determine whether same-sex people should marry in California. Same sex people is the aspect of the same gender having intimacy and marrying. It is out of this that people who feel that they have the right to express their moral issues in a different way practice same-sex marriage. To begin with, California Supreme Court offered ruling on certain matters that the citizens of California felt that they should be addressed hence the legislative action on same-sex marriage was addressed. It is out of this declaration that was made legal that same-sex should may, by this the people from the same-sex would not have violated the law if married. This is because a law was passed in the year 2008 and was constituted in Article 1 of The Declaration of Human Rights. In addition, the article declares that all human being should be nature free and independent with this, it offers people the right to do what they feel is right for them since the constitution states that people should have privacy, enjoyment, and happiness. On the other hand, the Constitution contradicts itself by declaring only married women and man is allowed in California. However, this did not stop the people of California from practicing what they feel is right it is out of this that the bill passed by people of same-sex should marry and they will not have violated the law this is as stated in Article 1 declaration on human rights in Section 8 of the constitution.

Same people should be able to marry one another since it is practicing their rights, by this, it means that people should be happy with the constitution’s state in Article 1 in the declaration of human rights in section 1. This can be achieved if people are given the right to practice what they feel is good for them, and this can be achieved if two people in the same-sex feel that they are compatible and can start a relation the constitutional should not restrict them. It is out of this that same people should marry in California. Though when it comes to religion practice people feel that this is against the will of human kind behaviours since even the bible state does not support certain acts. On the other hand, the bill of people in the same-sex getting intimate was passed and published in the constitution mainly because people felt that they should practice their right in an appropriate manner without any restrictions. Since the people of California felt that the constitution should not grant preferential treatment to any individual that is a citizen of California. The main reason as to why the constitution does not specifically state if the people of the same-sex should marry is that it is a moral issue to the people of California. It is of this that people of same sex should not be able to marry.

On the hand, the constitution provides a better understanding of the people and their rights since same-sex marriage right is practiced and people feel better. As stated, the supreme court supports every right that human beings feel it is appropriate for them hence it protects the rights of the people who feel their right should not be discriminated. Though the Supreme had passed the law, a referendum was brought out that removed the same-sex marriage, but on the other hand, marriage has a right civil aspect that allows an individual to choose what is best for them. In addition, the constitution tries to portray a sense of equality, respect, dignity, and a sense of belonging to the people of California. It is out of this that people are in a potion to practice their rights because their values are upheld by the constitution. In addition, rights being apprehended and the people in the community treating individuals in a different form can affect the same-sex marriage. This implies that the community plays a big role in ensuring the same sex people can be able to marry in California.

The fourth Amendment does not support same-sex marriage thought it guarantee people of equal protection under the law that is amended by the Constitution. It is out of this that it interprets that all people regarding their gender or sexual orientation should be protected in their right that they feel appropriate for them. On the other hand, equal protection of public benefits of marriage ought to be practiced by the constitution, so the people will not be in a position to feel discriminated. In addition, the constitution explains how it shall deprive any person that violate law unless the right enumerated in the bill of rights. The federal law offers more benefits regarding marriage couples since marriage is a civil institution since California has the protected bill of rights (Newton, 2010).

In addition, the constitution recognizes then same-sex relation in a concise way since the right of privacy, which is constitutional. On the other hand, the court strongly relies on making its decisions on how the past practices are carried out and the religion factor that foster people to have moral support. With this, they are in a portion to come up with some conclusion on certain matters that will make the law be fully implemented in the constitution. In addition, the progress interpretation issue on how people understand the Constitution by this they are in a position to follow the condition term, With this better description calls for people to practice the expected rights. On the other hand, if people misunderstand the constitution they will do the opposite of what is amended in the constitution. It is out of this that California is law state clearly it supports and recognizes human privacy but does not state in any article about the support of same-sex marriage.

In addition, the federal government is more concerned about the moral issue but the other hand; it is not ethically right. It is out of this that the Supreme Court passes a bill that apprehended that right of every individual. On the contrary, every person in California has the right to practice his freedom in different ways without violation of the law. However, marriage for same-sex is not yet banned in California because the constitution understands and respects that right of every individual. There are different ways that can be brought out so as to take away the rights of same-sex marriage, for instance, there is that aspect of amending the constitution through the legislature which is difficult since this bill ought to be approved by different members from different houses in the legislation. In addition, the amendment must be prevailed by a minority vote of the people, which make it hard for the law to fight against the same-sex marriage. Sex marriage is an issue that cannot be determined by the federal level since it does not have the credibility to offer the jurisdiction certain matters. On the other hand, different issues tend to be brought out according to people views and understanding of the constitution. Hence, this makes it be a legal issue since different people feel that it is their right to practice what is rightfully for them this is the reason as to why the issues of same-sex vary from state to state.

Many side effects come along with the practice of human sexuality since it is developed by self-love, respect maturity and other factors that make the sex-male legal. It is out of this the church in general apprehend and recognize the marriage between adults of the same sex. California is based on a strong faith of equality, which support equality for same-sex marriage this is as stated by Shaman, (2008). As a result, California base the fact of same-sex marriage to the government since they have the concept of equality that should be given to every individual in the state of California. The president who is the head of judiciary allows same-sex marriage would eliminate the pain and injustice of discrimination were the only way that would allow people practice their rights, support, and protect non-traditional families. Freedom being the key point that the judicial youth to offer by fostering bills that respect the rights of human being. As a result, the same-sex have the freedom to marry one another. Besides, the church supports this right because it should portray equality in the community.

This right is well evident in the modern society perform same-sex ceremonies in the sate of California. Same-sex justice should be respected and with dignity since the rights in the marriage are practiced in a manner that is consonant with the practices of Christian values. On the other hand same-sex is practiced because it the society that people live needs more commitment which is made from love, besides then society is strengthened by the same-sex since people who are married are firmly attached. Moreover, laws are made by the people in the society and are approved by people in the same society hence they are in a position to allow same-sex marriage since it fosters unity in the community. It is out of this that limitation in the homosexual is not allowed serve the citizen’s right to marry must be based on protecting the society.

Sexuality is a core component of a human being, and that is the reason as to why the Constitution does not set any restriction by offering rule that will make a human being feel discriminated. Practicing Same-sex is a factor that helps people achieve satisfaction since it is a core component in public acknowledgment and committed relationship. Hence the federal government does not other option that to let people navigate their life since the court believes marriage equality in the right of civil marriage should be practiced in the community.

The federal government assures same-sex people who are intending to marry assurance of federal protection, which will recognize the marriage. On the other hand, the individuals have assured equality in practicing their rights just as any other citizen in California. This is the main reason as to why same-sex is made legal in California, and there is no violation of laws if equity and discrimination are portrayed regarding marriages. As a result, people who are of the same-sex are allowed to marry by the constitution of California. In conclusion, the laws that are apprehended by the state of California ensures that every right is favoured every citizen who feels to practice different practices. On the other hand, the constitution ensures that society security prevails and this can be achieved if only the laws that are amended and published in the constitution portray equality.

References

Newton, D. (2010). Same-sex marriage : a reference handbook. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO.

Shaman, J. (2008). Equality and liberty in the golden age of state constitutional law. New York: Oxford University Press.