Neoliberalism or Biopolitics paper
Voss-Hoynes 1
Kurt Voss-Hoynes
English 106
Dr. Kurt Voss-Hoynes
18 November 2016
What’s the State of a Nation?
Benedict Anderson’s Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of
Nationalism articulates that nationalism, or feeling as if one shares a space or set of beliefs with
another, began during the Industrial Revolution. More specifically, because of the decline in the
usage of “privileged” languages like Latin, the advent of the printing press, and the growing
desire to abolish rule by divine right— delegitimizing monarchies—citizens felt a more direct
connection with their “nation” and fellow citizens. For Anderson, a “nation” is an imagined
social construct “because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their
fellow members, meet them, or even hear them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their
communion” (6). In other words, because a nation is a structure that is vast and finds its power
and ability to connect people in ideals, border, or languages, all intangible, imagined elements,
its existence is imaginary. Furthermore, Anderson argues that nationalism, or an individual’s
and/or community’s sense of attachment or belonging to the nation, is a positive force; indeed,
by articulating that nationalism “thinks in terms of historical destinies,” Anderson attaches great
importance to the utopian elements of nationalism (149). As a result, Anderson argues that the
nation and nationalism are not linked to racism which facilitates the development of inclusive
nation-states. Such inclusivity, then, demonstrates that the nation itself should be a force for
good by creating the possibility for multiple modes of personal and communal attachment and
Voss-Hoynes 2
belonging. Individuals, then, are able to “feel” connected to other nations in such a manner that
traditional borders and boundaries are, in some respects, rendered obsolete.
While Anderson’s utopian vision of the nation and nationalism is one that promotes
unity, the idea fails to take into account national development as a result of resistance. In other
words, Anderson’s account of the rise of the nation and nationalism disavows those nations that
grew out of anti-colonial struggles. In the case of a colonized nation, there are already two
separate understandings of the nation and nationalism that exist simultaneously. More
specifically, there is the material or formal nation and there is the spiritual nation, which consists
of a national culture and which is the main site of colonial resistance before the political battles
with the colonizing force begins. This space, which Partha Chatterjee discusses in his The Nation
and its Fragments, facilitates the development of language, modern cultural forms, and
institutions outside of the domain of the colonial State. Anderson’s Utopian conception of
nationalism and the nation, then, fails to account for how resistance, which is oftentimes violent,
helps form nations and how this re-defines nationalism. This nationalism, an ideological product
of violence, both understands the importance of resistance and creates a space for this form of
resistance.
Originally written in 1983, Anderson’s Imagined Communities did not have the capability
to trace the role of technology and social media in the development of the nation and
nationalism. In the wake of the Arab Spring and the Occupy movement, I will trace the role of
technology and platforms like Facebook and Twitter in unifying individuals and developing new
models of a nation. For these movements, the nation become a space that is fleeting which, in
turn, redefines the role of “physical” borders in the 21st century. As a result, new, borderless
conceptions of the nation and nationalism speak to the idea of a globalized world.
Voss-Hoynes 3
Works Cited
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of
Nationalism, Verso, 2006.
Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories,
Princeton UP, 1993.
- Kurt Voss-Hoynes
- What’s the State of a Nation?