International Management
4-1
Chapter 4:
Communicating Across Cultures
1
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Chapter Learning Goals
Recognize the cultural variables in the communication process and what factors can cause “noise” in that process.
Develop an awareness of differences in non-verbal behaviors, context, and attitudes and how they affect cross-cultural communication.
Understand the complexities of Western-Arab communications.
Be aware of the impact of IT on cross-border communications.
Learn how to successfully manage cross-cultural communications.
4-2
2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Opening Profile: The Impact of Social Media on Global Business
Managers in international businesses are grappling with the question of how to benefit from social media networks
Social media are potential sources of rich information outside the normal chain of communication
Measuring the effectiveness of each source of social media is a challenge
4-3
3
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
The Communication Process
4-4
communication is the process of sharing meaning by transmitting messages through media such as words, behavior, or material artifacts.
There are several stages in this process in which meaning can be distorted. Anything that undermines the communication of an intended message is referred to as noise.
noise exists because people filter, or selectively understand, messages consistent with their own expectations and perceptions of reality, and their values and norms of behavior.
The more dissimilar the cultures of those involved, the more likely it is misinterpretation will occur.
4
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
The Communication Process
4-5
5
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Cultural Noise in the Communication Process
4-6
When a member of one culture sends a message to a member of another culture, intercultural communication occurs.
The message contains the meaning intended by the encoder, but the decoder’s culture ends up becoming part of the meaning as he/she interprets the message.
Attribution is the process in which people look for an explanation of another person’s behavior.
When someone does not understand another, he/she usually blames the confusion on the other’s stupidity, deceit, or craziness.
6
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Cultural Noise in the Communication Process
4-7
| Behavior | Attribution |
| German: “What can be done to make sure this project is completed on time?” | German: “I am giving him some responsibility.” Indian: “He is the boss, why is he asking me?” |
| Indian: “I don’t know. What do you suggest?” | German: “Can’t he take responsibility?” Indian: “I asked him for instructions.” |
7
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
The Culture-Communication Link: Trust in Communication
The meaning of trust and how it is communicated vary across societies
When there is trust between parties, implicit understanding arises within communications
Similarly, some cultures have a greater propensity to be trusting than others.
Guidelines:
Create a clear and calculated basis for natural benefit
Improve predictability
Develop mutual bonding
4-8
8
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
The Culture-Communication Link: The Globe Project
4-9
9
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
high Performance Orientation: United States
Present objective information directly and specifically
Low Assertivenss :
Sweden
Two-way discourse and friendly relationship
High Human Orientation:
Ireland
Avoid conflict, be supportive
Cultural Variables in Communication
4-10
Let’s Look
10
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Attitudes
Sterotyping
Social Organization
United Auto Workers (UAW)
Thought Patterns
The meaning of double lines
Cultural variables can affect communication via a person’s perceptions . The effects of these variables are interdependent and inseparable.
Attitudes underlie our behavior, communication, and interpretation.
ethnocentric attitudes are a particular source of noise.
Stereotyping occurs when a person assumes that every member of a society or subculture has the same characteristics. Astute managers deal with people as individuals .
11
Cultural Variables in Communication
The kinds of social organizations we belong to can influence our perceptions .
Examples of social organizations include one’s nation, tribe, religious sect, or profession.
The logical progression of reasoning varies widely across cultures. managers cannot assume others use the same reasoning processes.
12
Cultural Variables in Communication
Cultural Variables in Communication
4-13
13
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Roles
decision making and responsibility
Language
When “yes” doesn’t mean “yes”
Cultural Variables in Communication
nonverbal communication is behavior that communicates without words—though it often may accompanied by words.
“A picture is worth a thousand words.”
Subtle messages account for between 65 to 93 percent of interpreted communication.
Minor variations in body language, speech rhythms, and punctuality often cause mistrust and misperception of the situation among cross - cultural parties.
4-14
Nonverbal Communication
14
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
The Media for Nonverbal Communication
kinesic behavior—communication through body movements
Proxemice the influence of proximity and space on communication—both personal space and office space or layout
High-contact cultures: prefer to stand close and to experience a “close” sensory involvement
Low-contact cultures: have a “distant” style of body language
Paralanguage how something is said rather than the content
4-15
15
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
The Media for Nonverbal Communication
Object language/material culture—the way we communicate through material artifacts (office, cars, cosmetics, furniture, etc.)
monochromic cultures (Switzerland, Germany, United States): time is experienced in a linear way
polychromic cultures (Latin Americans, Arabs): tolerate many things happening simultaneously and may focus on several things at once
4-16
16
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
4-17
Forms of Nonverbal Communication
Facial expressions ; eye contact
Body posture ; interpersonal distance
Body contact
Clothing cosmetics; hairstyles
para language: Eg. Intonation, pitch, speed, etc.
4-18
Feng shui : Asian concept impacts Western business
Directing “Qi” for positive results
Placing objects in a manner to influence one’s self or others
American businesses have made changes to influence Asian business partners
4-17
Object Language/Material Culture
Communicates what is important to people of a culture
Open displays of wealth
Japanese meishi’ or business cards
Mexico: appreciating the architecture and family photos
Context
4-20
20
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
4-21
Context
Feelings and thoughts are not explicitly expressed; key information is embedded in the context
Personal and business relationships are more compartmentalized , communication has to be more explicit. Feelings and thoughts are expressed in ______
High Context Cultures
Low Context Cultures
Management Focus: Oriental Poker Face
“Oriental poker face” and “idiotic Asian smile”
American mask of confidence
4-22
Let’s Look
22
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Management Focus: Oriental Poker Face
Americans often have difficulty reading some Asian facial expressions—especially those referred to as the “poker face” and “idiotic smile.”
To Americans, who tend to put more emphasis on talking when communicating, these facial expressions seem to conceal the person’s real feelings .
Asians however, tend to put more emphasis on listening when communicating. Because the heavier burden is placed on the listener, the speaker feels less compunction to send clearly discernable message cues.
The cues that are sent can be very subtle and easy for Americans to miss.
4-23
23
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Management Focus: Oriental Poker Face
To Americans, silence represents discontinuity of communication and creates discomfort.
To Asians, silence is an integral part of the communication process and is used to reflect on messages previously exchanged and for crafting thoughts before speaking them.
Just as Americans are uncomfortable with the “Oriental poker face” and silence, Asians may find Americans overly blunt, confident, and talkative .
4-24
24
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Comparative Management in Focus: Communicating with Arabs
Arab culture is one of emotional extremes, and this characteristic is illustrated in the language.
Arabs are quick to “sound off”
communication is built on friendship, honor, hospitality, religion
Arabs are high-contact communicators
Time is the key in communication process: deadlines are considered rude and pushy
4-25
25
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Communication Channels
4-26
26
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Information systems
Speed of information flow and use
Informal sources of information
4-24
Information Systems
In centralized organizational structures as in South America, most information originates from top managers
In the US information flows from the staff to managers
Japan: ringi system (consensual decision making)
High context cultures: information spreads rapidly and freely
4-25
Informal Sources of Information
Employees drinking together
Communication based on long-term relationships
“Public self” vs. “Private self” (Japanese keep a strong barrier between each.)
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
28
4-26
Speed of Information
Americans expect to give and receive information very quickly and clearly
French use slower message channels of deep relationships, culture, mediators
4-27
Japanese “Ningensei” vs. US Adversial Style
The Japanese ningensei style of communication emphasizes saving and giving face .
Public disagreement is avoided at all costs.
Indirect verbal and non-verbal communication; non-confrontational
Relationship communication; ambiguous
group orientation
Softer, sympathetic
Direct, confrontational communication accepted
Task communication, to-the-point
individualistic
Favors “odd” reason
4-31
Information Technology
Be aware of the impact of IT on cross-border communications.
Information Technology: Going Global and Acting Local
Global reach does not necessarily mean global business
The Web is interpersonal, but may require greater cultural sensitivity
Global online strategy must also be multi-local
4-32
32
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
4-30
For example Google “ street view ” Makes Friends in Japan but Clashes with European Culture
March 2011 Japan earthquake: “person finder”, digital images of the disaster zone
Switzerland, Germany: violation of privacy laws
Successfully Managing Cross-Cultural Communication
Develop cultural sensitivity
Anticipate the meaning the receiver will get.
Careful encoding
Use words, pictures, and gestures.
Avoid slang, idioms, regional sayings.
selective Transmission
Build relationships, face-to-face if possible.
Careful decoding of feedback
Get feedback from multiple parties.
Improve listening and observation skills.
Appropriate follow actions
handshake
Full legal contract
Or somewhere between the two????
4-34
34
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Facilitating Intercultural Communication
4-35
There is a connection between a person’s personality traits and the ability to adapt to the host – country’s environment—including the ability to communicate within that environment.
35
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall
Openness
Open mindedness, tolerance for ambiguity, and extrovertedness
Resilience
Having an internal locus of control , persistence, a tolerance for ambiguity, and resourcefulness
4-34
Conclusion
cultural sensitivity
Awareness of potential sources of cultural noise
Culture is the foundation of communication
High-context vs. low context
Careful encoding and selective transmission
Cultural localization on the internet