Summary 300 word 2. Evaluating Source 200 word 3. the station
you can do it
traapsheet..docxEnglish 102
Evaluating Sources
Building from our discussion of TRAAP, your group will need to complete a copy of this chart for each web source that you plan to use in your Group Annotated Bibliography and include it after the source in the Annotated Bibliography. While physical copies are only required for Web Sources, you should use this criteria to create the evaluative summaries in ALL sources This chart should help you eliminate weaker sources and see how other sources need to be qualified.
Type of Source: Web Source
|
Criteria |
Evidence—What do I see or notice about my source for each of the criteria? Include examples of strong and weak areas. |
Judgment—Based on the criteria for an ideal website and based on the evidence that I have found, how does my source compare? |
|
Timeliness—what should an “ideal” source do or include? |
|
My source is good source and help me with good information |
|
Relevance-- what should an “ideal” source do or include? |
|
|
|
Authority-- what should an “ideal” source do or include? |
|
|
|
Accuracy-- what should an “ideal” source do or include? |
|
|
|
Purpose-- what should an “ideal” source do or include? |
|
|
|
Other Aspects-- what should an “ideal” source do or include? |
|
|
FINAL JUDGMENT: How do the criteria “add up” to an overall evaluation? Which criteria are most important in shaping your final judgment?
This article was written recently so I know the information is up to date. The article has acted as a good source of information covering a wide spectrum of ideas. It has detailed information on the issue about animals being used as specimens by biologists and psychologists in their line of work. It is also used during training in learning institutions and research laboratories. This article has played an integral part in discouraging the use of these animals in a cruel way. It is keen to advocate on the use of other methods that are not insensitive, harm the animal, or kill it by using oppressive techniques such as dissecting and experimentation. In addition, the article cites that the non-animal learning techniques are very effective in the teaching practices of biological processes and the anatomy of these animals which I fully support.
This article is more reliable as a source of information since the researchers, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is a well renowned American animal rights organization that advocates against animal testing and animals in entertainment. PETA also goes deeper and is dynamic in ensuring that they interrogate the big picture on the negative effects that these animal testing’s have on the people or trainees. It’s evident that some become insensitive to animals while others may be traumatized thus discouraging careers related to this issue. To this extent therefore, the information is beneficial to any readers and practitioners in this field thus the widespread protection of animals.(AH)
