paper 1
|
Grading Criteria: Strategic Planning Report HCS/589 Version 2 |
1 |
Grading Criteria
Strategic Planning Report
Please use the attached Rubric as a guide for completing your assignment. This is the format we use for grading and makes a good outline for your paper. I would suggest using each of the criteria of the Rubric as headings for your paper so that you do not miss important parts of the assignment.
|
Content 60 Percent |
Points Available 4.2 |
Points Earned X/4.2 |
Additional Comments: |
|
The report includes the answers to the following: · What are the major components of strategic management, and why is each component needed for success? · Why are an organization’s mission and values important to strategy formulation? · What benefits does a strategic management process bring to a health care organization? · How does strategic management affect organizational decision making and financial performance? · How does strategic management affect the way an organization responds to its environment?
|
|
|
|
|
Organization/Development 20 Percent |
Points Available 1.4 |
Points Earned X/1.4 |
Additional Comments: |
|
· The report is 750 to 1,050 words in length. · The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. · The conclusion is logical, flows, and reviews the major points. · Cites 2 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar resources. |
|
|
|
|
Mechanics 20 Percent |
Points Available 1.4 |
Points Earned X/1.4 |
Additional Comments: |
|
· The paper, including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and is formatted according to APA guidelines and meets requirements. · Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. · The paper effectively uses headings, font styles, and white space. · Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Copyright © 2015 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.