|
|
Unsatisfactory
1
|
Emerging
2
|
Proficient
3
|
Exemplary
4
|
Score
|
|
Assignment Components
|
|
Integrated how your specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.
|
How a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment was not reflected in the assignment.
|
Identified but not described how a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.
|
Identified and briefly described with missing elements of how a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.
|
Identified correctly and thoroughly described how a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.
|
[Score x 10 = 40 pts]
|
|
Explained all four aspects of your personality gleaned from the assessment.
|
Assignment identified one aspect from assessment.
|
Identification of two or three aspects from assessment.
|
Identification of four aspects from assessment but missed some elements.
|
Identified and thoroughly explained four aspects from assessment.
|
[Score x 5 = 20 pts]
|
|
Included at least 2 journal article references.
|
Assignment included one journal article reference
|
Included two references but were not credible or peer reviewed.
|
Included two journal article references from a peer-reviewed article.
|
Included two or more journal article reference from a peer-reviewed article.
|
[Score x 5 = 20 pts]
|
|
Written Components
|
|
Organization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion
|
Introduction is limited or missing entirely.
The paper lacks a thesis statement.
Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.
Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.
|
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.
The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.
Transitions are sporadic.
Conclusion is present,
but incomplete or underdeveloped.
|
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background
information, and states the topic.
The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.
Transitions are
appropriate and help
the flow of ideas.
Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.
|
Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling
and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.
The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.
Thoughtful transitions
clearly show how ideas relate.
Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.
|
[Score x 2 = 8 pts]
|
|
Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling
Sentence structure
|
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.
|
Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.
|
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.
|
The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.
|
[Score x 2 =8 pts]
|
|
APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations
|
No attempt at APA
format.
|
APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.
|
Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted,
and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called
for. Errors present are somewhat minor.
|
Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called
for. Only a few minor errors present.
|
[Score x 1 = 4 pts]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
Timeliness
|
|
|
|
|
Late Work penalty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Score
|
/ 100
|
tapyaheka3z
nsg4029_rubric.docx
