response analysis

sandyp86

self_analysis_-_rubric.docx

Home >Psychology homework help >response analysis

CU_Horiz_RGB

Writing Self-Evaluation Rubric

Criteria

Needs Work

Satisfactory

Exceptional

Comments

1. Structure writing with all the following elements:

Introduction: Main points in order.

Main body:

· Each point made with evidence.

· Analysis.

Conclusion: Main points summarized.

References.

Does not contain all elements.

Contains all elements.

Contains all elements and each is clearly identified for the reader.

The structure of the post is half way good with an excellent introduction but a failing body. The introduction is also somewhat vague and difficult to understand, but the content becomes clearer as one approaches the conclusion. The perfect end gives the post the credit it deserves. The post also has excellent reference but fails to cite the research

2. Follow MEAL plan for paragraph structure.

Main idea stated clearly.

Evidence sentence(s) presented.

Evidence sentence(s) cited.

Analysis (or other critical thinking) presented.

Link to the next paragraph offered.

Does not contain all elements of the MEAL plan.

Contains all elements of the MEAL plan.

Follows the MEAL plan and extends critical analysis.

The post agrees with the MEAL plan. The breakdown starts with stating the main idea then delves to the evidence can citation of proof sentences. Moreover, it is the critical thinking of the paper that makes it look outstanding together with its ability to link one idea to the next in the successful paragraphs.

3. Use appropriate documentation style.

Follows APA format and style.

Incorporates internal citations correctly.

Presents references correctly.

Does not follow two or more elements or has two or more errors.

Does not follow one element or has one error.

Follows all elements and has no errors.

The post follows the APA witting style guide. All references and citation play to reinforce an idea in the post and above all the citation corresponds with the reference. Correct internal citation makes the paper outstanding.

4. Use appropriate voice and tone.

Uses appropriate tone for the assignment.

Uses concrete language.

Uses signal phrases to separate self from sources.

Does not follow two or more elements.

Follow all but one element.

Follows all elements.

The post uses appropriate tone while addressing the thesis. It neither picks sides nor discriminates on the one hand and uses a balanced tone. The language in use is pure and open allowing readers to make their conclusions. However, towards the end, it concentrates on one idea and act as a leading post and not a public post

5. Write in genuine third person.

Does not write in genuine third person.

Writes in genuine third person throughout most of the assignment.

Consistently writes in genuine third person.

Third person reporting approach is the main tense of the post. The use of this tense makes the writer narrate in the view point of a witness that is fair and open to all.

Writing Self

Evaluation

Rubric

Criteria

Needs Work

Satisfactory

Exceptional

Comments

1. Structur

writing with all

the following elements:

Introduction

Main

points in order.

Main body

Each point made

with evidence.

Analysis.

Conclusion

Main

points summarized.

References.

Does not contain all

elements.

Contains all

elements.

Contains all

elements and each

is clearly identified

for the reader.

The structure of the post is

half way good with an

excellent introduction but a

failing body. The introduction

is also somewhat vague and

difficult to understand, but the

content becomes clearer as

one approaches the

conclusion. The perfect end

gives the p

ost the credit it

deserves. The post also has

excellent reference but fails to

cite the research

2. Follow MEAL plan for

paragraph structure.

Main idea stated

clearly.

Evidence sentence(s)

presented.

Evidence sentence(s)

cited.

Analysis (or other

critical thinking)

presented.

Does not contain

all

element

of the

MEAL plan.

Contains all

ements of the

MEAL plan.

Follows the MEAL

plan and extends

critical analysis.

The post agrees with the

MEAL plan. The breakdown

starts with stating the main

idea then delves to the

evidence can citation of proof

sentences. Moreover, it i

s the

critical thinking of the paper

that makes it look outstanding

together with its ability to link

one idea to the next in the

successful paragraphs.

Writing Self-Evaluation Rubric

Criteria

Needs Work

Satisfactory

Exceptional

Comments

1. Structure writing with all

the following elements:

 Introduction: Main

points in order.

 Main body:

o Each point made

with evidence.

o Analysis.

 Conclusion: Main

points summarized.

 References.

Does not contain all

elements.

Contains all

elements.

Contains all

elements and each

is clearly identified

for the reader.

The structure of the post is

half way good with an

excellent introduction but a

failing body. The introduction

is also somewhat vague and

difficult to understand, but the

content becomes clearer as

one approaches the

conclusion. The perfect end

gives the post the credit it

deserves. The post also has

excellent reference but fails to

cite the research

2. Follow MEAL plan for

paragraph structure.

 Main idea stated

clearly.

 Evidence sentence(s)

presented.

 Evidence sentence(s)

cited.

 Analysis (or other

critical thinking)

presented.

Does not contain all

elements of the

MEAL plan.

Contains all

elements of the

MEAL plan.

Follows the MEAL

plan and extends

critical analysis.

The post agrees with the

MEAL plan. The breakdown

starts with stating the main

idea then delves to the

evidence can citation of proof

sentences. Moreover, it is the

critical thinking of the paper

that makes it look outstanding

together with its ability to link

one idea to the next in the

successful paragraphs.