For KIM WOODS

analysis.docx

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Management homework help >For KIM WOODS

Select a scholarly article, interview, or case study that intersects with or illuminates the leadership concepts we are learning in this course. Your jobs are to: research and locate a resource that fits the criteria and post this resource with a 250-300 word reflection on the resource. You will then work as a group to reply and discuss each of the resources and the information/issues/concepts present.

You will be evaluated along two dimensions for this project: the quality of the resource (relevance and content) and your initial reflective analysis and your group participation (individual).

Group Evaluation Rubric

Dimensions

Meets

Subpar/Suboptimal

Fails to Meet

Substantive Content

3.5 points

You select and cite an appropriate article, interview, or case study that intersects with or illuminates the appropriate course concepts. You provide a relevant and reflective 250-300 word analysis of why the material was selected and how it connects to the course. Well written, no typos.

Accurate and fitting application of course concepts/including the major relevant concepts

3.5

You select and cite a marginally appropriate article, interview, or case study that may intersects with or illuminate the appropriate course concepts. You provide a marginally relevant and reflective 250-300 word analysis of why the material was selected and how it connects to the course. Marginally accurate and fitting application of course concepts/including the major relevant concepts.

Questionable writing, some typos.

You select and do not cite an inappropriate article, interview, or case study that does not directly intersect with or illuminate the appropriate course concepts. You do not provide a relevant and reflective analysis (too many or too few words) of why the material was selected and how it connects to the course. Application of course concepts/including the major relevant concepts are not accurate and fitting.

Poorly written, many typos.

Group Engagement

3.5 points

You post your materials on time and then reply/contribute substantively to each discussion post provided. You follow up on any questions posed.

3.5

You post your materials on time and then reply/contribute substantively to some of the discussion posts provided. You follow up on some questions posed.

You do not post your materials on time and/or fail to reply/contribute to your group members discussion post provided. You do not follow up on any questions posed.