DUE: 10/24/2016 @ 10 pm est. ((one page for $7)) **please charge the whole $7. THXS!
1. Explain the role special interest groups play in their effort to influence legislation that dictates reentry and rehabilitation policy.
While public policies that dictate reentry and rehabilitation of offenders are determined by local, state and national legislative bodies, Marion and Oliver (2012) highlight that special interest groups have a powerful influence on the policymaking process. Presently, these groups influence policymaking through problem identification; identifying problems with the current reentry and rehabilitation programs and pushing for the creation of policies that become a rational solution to an existing problem. This will help increase the effectiveness of offender rehabilitation and reentry (Marion & Oliver, 2012).
2. Then from a macro perspective, should there be so many access points that allow special interest groups to access legislators?
Yes, more access points should be established to allow special interest groups to access legislators. This way, they can influence many policies and changes within the criminal justice system in a manner that benefits the members of the public because a majority of special interest groups fight for the rights of special populations like special needs offenders (Bohm, 2014).
3. What are the negatives to allowing special interest groups to have an active role in political campaigns?
References
Bohm, R. M. (2014). Capital punishment. In S. L. Mallicoat & C. L. Gardiner (Eds.), Criminal justice policy (pp. 293-306). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Marion, N. E., & Oliver, W. M. (2012). The public policy of crime and criminal justice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
1.
Explain the role special interest groups play in their effort to influence legislation that
dictates reentry and rehabilitation policy.
While public policies that dictate reentry and rehabilitation of offenders
are determined
by local, state and national legislative bodies, Marion and Oliver (2012) highlight that special
interest groups have a powerful influence on the policymaking process. Presently, these groups
influence policymaking through problem identification; identify
ing problems with the current
reentry and rehabilitation programs and pushing for the creation of policies that become a
rational solution to an existing problem.
This will
help increase the effectiveness of offender
rehabilitation and reentry (Marion & Ol
iver, 2012).
2.
Then from a macro perspective, should there be so many access points that allow special
interest groups to access legislators?
Yes, more access points should be established to allow special interest gro
ups to access
legislators. This way, th
ey
can influence many policies and changes within the criminal justice
system in a manner that benefits the members of the public because a majority of special interest
groups fight for the rights of special populations like special needs offenders (Bohm,
2014).
3.
What are the negatives to allowing special interest groups to have an active role in political
campaigns?
Potential negatives associated with allowing special interest groups to have an active
role
in political campaigns include the fact that some
special interest groups represent the needs of a
small group of people or organizations rather than the country as a whole. For instance, special
1. Explain the role special interest groups play in their effort to influence legislation that
dictates reentry and rehabilitation policy.
While public policies that dictate reentry and rehabilitation of offenders are determined
by local, state and national legislative bodies, Marion and Oliver (2012) highlight that special
interest groups have a powerful influence on the policymaking process. Presently, these groups
influence policymaking through problem identification; identifying problems with the current
reentry and rehabilitation programs and pushing for the creation of policies that become a
rational solution to an existing problem. This will help increase the effectiveness of offender
rehabilitation and reentry (Marion & Oliver, 2012).
2. Then from a macro perspective, should there be so many access points that allow special
interest groups to access legislators?
Yes, more access points should be established to allow special interest groups to access
legislators. This way, they can influence many policies and changes within the criminal justice
system in a manner that benefits the members of the public because a majority of special interest
groups fight for the rights of special populations like special needs offenders (Bohm, 2014).
3. What are the negatives to allowing special interest groups to have an active role in political
campaigns?
Potential negatives associated with allowing special interest groups to have an active role
in political campaigns include the fact that some special interest groups represent the needs of a
small group of people or organizations rather than the country as a whole. For instance, special