DUE: 10/30/2016 @ 3 pm est. ((one page for $5)) **please charge the whole $5. THXS!

As you examine the court initiated criminal justice policies, what do you see as the most promising programs?

The Center for Court Innovation website provides several court-initiated criminal justice policies that can be implemented to create a more efficient and humane judicial system, besides aiding reformers across the globe to launch new strategies. The most promising programs designed to provide new ideas and solve problems include Newark Community Solutions, Midtown Community Court, Brooklyn Mental Health Court, and Bronx Community Solutions. These programs are touted by the Center for Court Innovation as the most practical approaches to helping victims of crime and strengthening neighborhoods in a manner that reduces crime (Center for Court Innovation, 2016).

Determine how these programs affect the other parts of the criminal justice system—the police, corrections, or juvenile justice?

The programs are considered to be critical initiatives aimed at increasing the effectiveness of fundamental parts of the criminal justice system. For instance, Bronx Community Solutions and Newark Community Solutions are programs that affect that courts by proposing the application of problem-solving approaches to non-violent cases. By so doing, the judges will have access to more sentencing options, especially for non-violent offenders. The Brooklyn Mental Health Court is a program designed to provide more meaningful responses to crimes associated with offenders with mental problems. Essentially, it’s a program that will affect the court and the juvenile justice system by putting more emphasis on treatment as an alternative to incarceration (Center for Court Innovation, 2016). Freudenberg and Heller (2016) highlight this approach to criminal justice being beneficial to the United States’ efforts to decongest correctional facilities.

It goes without mentioning that Midtown Community Court is a program that affects the courts as it proposes the administration of humane justice as a way to effectively respond to the needs of the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly with regards to juvenile justice. This program has already been implemented in other parts of the world. Freudenberg and Heller (2016) states that the most innovative programs are more like multi-faceted partnerships meant to lower crime in the most beleaguered neighborhoods while facilitating effective correction of the offenders

Based on government budget priorities, how does the court fund these initiatives?

The programs are often funded using grants from the U.S. Department of Justice, partnerships, and fundraisers. For example, the grants from the U.S. Department of Justice accessed via the Office of Justice Programs and the Bureau of Justice Assistance are used by the Center for Court Innovation fund the programs. Other sources of funding include organizations like banks, businesses, government agencies, and foundations that stake in the success of the neighborhood (Center for Court Innovation, 2015).

What effect does court-directed revisions to criminal justice policies have on overall criminal justice reform?

The impact of court-directed revisions to criminal justice policies has been linked to how they’ve encouraged diverse jurisdictions to shorten the arrest-to-arraignment time, in addition to emphasizing the significance of immediacy and access to criminal justice. Innovative policies and programs in criminal justice are designed to pave the way for more widespread and systemic reforms that facilitate the process of protecting citizens from crime, in addition to effectually reducing crime or strengthens neighborhoods (Frost, Monteiro & Strah, 2016).

References

Center for Court Innovation. (2015). Funding strategies. Retrieved from http://www.courtinnovation.org/research/funding-strategies

Center for Court Innovation. (2016). Operating Programs. Retrieved from http://www.courtinnovation.org/projects

Freudenberg, N., & Heller, D. (2016). A Review of Opportunities to Improve the Health of People Involved in the Criminal Justice System in the United States. Annual review of public health, 37, 313-333.

Frost, N. A., Monteiro, C. E., & Strah, B. M. (2016). Cost-effective and accountable criminal justice policy. Advancing Criminology and Criminal Justice Policy, 441.