Homework Solution
Benchmark - Disparity Analysis Chart
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
|
|
100.0 %Criteria |
|
|||||
|
35.0 % Population Profiles and Categories, including demographics, cultural norms, religious and spiritual beliefs, primary insurance coverage, education, medical conditions, and outreach. |
Population profiles and categories are absent. |
Population profiles and categories are present, but are missing relevant information or there is inaccurate information. |
Population profiles and categories meet the minimal requirements as indicated by the assignment instructions. |
Population profiles and categories are both concise and informative. |
Population profiles and categories offer select information that is revealing. |
|
|
35.0 % Paper on Similarities and Differences of the Two Groups |
Paper on similarities and differences of the two groups is absent. |
Paper on similarities and differences is missing relevant information or there is inaccurate information. |
Paper on similarities and differences meet the minimal requirements as indicated by the assignment instructions. |
Paper on similarities and differences is concise and informative. |
Paper on similarities and differences contains insightful information. |
|
|
10.0 % Research |
No outside sources were used to support the assignment. |
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. |
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness. |
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Research addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
|
|
5.0 % Concepts |
Main concept is not clearly identified and subconcepts do not consistently branch from the main idea. |
Main concept is not clearly identified and few subconcepts branch appropriately. Limited understanding of assignment is apparent. |
Main concept is easily identified and few subconcepts branch from the main idea. Only a basic understanding of assignment is present. |
Main concept is easily identified and most subconcepts branch from the main idea. An original and creative concept fulfills the parameters of assignment. |
Main concept is easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main idea. Projects exhibit the process of creative thinking and the development of an individual style. |
|
|
5.0 % Presentation |
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. |
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. |
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. |
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. |
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
|
|
5.0 % Synthesis |
Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, and/or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable. |
Synthesis integrates ideas, images, and/or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical. |
Synthesis integrates ideas, images, and/or objects, but does not fully form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements at times is confusing. |
Synthesis integrates ideas, images, and/or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is logical and justified. |
Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified. |
|
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. |
|
|
100 % Total Weightage |
|
|