Written Assighnment
Written Assignment Rubric
The following rubric shows key performance criteria for all written work and the projected possible points that can be earned at each
level of performance.
Needs Improvement
0-23 pts
Satisfactory
26 pts
Excellent
30 pts
Concepts
& Focus Points Earned
_____/30
Knowledge -The content demonstrates little knowledge and understanding of course
content. It seldom or never references
course concepts and rarely or never uses
appropriate terminology.
There may be unnecessary content or content that fails to focus on the critical
issues.
Failure to include or inclusion of poor quality references as required.
The content of the paper is inconsistent with the assignment guidelines and/or
expected length.
Knowledge -The content is mostly accurate and demonstrates some knowledge and
understanding of course concepts. It
references course concepts and sometimes
uses appropriate terminology.
Usually focuses on the critical issues as assigned.
Includes only some required high quality scholarly references as assigned (e.g.,
three); quality may not be high.
The content of the paper is mostly consistent with the assignment guidelines
and expected length.
Knowledge -The content is accurate and clearly demonstrates a high level of
knowledge and understanding of course
concepts. It references course concepts
and always uses appropriate terminology.
Clear consistent focus on the critical issues as assigned. Responds to the
purpose of the assignment in a complete
way.
Includes the required number (or more) of high quality scholarly references as
assigned (e.g., three).
The content of the paper is consistent with the assignment guidelines and
expected length.
Criteria
Needs Improvement
0-23 pts
Satisfactory
26 pts
Excellent
30 pts
Analysis Points Earned
_____/30
Depth of Analysis - Analysis is performed at a superficial level with little or no
evidence of critical thinking through sound
logic and reasoning backed up with
concepts.
Synthesis - Content seldom synthesizes information & perspectives. Shows little
ability to see the holistic view of how
Depth of Analysis - Analysis is performed with some degree of depth and usually
reflects critical thinking through sound
logic and reasoning backed up with
concepts.
Synthesis - Content sometimes synthesizes information & perspectives. Shows some
ability to see the holistic view of how
Depth of Analysis - Analysis is performed at the requisite depth and
reflects critical thinking through sound
logic and reasoning backed up with
concepts.
Synthesis - Content consistently synthesizes information & perspectives
at a high level. Shows a high degree of
Criteria
organizational systems and processes
interact to affect organizational
effectiveness.
Paper may summarize readings or case without proper application of ideas.
organizational systems and processes
interact to affect organizational
effectiveness.
Paper may present some summary beyond what is needed to analyze the topic.
ability to see the holistic view of how
organizational systems and processes
interact to affect organizational
effectiveness.
The paper presents original thought/analysis and does not merely
summarize from the case or readings.
Needs Improvement
0-19 pts
Satisfactory
21 pts
Excellent
25 pts
Organization
& Writing Points Earned
_____/25
The introduction (or conclusion) is lacking or doesn’t adequately align with the
purpose of the assignment.
The basic development of the paper may or may not be evident; points are not always
linked one to the other, paragraph to
paragraph.
The conclusion, if one, is weak in its development.
The thought process is not readily followed—ideas often don’t clearly flow
one to the other.
Sentences are sometimes clear but can be quite wordy and with some ambiguity.
Tone may be inappropriate or inconsistent at times.
Grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation rules are violated.
The writing style, format, and tone may be inconsistent throughout the paper.
There is a beginning (introduction), middle (body), and end (conclusion) to the essay--
paper is structured in support of its
purpose.
Most paragraphs are coherent and logical in structure.
The conclusion is adequately developed.
The thought process is followed—ideas are related but don’t always clearly flow one to
the other.
Sentences usually are well constructed and readable.
Sentence transitions are sometimes present to maintain the flow of thought.
Grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation rules are largely followed.
The writing style, format, and tone are mostly consistent throughout.
There is a clear beginning (introduction), middle (body), and end (conclusion) to
the essay-- paper is logically structured
in support of its purpose.
Paragraphs consistently are coherent and logical in structure.
The conclusion is well developed and ties back to main idea or to the thesis
presented in the introduction.
The thought process is easily followed— ideas are connected and flow one to the
other.
Transitions are used effectively within and between paragraphs.
Sentences are well constructed, consistently strong, and varied.
Sentence transitions are always present and maintain a clear and coherent flow of
thought.
Rules of grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation are followed.
The writing style, format, and tone are consistent throughout.
Criteria
Needs Improvement
0-11 pts
Complies with only a few or does not
comply with current APA guidelines.
Satisfactory
13 pts
In compliance with most APA standards &
guidelines (e.g., references, headings,
citations, spacing, margins).
Excellent
15 pts
Fully complies with current APA standards
& guidelines (e.g., references, headings,
citations, spacing, margins).
Structure/
APA Style Criteria &
Points Earned
_____/15
Other:
Total Points:
_____/100
Note: This rubric is provided for advance guidance. Please be aware that additional criteria may be added after grading has begun if
needed for a specific assignment and points reallocated accordingly.