For Prof Tutor Only (others will be deleted)
HSC 312: Final Project –Complied Case Analysis Scoring Rubric
The following criteria will be used to grade your Complied Case Analysis. Keep in mind that the score requirement described
under each score point on the scale defines the minimum performance that must be demonstrated in order to achieve that score.
Evaluation
Criteria
A
20 points
B
17 points
C
15 points
D
13 points
F
11 points
1.) Introduces the case
analysis by
describing
the ethical
dilemma
requiring
resolution
Introduction is:
• Comprehensive
• Includes a
thorough, clear and
concise description
of the case and
ethical dilemma
proposed.
Introduction:
• Includes minor
omissions in
description of
either the case
or ethical
dilemma.
Introduction:
• Lacks detail in
part
• Includes minor
omissions in
both the
description of
the case and the
ethical dilemma.
Introduction:
• Lacks detail
• Includes major
omissions in
either
description of
the case or the
ethical
dilemma.
Description is either
missing or contains
major omissions
throughout.
2.) Identifies the
primary
stakeholder
(s) and
provides a
description
of the
situation
from the
stakeholder
perspective
Description is:
• Comprehensive
• Includes
identification of
stakeholder
• Provides clear
stakeholder
Description:
• Has minor
omissions or
errors in
identification of
stakeholders or
in describing the
stakeholder
perspective.
Description:
• Lacks detail
• Omits some
significant
content or
contains several
minor errors.
Description:
• Lacks detail.
• Is superficial
and contains
multiple errors.
Description is:
• Missing or
incorrect
• Inconsistent
with selected
stakeholder
Does not identify any
or identifies
irrelevant
stakeholders.
3.) Analyzes the scenario
from the
perspective
of the
primary
stakeholder
and includes
a description
of at least
two ethical
theories that
relate to the
issue being
identified
Analysis and Description
are:
• Comprehensive
• Include responses
to all
subcomponents of
the question.
• Provides clear
description of two
or more ethical
theories and their
relation to the
issue.
Analysis and
Description:
• Include minor
omissions.
• Includes 1-2
minor errors in
regards to the
scenario of the
stakeholder or
the description
of the ethical
theories.
Analysis and
Description:
• Include a major
omission, OR
• Includes
several errors in
regards to the
scenario of the
stakeholder or
the description
of the ethical
theories.
Analysis and
Description:
• Includes a
major omission,
AND
• Includes
several errors in
regards to the
scenario of the
stakeholder or
the description
of the ethical
theories.
Analysis and Description are:
• Missing
OR
• Response
contains
significant
errors or
omissions
throughout the
response.
4.) Provides a reasonable
recommendat
ion based
upon the
analysis
presented
Recommendation is:
• Comprehensive.
• Clear and logical
• Summarizes key
points.
Recommendation
has:
• Minor
omissions or
errors
• Is clear and
logical
• Summarizes
most key points.
Recommendation:
• Omits some
significant
content and
contains several
minor errors
• Is clear or
logical but not
both
• Summarizes
minimal
points.
Recommendation:
• Is superficial
and contains
multiple errors
• Is not clear or
logical
• Summarizes 1-
2 points.
Recommendation is:
• Missing or
incorrect.
5.) Format Format is:
• Clear and
consistent.
• contains accurate
and proper
grammatical
conventions,
spelling,
formatting, and
referencing.
• Follows specific
instructions.
Format is:
• Clear and
mostly
consistent.
• Contains few
errors of
accuracy
• Follows
specific
instructions
with minor
omissions.
Format is:
• Clear but not
concise.
• Contains
multiple errors
of accuracy.
• Follows
specific
instructions
with multiple
omissions.
Format is:
• Not clear or
concise.
• Contains
serious errors.
• Specific
instructions are
barely followed.
Format:
• Is not clear.
• Does not
follow specific
instructions.