homework

profilex.sune8
homework.docx

When we discussed persuasive speeches, we covered 4 ways to organize a persuasive speech. For this week's discussion board, choose 2 of the 4 ways in which you could organize a persuasive speech and briefly discuss what they mean and why they would be a good choice for a persuasive speech.

The 4 ways are;

1. Problem-Solving Pattern

2. Refutational Approach

3. Comparative Advantage Method

4. Monroe’s Motivated Sequence

I want you to write 100 words for this topic.

And I want 2 replies for my classmate each of them 50 words

1- 1. Problem Solving Pattern: With this method you acknowledge that there is an existing problem and find a solution for it. Now to do this you need to show and persuade the audience that the problem is serious enough and then that there is a reasonable way to eliminate this problem.  This would be a good choice, because it would show the audience what needs to happen and how to make it happen and it is also straight to the point.

2. Comparative Advantage Method: You can use this when two different people have an opinion on a problem, but do not agree on the way to solve it. You explain your point of view and why you think it is superior and then list the shortcomings of the other persons point of view, and then once again tell why you think yours is superior. This would be a good choice, because it allows the audience to see both points, but gives you the chance to show them you are right and persuade them to your side. 

2- I believe the two best ways to organize a persuasive speech are Monroe's Motivated Sequence and Comparative Advantage Method. Monroe's Sequence takes steps that, if done correctly, draw the attention of the audience, list the importance of the topic, give both facts and opinions, as well as explains why the topic is important for the audience to understand. Once the audience has all of this information it will be easier to bring them to your point of view, or at least explain why your's may be superior. The Comparative Method focuses on the most important aspect of any argument or debate, noticing the other side. This allows you to take note of what your audience believes is correct and showing them both the pros and cons of their beliefs. In the end, however, you compare their's to your's and show that you have the superior belief.