Accounting

profilevjayala
week3_learning_team_c.pptx

Financial Statement Analysis

VICTOR AYALA PAUL FULTZ CARLOS MORALES

Jeremy pierce

EcO/561

OCTOber 31, 2016

Professor ANDRES HINOJOSA

Good evening, we are learning team C. Today we will be covering accounting and the regulatory environment.

1

Presentation Overview – Part I

In part I of Todays presentation

we will review and analyze calculations via

Northrop Grumman’s financial statements

In part 1 of todays presentation we will review and analyze the calculations via Northrop Grumman’s financial statements.

2

Profitability Ratio

Measures the income and operating success of Northrop Grumman

OPERATING MARGIN (TTm) (%) 12.82

Net profit margin (ttm) (%) 8.96

Gross margin (ttm) (%) 23.59

Period Ended 12/31/15 12/31/14 12/31/13 12/31/12 12/31/11

Operating Margin 13.07 13.33 12.66 12.41 12.40

Net Profit Margin 8.46 8.63 7.92 7.84 8.02

Gross Margin 23.98 23.36 21.81 22.13 21.30

(Northrop, 2016)

The first financial calculation that we will review today is the profitability ration. It measures the income and operating success of Northrop Grumman.

The operating margin measure the percentage of revenues remaining after paying all operating expenses. It is calculated as the trailing 12 months operating Income divided by the trailing 12 months total revenue, multiplied by 100. Operating Income is defined as total operating expenses.

Net profit margin is also known as return on sales, this value is the income after taxes for the trailing twelve months divided by total revenue for the same period and is expressed as a percentage.

Gross margin value measures the percentage of revenue left after paying all direct production expenses. It is calculated as the trailing 12 months total revenue minus the trailing 12 months cost of goods sold divided by the trailing 12 months total revenue and multiplied by 100.

Across the bottom is presented a table with profitability ratios for the last 5 preceding accounting periods. Review of this information is essential for external sources such as lenders and investors.

3

Liquidity Ratio

Measures the ability of Northrop Grumman to pay short-term debt and meet unexpected needs

Current ratio (mrq) 1.13

Quick Ration (MRq) 0.97

Period Ended 12/31/15 12/31/14 12/31/13 12/31/12 12/31/11

Quick Ratio 1.01 1.19 1.51 1.25 1.12

Current Ratio 1.16 1.32 1.63 1.39 1.26

(Northrop, 2016)

The second financial calculation that we will review is the liquidity ratio. It measures the ability of Northrop Grumman to pay short-term debt and meet unexpected needs.

The current ratio is the ration of total current assets for the most recent interim period divided by total current liabilities for the same period.

The quick ratio, also known as the acid test ratio, is defined as total current assets minus total inventory for the most recent interim period divided by total current liabilities for the same period.

A higher liquidity ratio indicates that a company is more liquid and has better coverage of outstanding debts.

At the bottom of this slide we have a internal comparison of Northrop’s liquidity ratios across the last five years. Comparing previous accounting periods allows internal company analyst and management to track changes in the business.

4

Solvency Ratio

Measures the ability of Northrop Grumman to survive in the long-term.

The third financial calculation that we will review today is the solvency ratio. It measures the ability of Northrop Grumman to survive in the long-term.

5

Calculations of Different Companies

As a team we Compare the profitability, liquidity, and solvency ratios of similar aerospace companies

The fourth financial analysis that our team will present is a review of calculations of similar aerospace companies. We compare their profitability, liquidity and solvency ratios.

6

Company Comparison Spreadsheet

He we have a company comparison spreadsheet that presents the profitability, liquidity, and solvency ratios comparatively for all of the companies.

7

Company with the Best Numbers

this company had the best numbers for each ratio

After review of the financial data our team noted at (X Company) had the best financial ratios in the industry.

8

Presentation Overview – Part II

In part II of our presentation we evaluate the selected companies:

In the second half of our presentation we evaluate the following companies: (XXX, XXX, XXX).

9

Financial Opportunities Presented by Companies

Evaluation of the financial opportunities

If we were going to lend money to one of the companies reviewed, it would be?

We based our decision on the following:

He we evaluate the aerospace companies financial opportunities. If we were to lend money to one of them it would be (xxx). We based our decision on the following: xxx.

10

Investment Opportunity

Evaluate the investment opportunity presented by the companies

If we could invest $100,000 in one of the companies, which would the team select?

The basis for our decision was …

In the second part of our investment opportunity we recommend which company, based on the number, that we would invest $10,000 in personal investment funds to. The basis for our decision is as follows: .

11

Employment Opportunities of These Companies

Evaluate the employment opportunities within the companies.

If we could work for any of the companies, which company would the team select?

Defend the team's decision

In our final slide we evaluate the employment opportunities of the big three aerospace companies. If we could work for any of them we would pick (XXX). Our decision was based on the following facts: .

12

References

Northrop Grumman Corporation. (2016) Financial Info – Fundamentals – Ratios. Trading Statistics. Retrieved from http://investor.northropgrumman.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112386&p=irol- fundRatios

Northrop Grumman Corporation. (2016) Financial Info – Fundamentals – Ratios. Balance sheet. Retrieved from http://investor.northropgrumman.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112386&p=Irol- fundBalanceA

References

13