marketing presentation speech

profilelur28
elevator_pitch_peer_evaluation_1.doc

MKTG 5001 – Peer Evaluation for Elevator Pitch

The evaluation of the elevator pitches will be done via peermarking. You will each be responsible for marking three pitches of other students. You must take this role seriously since your classmate’s mark on their pitch will be largely determined by these peer evaluations. Your job is to assess both the content and the presentation using the criteria below. For each of three evaluations you will answer each question and write at least 50 words of comments (be specific and constructive in your comments).

You will also be asked to invest you imaginary money (Garbarino Gelt; GG). Imagine you are an investor (like Warren Buffet) with $1,000,000 to invest. You are scheduled to hear three short pitches. From this, you will decide how to invest your funds. You may distribute the money anyway you wish; for example, evenly among the pitches, more to some than others, or allocate the entire sum to one of them depending on your assessment. Since investors are primarily interested in making return on their money, you should invest in the pitch or pitches that you think have the best potential to succeed. Please make sure that the sum of the total allocation is equal to 1,000,000 GG, you should make the allocation after watching all the videos assigned to you. I recommend watching the videos and entering your responses and comments, then saving but not submitting them right away. Do this for all three videos, until you are comfortable with your answers and comments (and investment decisions) then submit all three.

The elevator pitches will be judged on the following criteria:

Group Name of Elevator Pitch 1: _______________

Content

Ex.

V.Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Clear what problem the product solves

Clear understanding of what the product is

Target market identification

Revenue model clear and valid

Competitors reasonably identified

Competitive advantage is clear and compelling

Delivery

Ex.

V. Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Clarity of verbal delivery

Confident and appropriately energetic delivery

Good and even pacing

Logic of pitch structure: logically flow through materials

Stimulating and catching investor interest

Time used wisely

Time limited observed

Amount of Garbarino Gelt assigned

Mark assigned