ppt.pptx

Compliance Risk Assessment Fall 2016 Class 7 Stephen Paine Jay Holtmeier, Guest Lecturer

Compliance Risk by Area:

Anti-Corruption and Insider Trading

Recap of Class 1

Pfizer Case Study and Compliance Risks

Legal and Regulatory Incentives/Conflicts of Interest

Political Failure of Controls

Reputational Recidivism

Point of Sale/Distribution

Definitions

Compliance Risk is the risk of failing to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements resulting in a material loss (financial or reputational) or legal/regulatory sanction

A Compliance Risk Assessment is a framework to enable the evaluation and analysis of the overall Compliance risk (both inherent risks and control effectiveness) associated with a particular business area

 

Recap of Class 2

The Five Elements of an Effective Compliance Program

Tone at the Top

Enron Chronology: July 1985 Enron established through merger and by November 2006 entire senior management team has either been indicted or convicted with Enron and Arthur Andersen no longer operating

Corporate Culture and Communication

Codes of Conduct set the values for employees to follow and those values are based on Compliance Risk.

3. Compliance Risk Assessment

4. Testing and Monitoring

5. Chief Compliance Officer

Case Study: HSBC

Financing drug cartels

Permitting sanctioned regimes to process dollar payments

Claw back of compensation (including Compliance Officers)

Criminal charges for “failure to maintain an effective AML program”

Recap of Class 3

Compliance Tools/Controls

Advisory Function

Coverage of Front Office and Technology, Finance and Operations

Conflicts of Interest -- A Deep Dive

Conflicts of interest are inherent in the financial services business

Historical success of the industry has been managing these conflicts by eliminating or disclosing them

Top to bottom review of business operations to address conflicts of interest of every kind

Risk Assessments

Follow-Up

Policies and Procedures

Education and Training

Compliance Surveillance and Business Unit Review and Testing

‹#›

Recap of Class 4

A Compliance Risk Assessment is a framework to enable the evaluation and analysis of the overall Compliance risk (both inherent risks and control effectiveness) associated with a particular business area

1. Identifying Business Area(s) and Metrics

2. Mapping Applicable Rules

3. Identifying Key Compliance Risks and Themes

4. Defining a Controls Inventory

5. Rating Control Effectiveness

6. Determining Residual Risks

7. Scoring, Rating and Reporting

It’s All About the Questionnaire . . .

Compliance Risk Assessment Steps

Identify Business Area and Metrics

Map Applicable Rules

Identify Key Compliance Risks & Themes

Define Controls Inventory

Rate Controls Effectiveness

Determine Residual Risk

Score, Rate and Report

Phase 2 of the Course

Assignments

Listen carefully in class as assignments will be based on material from the sector presented.

Sector Risk

Listen and assimilate the material/lecture through the lens of the types of risks each of the areas present, as well as the corresponding controls – the 3/4 central boxes of the CRA Diagram

Be a proactive listener and ask questions or provide comments

Make notes of questions that you have or comments to discuss later

Compliance Risk Assessment Steps

Identify Business Area and Metrics

Map Applicable Rules

Identify Key Compliance Risks & Themes

Define Controls Inventory

Rate Controls Effectiveness

Determine Residual Risk

Score, Rate and Report

Recap of Class 5

Financial Services Regulation

Banking Services

Deposit Taking

Lending

Fund Transfers, checking

Securities and Investments

Buying and selling stocks, bonds

Participating in Capital Markets transactions

Investment Advisory Activities

Investment Company Activities

Federal Reserve, OCC, SEC, FINRA and CFTC, plus Exchanges

FINRA Regulatory Regime

Supervision

Self-Reporting

Case Study: Prospectus Delivery

‹#›

Recap of Class 6

Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Crime Risk and Controls

Anti-Money Laundering

Rule Mapping: Bank Secrecy Act, USA PATRIOT Act, EU Directives Proceeds of Crime Act

Elements: Proceeds of crime used in banking system

Inherent Risks of Clients – Client Lifecycle (Onboarding, Processing Transactions, Refreshing Information)

Geographical Location

Type of Client

Products and Services

Client Identification serves as the primary control: KYC -- Client Due Diligence and Enhanced Due Diligence

Sanctions

Rule Mapping: OFAC, United Nations and EU Directives

Elements: Penalties imposed by one country on one or more other countries/individuals

Client Screening as a control

Anti-Bribery and Corruption (ABC)

To be covered in Class 7

Suspicious Transaction Reporting

Filing a report with the appropriate regulatory authority when suspicious activity is identified

Strictly prohibited to disclose the filing of the report to parties involved

‹#›

Compliance Risk by Area: Focus on Anti-Corruption

With Guest Lecturer Jay Holtmeier

Jay Holtmeier is a partner in Wilmer Hale’s Litigation/Controversy Department, and a member of the Investigations and Criminal Litigation Practice Group. He co-leads the firm's Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Anti-Corruption Group and is a member of the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Working Group. He joined the firm in 2004.

Mr. Holtmeier's breadth of experience as a litigator includes service as a federal prosecutor, a senior in-house attorney and a lawyer in private practice. Mr. Holtmeier represents institutions and individuals in complex government and internal investigations and matters of corporate governance and compliance. He has particular expertise in matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

In FCPA matters, Mr. Holtmeier has represented clients in government and internal investigations involving conduct in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and Australia. He regularly counsels clients facing difficult FCPA issues in a variety of business contexts, and he has assisted clients in numerous industries in developing and implementing FCPA compliance programs.

Assignment 5

Assignment 5 for October 19: Identify and rank the financial crime risk areas for two of the businesses in your financial services company. Explain how the controls of KYC, transaction monitoring and SAR reporting mitigate these risk areas. Be prepared to hand in this assignment at the beginning of class on October 19.

Identify 2 business areas. You can choose businesses at the division level or more specific business areas under the division level.

Then explain how the three controls mitigate Financial Crime Compliance risks in these two business areas.

2-3 pages

‹#›

Tone at the Top Update

October 12, 2016 Resignation of CEO

New CEO Appointed

October 18, 2016 News Story about prior fraud warning

Compliance Risk by Sector:

Insider Trading

 

What is Inside Information?

15

Relates to the securities of an issuer

Not publicly known

Has not been disseminated in a manner reasonably designed to provide broad, non-exclusionary distribution of the information to the public

Material

It has “market significance” (likely to affect the market price of any outstanding securities of the issuer)

A reasonable investor would consider the information important in deciding whether to purchase, hold or sell a security

Would be viewed by a reasonable investor as having significantly altered the total mix of information made available to holders of securities

Inside information is also known as material, non-public information (or “MNPI”).

What is Material?

16

There is no statutory definition of materiality – it is determined according to caselaw, with significant room for judgment.

Courts routinely reject bright-line mathematical tests for materiality

Both quantitative and qualitative factors can be relevant to materiality (5% rule of thumb)

Information may be material even if it relates to future, speculative, or contingent events. When events are contingent or speculative, the test for materiality depends upon a balancing of both the probability that the event will occur and the anticipated magnitude of the event in light of the totality of the company activity (the “probability/magnitude test”).

Examples of Material Information

17

A planned offering of securities

Mergers, acquisitions, purchases or sales of assets, refinancing, joint ventures

Calls of securities, repurchase plans, stock splits or changes in dividends

Earnings estimates, changes in previously released earnings or estimates

Changes in ratings of debt securities

Expansion or curtailment of operations

New products or discoveries or developments regarding customers or suppliers

Changes in control or in management

Writedowns of assets, additions to reserves

Defaults on securities, bankruptcy or receivership

What is Insider Trading?

Buying or selling a security

With intent to deceive

In breach of fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust

While in possession of MNPI about the security

What is Insider Trading?

Legal Conduct

Corporate insiders (officers, directors, and employees) buy and sell stock in their own companies during open trading windows

When corporate insiders trade in their own securities, they must report their trades to the SEC

Illegal Conduct

Buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security

19

Legislative History

No specific prohibition on Insider Trading – prohibitions from various statutes and caselaw.

Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder

Prohibits fraud in connection with a purchase or sale of securities

Rule 14e-3

Prohibits trading when you have MNPI about a tender offer, if you got that information directly or indirectly from someone involved in the tender offer

Section 16

Insider liability for short-swing profits (purchase/sale within 6 months)

Regulation FD

Prohibits selective disclosure by companies

20

Theories of Insider Trading

Classical

Corporate insider (e.g., board member, executive)

Owes fiduciary duty

Breaches fiduciary duty by trading on MNPI

Misappropriation

Corporate outsider (e.g., Lawyer)

Trusted with MNPI in confidence

Breaches a duty owed to the source of the information

Tipping

Trading on MNPI received as a tip from insider or misappropriator in exchange for a personal benefit

21

Why is insider trading prohibited?

Ensure a level playing field

Transparency and integrity of the financial markets

Inspire investor confidence that the financial markets are not “rigged”

Unfairness of insider trading gains for those with informational advantage

Keep the US financial markets among the most respected in the world

Illegal Insider Trading in the News

23

Insider Trading: Controls

What is the primary control for handling inside information?

Information Barriers

And how are information barriers managed?

The Control Room

Insider Trading

What is the Control Room?

26

What does the Control Room do?

The Control Room is a central function that monitors the Bank’s Information Barriers and the flow of inside information throughout the Bank

The functions of the Control Room related to Information Barriers include:

27

Development and maintenance of the Bank’s Information Barrier policies and procedures

Maintenance of the Bank’s Watch and Restricted Lists and approving Wall Crossings

Monitoring the integrity of the Bank’s Information Barriers (i.e., surveillance of Firm, Employee and Client trading activity)

Reviewing Equity and Fixed Income research for companies that may appear on the Watch List or Restricted List

Pre-clearance of private side employee personal account trades and certain Firm trades

Providing ongoing advice and training on matters related to inside information and information barriers

Private Side vs. Public Side

28

Above The Wall

Private Side

Investment Banking Department

Public Side

Equities and Fixed Income Sales and Trading

Capital Markets

Research

Private Banking

Asset Management

Shared Services functions with no access to Inside Information

Internal Audit

Asset Backed Origination

Structured Lending

Solutions Partners

Private Equity

Shared Services functions with access to Inside Information

Prime Services

Inside Information Barriers

Manage the flow of inside information to prevent its inadvertent spread and misuse

Restrict the sharing of inside information from employees on the “private side” of the Bank (e.g., those employees working in an investment banking or origination capacity) to employees on the “public side” of the Bank

Consist of:

Policies & Procedures

Physical Barriers

Electronic Barriers

Monitoring

Training

29

Control Room Notification Procedures

Information Barrier policies generally require all employees to proactively notify the Control Room of activities that have resulted in (or likely will result in) the receipt of Inside Information

Employees must also inform the Control Room when they learn of material developments associated with an existing assignment or situation

This includes Inside Information received outside the ordinary course of business, such as:

from a company or business that the employee or the Bank does not cover or intend to do business with

from a friend or other social or professional acquaintance

from being the unintended recipient of the information (for example, as a result of overhearing another conversation)

30

Watch List

The Watch List is a confidential list of issuers with respect to which the Firm possesses inside information that has not yet been publicly disclosed, or for which a transaction has not been publicly announced

Enables the Control Room to monitor sales, trading and research activities in a subject company’s securities, and to validate the integrity of the Firm’s information barriers

Generally does not impact the sales, trading and research activities of the Firm, except in limited circumstances

The Watch List is not published and can only be accessed by the Control Room

31

Restricted List

The Restricted List generally reflects pending transactions in which the Firm is involved that have been publicly announced and in which we may have, or appear to have, inside information

The Restricted List also may be used for other regulatory purposes (e.g., to comply with the trading restrictions imposed by Reg. M or by the tender rules, Section 16, or if we own a large position or are an affiliate of the company)

The Restricted List limits certain marketing, research and trading activity that could constitute misuse of inside information or otherwise appear to be improper

The Restricted List is available to all employees via an internal web page as well as via direct feeds to trading systems and market data screens

32

Wall Crossings

Wall Crossing procedures must be followed when communicating inside information to public side (i.e. sales, trading and research) employees

All Wall Crossings require:

Prior approval by a designated senior executive;

Prior approval by an appropriate senior business line manager (a “Conduit”) of the person being brought over the wall; and

Consultation with a member of the Control Room

33

Insider Trading: Surveillance

Overview

Monitor Firm, client and employee trading activity in the firm’s divisions

Covers all products including equities, debt, derivatives and bank loans

Types of reports include:

Restricted List

Watch List

Over The Wall

Research Frontrunning

Restricted List Lookbacks

Watch List Lookbacks

External Deals

35

Scope of Control Room Monitoring

36

Product Coverage

Equities, equity-related securities and related derivatives

Fixed Income securities and related derivatives

Bank Loans and related derivatives

Investment Banking

Private Banking & Wealth Management

Business Divisions

Account Types

Restricted List

Watch List

Wall Crossings

Bank deal lookbacks

Non-Bank deal lookbacks

Watch List lookbacks

Research front-running

Firm (proprietary, client facilitation, hedge)

Institutional Clients

Private Banking Clients

Discretionary Portfolios

Asset Management Funds

Deal Types

Employee

Review Criteria – What The Control Room Looks For

Restricted List Reports

Whether the type of trading activity that occurred (e.g., firm vs. client activity, trading without approvals, etc.) represents a violation of the Restricted List

Over The Wall Reports

Trading activity by an employee (for the Bank, client or their own personal account) in a security for which he or she is currently over the wall

Watch List/Lookback Reports

Trading activity by employees on the private side of the Inside Information barrier (Above The Wall personnel, Capital Markets, etc.)

Trades by employees who are Conduits for or are part of the same group as wall crossed individuals

Trades by clients who have been wall crossed (e.g., through Market Sounding)

Activity that deviates from known trading strategies (e.g., larger than normal trade size, holding positions when they are normally liquidated at end of day)

Timely trades with significant profit potential

37

What Does the Control Room Want to Know About?

If an employee receives Inside Information

Trading activity while in possession of Inside Information (by employees, clients or the firm) or merely the appearance of (e.g., well timed trades)

Breaches of Information Barriers through the use of electronic communications or otherwise

Business changes that may invoke Information Barrier, Conflicts of Interest or Large Shareholding concerns (new businesses, reporting lines, physical location, booking systems, etc.)

Transactions that where the firm would own 3% or more of a public company’s equity securities (including through the use of derivatives)

Disclosure of personal accounts and pre-clearance of trades

Disclosure of outside business activities and directorships

38

Escalation Criteria – What We Do With Our Findings

Breaches by Employees (Restricted List, Information Barrier policies)

If following internal review an employee was found to have improperly directed trading or solicited/tipped a client in violation of CS policy, then standard misconduct, disciplinary and escalation procedures would apply

In cases of perceived or actual Insider Trading by an employee, Bank would contact the relevant regulator directly (in addition to filing a Suspicious Activity Report)

Potential Insider Trading by Clients

A fortuitous, well-timed trade alone would not lead to an SAR filing—it would require the presence of additional factors, such as:

Reason to believe the client had access to Inside Information (e.g., as part of a market sounding exercise, inadvertent email, etc.); or

A potential connection exists between the client and the parties involved in the deal (e.g., a principal of the client is on Board of a target company or affiliate); or

A pattern of the client trading ahead of other deals with a common link (e.g., same company, advisor, law firm, etc.)

39

Insider Trading Controls: Personal Account Trading

Employee Personal Account Trading

1

Minimum holding periods apply and, where applicable, are subject to pre-clearance (generally good until end of trading day).

An Employee account:

Is an account that has brokerage capability in which an employee has an interest or the power to influence investment decisions

Includes employee’s spouse, partner and minor children

Trading is generally not permitted in securities of issuers on the Restricted List.

Bank securities may only be traded during approved windows and with pre-trade approval, where applicable.

Many regulators require banks to monitor the personal trades of their employees.

In most jurisdictions1, employees are required:

To declare their trading account details to Compliance

To receive pre-trade approval for certain transactions

41

Insider Trading: Other Related Risks

Discussions with the Buyside

Discussions between private-side bankers and buy-side clients (e.g., hedge funds) implicate insider trading risk

Private-side bankers have access to MNPI that cannot be shared with buy-side investors

Risk that buy-side investors are “fishing” for information about companies or specific transactions

Banks may limit these discussions, or require internal approvals and discussion guidelines (i.e., industry discussions only)

Expert Networks

The investigation of the Galleon/Raj Rajaratnam case highlighted the risk posed by “expert networks”

Expert networks connect investor clients with experts paid for information and insight in the expert’s area of expertise

Risk that expert networks will share MNPI with investors using their services

Banks/investors may limit use of expert networks by requiring certifications (e.g., no inside information) and qualifications (e.g., has not been an officer/director/access employee of a public company for a period of time)

Market Sounding

Market sounding refers to certain communications with prospective investors prior to the formal launch or announcement of a transaction or offering

Such communications are intended to gauge investor interest in a transaction

In some cases, market sounding may involve providing potential investors with MNPI

Confidentiality agreements and trading restrictions may be required

Safeguarding Confidential Information

Private side Bank employees will come into possession of the most sensitive information.

What practical steps should be taken to protect it?

Avoid discussing confidential information in public places

Avoid leaving sensitive information on voicemail or with administrative assistants

Working off premises, must ensure that you keep information secure

Ensure emails are sent to the correct address and with the correct attachment(s)

“Clean-Desk” Rule - In the workspace, avoid leaving confidential information exposed and ensure that when you leave your office or cubicle you have stored sensitive documents in a secure location.

Case Study: Merck Insider Trading

Do you think Merck includes insider trading in its annual compliance risk assessment?

Why or Why not?

Should every public company have controls for this?

What could Merck have done to implement controls to prevent this?

What about Bank of New York/Mellon?

‹#›

Assignment 4

Assignment was announced as not graded and will not be recorded as a grade

Your assignment was; however, scored to give you a better sense of your progress and my expectations.

Grade Distribution:

Excellent (E): 3

Good (G): 10

Satisfactory (S): 6

Poor (P): 3

‹#›

Assignment 6

Draft notes and questions for an interview with the Head of the Head of Mergers and Acqusitions in the Investment Banking Division of your financial services company(Morgan Stanley) for a Compliance Risk Assessment of Insider Trading.

Develop an interview for the Head of Mergers and Acquisitions relating to insider trading and Rule 10b-5

The Mergers and Acquistions Department advise companies on who are either(1) looking to acquire another company or(2) are the target of being acquired. These transactions present challenges as the mere fact that a company is about to be acquired can radically impact the stock price and trading of both companies.

Your interview should include a list of questions but also include notes about potential answers that could require require follow-up

I want to see how well you understand the concepts of insider trading and your ability to transpose the concepts presented in class into a Compliance Risk Assessment situation. You can include questions that relate to both risks and controls.

This is your first full questionnaire assignment and while there was a request to see an example of a questionnaire, giving an example now might compromise the learning component of this exercise.

‹#›