CIS 348 Assignment 2: Business Case

assignment2_buisness_care_rubic.docx

Home >Information Systems homework help >CIS 348 Assignment 2: Business Case

Points: 85	Assignment 2: Business Case
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Examine measurable organizational value (MOV). Identify areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame for achievement. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely examined measurable organizational value (MOV). Did not submit or incompletely identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame for achievement.	Insufficiently examined measurable organizational value (MOV). Insufficiently identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame for achievement.	Partially examined measurable organizational value (MOV). Partially identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame for achievement.	Satisfactorily examined measurable organizational value (MOV). Satisfactorily identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame for achievement.	Thoroughly examined measurable organizational value (MOV). Thoroughly identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame for achievement.
2. Suggest at least two (2) alternatives to developing a mobile application. Justify the consideration of such alternatives. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelysuggested at least two (2) alternatives to developing a mobile application. Did not submit or incompletelyjustified the consideration of such alternatives.	Insufficiently suggested at least two (2) alternatives to developing a mobile application. Insufficiently justified the consideration of such alternatives.	Partially suggested at least two (2) alternatives to developing a mobile application. Partially justified the consideration of such alternatives.	Satisfactorily suggested at least two (2) alternatives to developing a mobile application. Satisfactorily justified the consideration of such alternatives.	Thoroughly suggested at least two (2) alternatives to developing a mobile application. Thoroughly justified the consideration of such alternatives.
3. Analyze the feasibility of developing the mobile application and your suggested alternatives. Weight:10%	Did not submit or incompletelyanalyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Insufficiently analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Partially analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Satisfactorily analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Thoroughly analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.
4. Define the cost of ownership of the mobile application. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely defined the cost of ownership of the mobile application.	Insufficiently defined the cost of ownership of the mobile application.	Partially defined the cost of ownership of the mobile application.	Satisfactorily defined the cost of ownership of the mobile application.	Thoroughly defined the cost of ownership of the mobile application.
5. Define the benefits of ownership of the mobile application. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelydefined the benefits of ownership of the mobile application.	Insufficiently defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile application.	Partially defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile application.	Satisfactorily defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile application.	Thoroughly defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile application.
6. Predict the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile application and your suggested alternatives. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelypredicted the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Insufficiently predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Partially predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Satisfactorily predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.	Thoroughly predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile application and your suggested alternatives.
7. Identify risks associated with developing the mobile application. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelyidentify risks associated with developing the mobile application.	Insufficientlyidentified risks associated with developing the mobile application.	Partially identified risks associated with developing the mobile application.	Satisfactorily identified risks associated with developing the mobile application.	Thoroughly identified risks associated with developing the mobile application.
8. Propose a final recommendation of whether or not the organization should develop the mobile application or one of your alternatives. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletelyproposed a final recommendation of whether or not the organization should develop the mobile application or one of your alternatives.	Insufficientlyproposed a final recommendation of whether or not the organization should develop the mobile application or one of your alternatives.	Partiallyproposed a final recommendation of whether or not the organization should develop the mobile application or one of your alternatives.	Satisfactorilyproposed a final recommendation of whether or not the organization should develop the mobile application or one of your alternatives.	Thoroughlyproposed a final recommendation of whether or not the organization should develop the mobile application or one of your alternatives.
9. 1 reference Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
10. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present

Points: 85

Assignment 2: Business Case

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum

Expectations

69% D

Fair

79% C

Proficient

89% B

Exemplary

100% A

1. Examine

measurable

organizational

value (MOV).

Identify areas of

impact, the

desired values,

and a time

frame for

achievement.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletely examined

measurable

organizational value

(MOV). Did not submit

or incompletely

iden

tified areas of

impact, the desired

values, and a time

frame for

achievement.

Insufficiently

examined

measurable

organizational value

(MOV). Insufficiently

identified areas of

impact, the desired

values, and a time

frame for

achievement.

Partially

examined

measurable

organizational

value

(MOV).

Partially

identified areas

of impact, the

desired values,

and a time frame

for achievement.

Satisfactorily

examined measurable

organizational value

(MOV). Satisfactorily

identified areas of

impact, the desired

value

s, and a time

frame for

achievement.

Thoroughly

examined

measurable

organizational value

(MOV).

Thoroughly

identified areas of

impact, the desired

values, and a time

frame for

achievement.

2. Suggest at

least two (2)

alternatives to

developing a

mobile

pplication.

Justify the

consideration of

such

alternatives.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletelysuggested

at least two (2)

alternatives to

developing a mobile

application. Did not

submit or

incompletelyjustified

the consideration of

such alternatives

Insufficiently

suggested at least

two (2) alternatives to

developing a mobile

application.

Insufficiently justified

the consideration of

such alternatives.

Partially

suggested at

least two (2)

alternatives to

developing a

mobile

application.

Partially ju

stified

the consideration

of such

alternatives.

Satisfactorily

suggested at least

two (2) alternatives to

developing a mobile

application.

Satisfactorily justified

the consideration of

such alternatives.

Thoroughly

suggested at least

two (2) alternatives

o developing a

mobile application.

Thoroughly justified

the consideration of

such alternatives.

3. Analyze the

feasibility of

developing the

mobile

application and

your suggested

alternatives.

Weight:10%

Did not submit or

incompletelyanalyzed

the feasibil

ity of

developing the mobile

application and your

suggested

alternatives.

Insufficiently

analyzed the

feasibility of

developing the

mobile application

and your suggested

alternatives.

Partially

analyzed the

feasibility of

developing the

mobile

application and

your suggested

alternatives.

Satisfactorily

analyzed the

feasibility of

developing the mobile

application and your

suggested

alternatives.

Thoroughly

analyzed the

feasibility of

veloping the

mobile application

and your suggested

alternatives.

4. Define the

cost of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletely defined

the cost of ownership

of the mobile

application.

Insufficiently defined

the cost

of ownership

of the mobile

application.

Partially defined

the cost of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Satisfactorily defined

the cost of ownership

of the mobile

application.

Thoroughly defined

the cost of

ownership of the

mobile application.

5. Define the

benefits of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletelydefined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

Insufficiently defined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

Partially defi

ned

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Satisfactorily defined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

Thoroughly defined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

6. Predict the

return on

investment

(ROI) of the

obile

application and

Did not submit or

incompletelypredicted

the return on

investment (ROI) of

the mobile application

Insufficiently

predicted the return

on investment (ROI)

of the

mobile

application and your

Partially

predicted the

return on

investment (ROI)

of the mobile

application and

Satisfactorily

predicted the return

on investment (ROI)

of the mobile

application and your

Thoroughly

predicted the return

on investment (ROI)

of the mobile

application and your

Points: 85 Assignment 2: Business Case

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum

Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Examine

measurable

organizational

value (MOV).

Identify areas of

impact, the

desired values,

and a time

frame for

achievement.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletely examined

measurable

organizational value

(MOV). Did not submit

or incompletely

identified areas of

impact, the desired

values, and a time

frame for

achievement.

Insufficiently

examined

measurable

organizational value

(MOV). Insufficiently

identified areas of

impact, the desired

values, and a time

frame for

achievement.

Partially

examined

measurable

organizational

value

(MOV). Partially

identified areas

of impact, the

desired values,

and a time frame

for achievement.

Satisfactorily

examined measurable

organizational value

(MOV). Satisfactorily

identified areas of

impact, the desired

values, and a time

frame for

achievement.

Thoroughly

examined

measurable

organizational value

(MOV). Thoroughly

identified areas of

impact, the desired

values, and a time

frame for

achievement.

2. Suggest at

least two (2)

alternatives to

developing a

mobile

application.

Justify the

consideration of

such

alternatives.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletelysuggested

at least two (2)

alternatives to

developing a mobile

application. Did not

submit or

incompletelyjustified

the consideration of

such alternatives.

Insufficiently

suggested at least

two (2) alternatives to

developing a mobile

application.

Insufficiently justified

the consideration of

such alternatives.

Partially

suggested at

least two (2)

alternatives to

developing a

mobile

application.

Partially justified

the consideration

of such

alternatives.

Satisfactorily

suggested at least

two (2) alternatives to

developing a mobile

application.

Satisfactorily justified

the consideration of

such alternatives.

Thoroughly

suggested at least

two (2) alternatives

to developing a

mobile application.

Thoroughly justified

the consideration of

such alternatives.

3. Analyze the

feasibility of

developing the

mobile

application and

your suggested

alternatives.

Weight:10%

Did not submit or

incompletelyanalyzed

the feasibility of

developing the mobile

application and your

suggested

alternatives.

Insufficiently

analyzed the

feasibility of

developing the

mobile application

and your suggested

alternatives.

Partially

analyzed the

feasibility of

developing the

mobile

application and

your suggested

alternatives.

Satisfactorily

analyzed the

feasibility of

developing the mobile

application and your

suggested

alternatives.

Thoroughly

analyzed the

feasibility of

developing the

mobile application

and your suggested

alternatives.

4. Define the

cost of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletely defined

the cost of ownership

of the mobile

application.

Insufficiently defined

the cost of ownership

of the mobile

application.

Partially defined

the cost of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Satisfactorily defined

the cost of ownership

of the mobile

application.

Thoroughly defined

the cost of

ownership of the

mobile application.

5. Define the

benefits of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or

incompletelydefined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

Insufficiently defined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

Partially defined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile

application.

Satisfactorily defined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

Thoroughly defined

the benefits of

ownership of the

mobile application.

6. Predict the

return on

investment

(ROI) of the

mobile

application and

Did not submit or

incompletelypredicted

the return on

investment (ROI) of

the mobile application

Insufficiently

predicted the return

on investment (ROI)

of the mobile

application and your

Partially

predicted the

return on

investment (ROI)

of the mobile

application and

Satisfactorily

predicted the return

on investment (ROI)

of the mobile

application and your

Thoroughly

predicted the return

on investment (ROI)

of the mobile

application and your