Research Paper- SDLC models
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: Reseach Papers
Description: Distributed Learning Research Paper Rubric. This rubric will be used for all three research papers in the course.
|
|
Unsatisfactory |
Emerging/Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Good |
Excellent |
|
Knowledge of Content |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 11.68 (11.68%) Work/participation does not reflect the assignment purpose |
Points Range:11.84 (11.84%) - 13.12(13.12%) Work/participation marginally reflects the assignment purpose |
Points Range:13.28 (13.28%) - 14.08(14.08%) Work /participation reflects the assignment purpose |
Points Range:14.24 (14.24%) - 15.04(15.04%) Work /participation is accurately detailed |
Points Range:15.2 (15.2%) - 16 (16%) Work /participation stands-out as exemplary and is accurately detailed |
|
Knowledge of Content |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 12.41 (12.41%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is inferior. |
Points Range:12.58 (12.58%) - 13.94(13.94%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is elementary, requires significant assistance |
Points Range:14.11 (14.11%) - 14.96(14.96%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is acceptable, requires average assistance |
Points Range:15.13 (15.13%) - 15.98(15.98%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is accomplished, requires little to no assistance |
Points Range:16.15 (16.15%) - 17 (17%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is highly evolved |
|
Knowledge of Content |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 12.41 (12.41%) Ineffective documentation of research/support |
Points Range:12.58 (12.58%) - 13.94(13.94%) Uses minimum ref(s) to support research with poor integration |
Points Range:14.11 (14.11%) - 14.96(14.96%) Uses adequate ref(s) to support research with acceptable integration |
Points Range:15.13 (15.13%) - 15.98(15.98%) Uses adequate ref(s) and integrates them well |
Points Range:16.15 (16.15%) - 17 (17%) Uses a thorough # of ref(s) and integrates them clearly and concisely |
|
Critical Thinking |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 10.95 (10.95%) Fails to compare/contrast and/or evaluate information |
Points Range:11.1 (11.1%) - 12.3 (12.3%) Comparing/contrasting and/or evaluating information is at an elementary level |
Points Range:12.45 (12.45%) - 13.2(13.2%) Comparing/contrasting and/or evaluating information is accomplished at an acceptable level |
Points Range:13.35 (13.35%) - 14.1(14.1%) Is able to effectively compare/contrast and/or evaluate information |
Points Range:14.25 (14.25%) - 15 (15%) Integration of information is well analyzed, interpreted, and documented to meet research objectives |
|
Critical Thinking |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 10.95 (10.95%) Does not discuss or defines other relationships, systems, or subsystems |
Points Range:11.1 (11.1%) - 12.3 (12.3%) Discuss or defines other relationships, systems, or subsystems |
Points Range:12.45 (12.45%) - 13.2(13.2%) Discuss or defines other systems or subsystems and begins to identify relationships |
Points Range:13.35 (13.35%) - 14.1(14.1%) Defines other systems or subsystems and can accurately identify relationships |
Points Range:14.25 (14.25%) - 15 (15%) Graphically defines other systems or subsystems and can accurately identify relationships |
|
Written |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 4.38 (4.38%) Sentences are not well-constructed and often lack clarity. Formats and patterns are repetitive |
Points Range:4.44 (4.44%) - 4.92 (4.92%) Sentences are somewhat clear and well constructed, but lack variety in format & length |
Points Range:4.98 (4.98%) - 5.28 (5.28%) Most sentences are clear and well-constructed- Some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity. |
Points Range:5.34 (5.34%) - 5.64 (5.64%) Sentences are clear and well-constructed - Some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity |
Points Range:5.7 (5.7%) - 6 (6%) Sentences are clear and well-constructed - Evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity |
|
Written |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 5.11 (5.11%) Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:5.18 (5.18%) - 5.74 (5.74%) Paper contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:5.81 (5.81%) - 6.16 (6.16%) Paper contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:6.23 (6.23%) - 6.58 (6.58%) Paper contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:6.65 (6.65%) - 7 (7%) No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent |
|
Written |
Points Range:0 (0%) - 5.11 (5.11%) Paper is riddled with APA errors |
Points Range:5.18 (5.18%) - 5.74 (5.74%) Paper contains 5 or 6 APA errors |
Points Range:5.81 (5.81%) - 6.16 (6.16%) Paper contains 3 or 4 APA errors |
Points Range:6.23 (6.23%) - 6.58 (6.58%) Paper contains 1 or 2 APA errors |
Points Range:6.65 (6.65%) - 7 (7%) No APA errors are readily apparent |
Name:Reseach Papers
Description:Distributed Learning Research Paper Rubric. This rubric will be used for all three research papers in the course.
Bottom of Form
Exit
Exit