HRM
Altamimimy
example_answers.docxPost by Aaron Faltersack
Discussion 1
I would not let their choice of logo deter me from applying to this job. I understand first impressions are important and have a lasting effect. However, I do not find their logo offensive, I view at as a form of “folk” art. If the job description fits my desires I would apply and hope to ascertain a better judgement of the company through the interview process.
The company value is printed directly on the logo “WWII Work Ethic.” I think they are trying to convey an attitude that many could agree with, that is, pride in one’s craftsmanship and skilled precision in their work. I think they are seeking employees that strive for excellence in their trade. This type of “nose art” or “folk” art was often used by military crews, specifically flight crews. “Two of its benefits were self-pride and psychological fortification” (Griffith, 2005). This art is also said to have helped boost morale of military crews (Griffith, 2005).
I do not think the human resource department can be determined by the company logo. I think the content of the advertisement may better address the HR department. I do not see any statements in the post that would discourage a specific race or gender from applying. However, I do not see a statement saying they are an equal opportunity employer. The absence of that statement may cause some to feel uncomfortable about applying for the position.
References
Griffith, D. J. (2005, November). Military Aircraft Nose Art: An AMerican Tradition. Retrieved from Through Our Parents Eyes: http://parentseyes.arizona.edu/militarynoseart/overview3.htm
Post by Damon Wodke
Re: WK1 DQ1
I would apply to the company even though I think that I would have reservations about the company which will in end result make me ask several questions before even taking the job. A logo anchors a company's brand and becomes the single most visible manifestation of the company within the target market (Gillikin). In that article it reiterates what my process is that the logo is a representation of the company.
I think that it shows that the company values may seem to be a more relaxed value system and or sexist system. The questions I am more concerned with are if my money system is going to be substantial for the duration of time I'm going to be there or is it something that's face front and will dissipate soon after employment.
It also tells me that the HR department is more relaxed or not of the feminist type. It is a depiction of what we perceive and I personally perceive it to be something that isn't very business like. I would feel uncomfortable in any situation as I feel there would be many that would constitute firing in any normal company but might fly or might not fly depending on how the Hr feels that day.
Gillikin, J, importance of logos in business. http://smallbusiness.chron.com/importance-logos-business-577.html
Post by Ryan Seaders
WK1 DQ1
I would apply to work for his organization if my options were limited. The company looks as though it prioritizes efficiency of its people and processes and wants someone to help add to its efforts. I would not feel comfortable working for this organization if my priorities were that women are respected as the image used on their logo feels offensive to me on the behalf of women in general. The image seems to invite a lack of respect for women and seems to target men’s libido. However, this company was found in 1957 which makes the image more of a cool legacy statement. The companies mission statement reads, “We are committed to bringing our customers the highest quality product, using the latest manufacturing technology, at the best price.”. I really like their focus and mission from their website.
Reference:
Pacific Tool and Gauge (2016). About Us. Retrieved September 28, 2016, from http://pacifictoolandgauge.com/content/4-about-us
