Homework Solution

profilesjegh.alnent3
rubric_topic_3.docx

Gaining Trust With Cultural Disparities

 

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00%

3 Satisfactory 75.00%

4 Good 85.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

80.0 %Content

 

40.0 % Description of Elements That Contribute to the Target Population's Distrust of the Health Care System and or Medical Treatments

Description reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lack of ability to apply information.

Description displays a lack of comprehension but indicates an attempt to apply information. Presentation of material does not meet minimal requirements of the assignment as there is not enough information from which to understand key aspects, and it demonstrates no critical thinking aspects.

Description exhibits comprehension/ understanding of key aspects and policies, and attempts to integrate information and present basic thoughts and formulation of similarities and differences in values and practices.

Description demonstrates integrative comprehension, exhibiting thorough and thoughtful processing of information. Evidentiary support is creatively interwoven and presented in a manner that supports the writer's position and perspective.

Description demonstrates integrative comprehension and thoughtful application of concepts and application in real-world situations. Presentation of material and components include expanded and unique outlook.

40.0 % Discussion of How the U.S. Health Care System Has Served the Target Population in Current Times and Historically

Discussion reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lack of ability to apply information.

Discussion displays a lack of comprehension but indicates an attempt to apply information. Presentation of material does not meet minimal requirements of the assignment as there is not enough information provided to facilitate understanding of key aspects. There is not a demonstration of critical thinking.

Discussion exhibits comprehension/ understanding of key aspects and policies, and attempts to integrate information and present basic thoughts and formulation of similarities and differences in values and practices.

Discussion demonstrates integrative comprehension, exhibiting thorough and thoughtful processing of information. Evidentiary support is creatively interwoven and presented in a manner that supports the writer's position and perspective.

Discussion demonstrates integrative comprehension and thoughtful application of concepts and application in real-world situations. Presentation of material and components include expanded and unique outlook.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague, purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

5.0 % Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

 

2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Format

 

3.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 % Total Weightage