attached two assignments

2

How We Listen

. we all listen to music according t� our separate cap ci­� e

. ti s. But, for the sake of analysis, the whole hstemng process may become clearer if we break it up into its compo-

. nent parts, so to speak. In a certain sense w. e all listen to mu­ sic on three separate planes. For lack of a better terminology, one might name these: (1) the sensuous plane, (2) the expres­ sive plane, (3) the sheerly musical plane. The only advantage to be gained from mechanically splitting up the listening pro­ cess into these hypothetical planes is the clearer view to be had of the way in which we listen.

The simplest way of listening to music is to listen for the sheer pleasure of the musical sound itself. That is the sensu­ ous plane. It is the plane on which we hear music without thinking, without considering it in any way. One turns on the radio while doing something else and absentmindedly

How We Listen 9

bathes in the sound. A kind of brainless but attractive state of mind is engendered by the mere sound appeal of the music.

You may be' sitting in a room reading this book. Imagine one note struck on the piano. Immediately that one note is enough to change the atmosphere of the room-proving that the sound element in music is a powerful and mysterious agent, which it would be foolish to deride or belittle.

The surprising thing is that many people who consider themselves qualified music lovers ab.use that plane in listen­ ing. They go to concerts in order to lose themselves. They use music as a consolation or an escape. They enter an ideal world where one doesn't have to think of the realities of everyday life. Of course they aren't thinking about the music either. Music allows them to leave it, and they go off to a place to dream, dreaming because of and apropos of the music yet never quite listening to it.

Yes, the sound appeal of music is a potent and primitive force, but you must not allow it to usurp a disproportionate share of your interest. The sensuous plane is an important one in music, a very important one, but it does not constitute the whole story.

There is no need to digress further on the sensuous plane. Its appeal to every normal human being is self-evident. There is, however, such a thing as becoming more sensitive to the different kinds of sound stuff as used by various composers. For all composers do not use that sound stuff in the same way. Don't get the idea that the value of music is commensu­ rate with its sensuous appeal or that the loveliest-sounding

10 What to Listen for in Music .

music is made by the greatest composer. If that were so, Ravel would be a greater creator than Be�thoven. The point is that the sound element varies with each composer, that his usage of sound forms an integral part of his style and must be taken into account when listening; The reader can see, therefore, that a more conscious approach is valuable even on this pri­ mary plane of music listening.

The second plane on which music exists is what I have called the expressive one. Here, immediately, we tread on controversial ground. Composers have a way of shying away

. from any discussion of music's expressive side. Did not Stravinsky himself proclaim that his music was an" object," a "thing," with a life of its own, and with no other meaning than its own purely musical existence? This intransigent atti­ tude of Stravinsky's may be due to the fact that so many peo­ ple have tried to read different meanings into so many pieces. Heaven knows it is difficult enough to say precisely what it is that a piece of music means, to say it definitely, to say it fi­ nally so that everyone is satisfied with your explanation. But that should not lead one to the other extreme of denying to music the right to be "expressive."

My own belief is that all music has an expres,sive power, some more and some less, but that all music has a certain meaning behind the notes and that the meaning behind the notes constitutes, after all, what the piece is saying, what the piece is about. This whole problem can be stated quite simply by asking, "Is there a meaning to music?'.' My answer to that would be, "Yes." And "Can you state in so many words what

How We Listen 11

the meaning is?" My answer to that would be, "No." Therein . lies the difficulty.

Simple-minded souls will never be satisfied with the answer to the second of these questions. They always want music to. have a meaning, and the more concrete it is the better they like it. The more the music reminds them of a train, a storm, a fu­ neral, or any other familiar conception the more expressiye it appears to be to them. This popular idea of music's meaning-­ stimulated and abetted by the usual run of musical commenta­ tor-should be discouraged wherever and whenever it is met. One timid lady once confessed to me that she suspected some­ thing seriously lacking in her appreciation of music because of her inability to connect it with anything definite. That is get­ ting the whole thing backward, of course.

Still, the question remains, How close should the intelli­ gent music lover wish to come to pinning a definite meaning to any particular work? No closer than a general concept, I should say. Music expresses, at different moments, serenity or exuberance, regret or triumph, fury or delight. It expresses each of these moods, and many others, in a numberless vari­ ety of subtle shadings and differences. It may even express a state of meaning for which there exists no adequate word in any language. In that case, musicians often like to say that it has only a purely musical meaning. They sometimes go far­ ther and say that all music has only a purely musical mean­ ing. What they really mean is that no appropriate word can be found to express the music's meaning and that, even if it co1:1Id, they do not feel the need of finding it.

12 What to �isten for in Music

But whatever the professional musician may hold, most musical novices still search for specific words with which to pin down their musical reactions. That is why they always find Tschaikovsky easier to "understand" than Beethoven. In the first place, it is easier to pin a meaning-word on a Tschai­ kovsky piece than on a Beethoven one. Much easier. More­ over, with the Russian composer, every time you come back to a piece of his 1.t almost always says the same thing to you, whereas with Beethoven it is often quite difficult to put your finger right on what he is saying. And any musician will tell you that that is why Beethoven is the greater composer. Be­ cause music which always says the same thing to you will necessarily soon become dull music, but music whose me�n­ ing is slightly different with each hearing has a greater chance of remaining alive.

Listen, if you can, to the forty-eight fugue themes of Bach's Well Tempered Clavichord. Listen to each theme, one after an� other. You will soon realize that each theme mirrors a differ­ ent world of feeling. You will also soon realize that the more beautiful a theme seems to you the harder it is to find any word that will describe it to your complete satisfaction. Yes, yoU: will certainly know whether it is a gay theme or a sad one. You will be able, in other words, in your own mind, to draw a frame of emotional feeling around your theme. Now study the sad one a little closer. Try to pin down the exact quality of its sadness. Is it pessimistically sad or resignedly sad; is it fatefully sad or smilin ly sad?9

Let us suppose that you are fortunate and can describe to your own satisfaction in so many words the exact meaning of

How We Listen 13

your chosen theme. There is still no guarantee that anyone else will be satisfied. Nor need they be. The important thing is that each one feel for himself the specific expressive quality of a theme or, similarly, an entire piece of music. And if it is a great work of art, don't expect it to mean exactly the same thing to you each time you return to it.

Themes or pieces need not express only o�e emotion, of course. Take such a theme as the first main one of the Ninth Sy'mphony, for example. It is clearly made up of different ele­ ments. It does not say only one thing. Yet anyone hearing it immediately gets a feeling of strength, a feeling of power. It isn't a power that comes simply because the theme is played loudly. It is a power inherent in the theme itself. The extraor­ dinary strength and vigor of the theme results in the listen­ er's receiving an impression that a forceful statement has been made. But one should never try to boil it down to "the fateful hammer of life," etc. That is where the trouble begins. The musician, in his exasperation, says it means nothing but the notes themselves, whereas the nonprofessional is· only too anxious to hang on to any explanation that gives him the illusion of getting closer to the music's meaning.

Now, perhaps, the reader will know better what I mean when I say that music does have an expressive meaning but that we cannot say in so many words what that meaning is.

The third plane on which music exists is the sheerly musi­ cal plane. Besides the pleasurable sound of music and the ex­ pressive feeling that it gives off, music does exist in terms of the notes themselves and of their manipulation. Most listen­ ers are not sufficiently conscious of this third plane. It will be

14 .

What to Listen for in Music

largely the business of this book to make them more aware of music on this plane.

Professional musicians, on the other hand, are, if anything, too conscious of the mere notes themselves. They often fall into the error of becpming so engrossed with their arpeggios and staccatos that they forget the deeper aspects of the music they are performing. But from the layman's standpoint, it is not so much a matter of getting over bad habits on the sheerly musical plane as of increasing one's awareness of what is go­ ing on, in so far as the notes are concerned.

When the man in the stree •

t listens to · the "notes them- I

v e is st i elsel es" with any degree of concentration, h mo l k y to . make some mention of the melody. Either he hears a pretty melody or he does not, and he generally lets it go at that. Rhythm is likely to gain his attention next, particularly if it seems exciting. But harmony and tone color are generally taken for granted, if they are thought of consciously at all. As for music's having a definite form of some kind, that idea seems never to have occurred to him.

It is very imp�rtant for all of us to become more alive to music on its sheerly musical plane. After all, an actual musi­ cal material is being used. The intelligent listener must b

7 prepared to in�rease his awareness of the musical material and what happens to it. He must hear the melodies, the rhythms, the harmonies, the tone colors in a more conscious fashion. But above all he must, in order to follow the line of the composer 's thought, kno� something of the principles of musical form. Listening to all of these elements is listening on the sheerly musical plane.

How We Listen 15

Let . m. e repeat that I have split up mechanically the three separate planes on which we listen merely for the sake of greater clarity. Actually, we never listen on one or the other of. these planes. What we do is to correlate them-listening in

· all three wa'ys at th am. e s e tim�. It takes no mental effort, for we do it instinctively.

Perhaps an analogy with what happens to us when we visit. the theater will make this instirtctive co�relatiort clearer. In the theater, you are aware of the actors and actresses, cos­ tumes and sets, sounds and movements. All these give one the sense that the theater is a pleasant place to be in. They constitute the sensuous plane in our theatrical reactions.

The expressive plane in the theater would be derived from the feeling that you get from what is happening on the stage. You are moved to pity, excitement, or gayety. It is this general feeling, generated aside from the particular words being spo­ ken, a certain emotional something which exists op. the stage, that is analogous to the expressive quality in music.

The plot and plot development is equivalent to our sheerly musical plane. The playwright creates and develops a char­ acter in just the same way that a composer creates and devel­ ops a theme. According to the degree of your awareness of the way in which the artist in either field handles his material will you become a more intelligent listener.

It is easy enough to see that the theatergoer never is con­ scious of any of these eiements separately. He is aware of them all at the same time. The same is true of music listening. We simultaneously and without thinking listen on all three planes.

16 What to Listen for in Music

In a sense, the ideal listener is both inside and outside the

music at the same moment, judging it and enjoying it, wish­

ing it would go one way and Watching it go another-almost

like the composer at the moment he composes it; because in

· order to write his music, the composer must also be inside

and outside his music, carried away by it and yet coldly criti­

cal of it. A subjec�ve and objective attitude is implied in both

creating and listening to music.

What the reader should strive for, then, is a more active

kind of listening. Whether you listen to Mozart or Duke El­

lington, you can deepen your understanding of music only

by being a more conscious and aware listener-not someone

who is just listening, but someone who is listening/or some-

thing.

Bach-Well-Tempered Clavier, Books I and II ( 48 Preludes an� Fu�ues) Wanda Landowska (harpsichord) (RCA); Andras Schiff (piano)

(London) Beethoven-The Nine Symphonies . .

John Eliot Gardiner (Archiv); OttoKlemperer (Angel-EM!)