Need done. Art class
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC
|
CONTENT FACTORS (70%) |
0-0.4 Points |
0.5-0.7 Points |
0.8-1.0 Points |
1.1-1.4 Points |
10 Total Points Possible |
|
Coverage |
Discussion of most key elements is missing or unclear |
Some key elements are covered, with two or more missing |
Most key elements of the assignment are covered well; one or two elements missing or unclear |
Exceptional coverage of all key elements of the assignment |
|
|
Content |
Content does not focus primarily on the assignment elements, is neither supported accurately or delivered persuasively |
Content is missing regarding several key elements of assignment; some inaccuracies; arguments or assertions are not always persuasive |
Opportunities missed to provide comprehensive content; content is accurate and persuasive overall |
Content is comprehensive, accurate and persuasive |
|
|
Understanding of Theory(ies) |
Most examples and language from the theory(ies) are out of context and/or irrelevant to the major point(s); terms are inaccurate and/or irrelevant and not defined |
Some examples or uses of language from theory(ies) are out of context and/or irrelevant to the major point(s); terms are not always used correctly and/or defined for the reader |
Several examples and some appropriate language from relevant theory(ies); terms used often are described accurately |
The writer uses appropriate examples and language from relevant theory(ies) for each major point; terms specific to each theory are described accurately |
|
|
Analysis |
There is little or no analysis of major points; discussion often is irrelevant |
Analysis is missing on more than one major point; relevance of the analysis is not always clear for the reader |
Most major points include a clear analysis demonstrating a good understanding of key points and their relevance to the overall subject of the assignment |
Analysis of major points from the assignment demonstrates a strong understanding of key points and their relevance to the overall subject of the assignment |
|
|
Research |
Little or no research is provided to support content |
Research is mainly from sources that are not peer reviewed or the assigned text(s); links between the discussion and research are often missing or unclear |
Some research is included from assigned text(s) and peer-reviewed sources; a strong link between the discussion and the research is missing |
Research is from assigned text(s) and peer-reviewed sources and clearly relates to the topic being discussed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
|
ORGANIZATION FACTORS (15%) |
0-0.14 Points |
0.15-0.19 Points |
0.2-0.24 Points |
0.25-0.3 Points |
|
|
Tone |
Tone is inappropriate for content and assignment (see Writing Style tutorials in CWE*) |
Language used is often too informal or casual for content and assignment |
Some language used is too informal or casual for content and assignment |
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment |
|
|
Introduction |
Little or no background information is provided; major points are not previewed for the reader |
Background information is provided, but too briefly or too exhaustively for an introduction; relevance of most information provided is unclear |
Relevance is not clear in some background information provided; opportunities are missed to indicate major points for reader |
The introduction provides brief but sufficient background on the topic and previews major points |
|
|
Thesis |
No purpose and thesis statements are included (see Thesis Development tools in the CWE) |
Purpose and thesis of the paper are unclear for the reader |
Clear purpose for the paper is included; thesis statement is vague or overbroad |
The purpose and thesis for the paper are immediately clear |
|
|
Paragraphs |
Transitions between paragraphs are missing; the purpose of the paragraph is unclear or contains unnecessary discussion; paragraphs do not support the paper's thesis (see Writing Wizard in the CWE) |
Transitions between paragraphs are often missing or do not guide the reader easily from one topic to the next; paragraphs often do not support the paper's thesis |
Paragraph transitions are occasionally missing or unclear; there is some jumping from one topic to another within paragraphs; paragraphs do not always support the paper's thesis |
Paragraph transitions are present, logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper as well as support the paper's thesis |
|
|
Conclusion |
No conclusion or conclusion is mostly irrelevant to the purpose and discussion in the paper (see Writing Styles tutorials in CWE) |
Conclusion introduces information not covered in paper; focuses primarily on assertions/opinions rather than findings in the paper |
Conclusion is logical and flows from body of paper; primarily lists rather than summarizes the major points |
The conclusion is logical, flows form the body of the paper, and briefly summarizes the major points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
|
MECHANICS FACTORS (15%) |
0-0.14 Points |
0.15-0.19 Points |
0.2-0.24 Points |
0.25-0.3 Points |
|
|
Formatting |
There is little or no formatting compliant with APA formatting guidelines (see APA sample paper in CWE) |
There are several key formatting errors in the paper |
There are one or two formatting errors in the paper |
The paper - including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page - is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements |
|
|
Intellectual Property |
Citations and references are missing for all or most intellectual property (see Instructor Policies for this course regarding plagiarism and Student Code of Academic Integrity in CWE) |
Some opportunities missed to cite intellectual property; in-text citations were missing but on reference page or reference page was included but not cited in the text |
One or two opportunities missed to cite intellectual property; in-text citations were not always matched with references on reference page |
Intellectual property is recognized at all times with both in-text citations and a reference page |
|
|
Grammar, Etc. |
Repeated errors in spelling, grammar, word usage, and/or punctuation made understanding the major points in the paper difficult to understand (see Grammar and Writing Guides in the CWE) |
Several errors regarding spelling, grammar, word usage, and/or punctuation |
Some errors regarding spelling, grammar, word usage, and/or punctuation |
Rules of spelling, grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed |
|
|
Sentence Variety and Clarity |
Sentences are often run-on or incomplete; several sentences or phrases are difficult to understand as written (see Sentence Variety tutorial in Writing Styles/CWE) |
Sentence structure tends to be limited to one style; sentences or phrases are often unclear for the reader |
Good sentence variety overall; some sentences or phrases are unclear for the reader |
Sentences are complete, clear, concise, and varied |
|
|
Word Count |
Word count requirement is not met |
Word count is 25% or more over or under assignment requirements |
Word count is 15% over or under assignment requirements |
Word count meets assignment requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
|
*Centers for Writing Excellence |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|