Economics
vjayala
week_4_grading_rubric.doc|
Business Cycles, Economic Shocks, and Restoring Equilibrium Grading Guide ECO/561 Version 11 |
4 |
Business Cycles, Economic Shocks, and Restoring Equilibrium Grading Guide
ECO/561 Version 11
Economics
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Learning Team Assignment: Business Cycles, Economic Shocks, and Restoring Equilibrium
Purpose of Assignment
The Week 4 assignment provides the learner the opportunity to relate real world experiences to the economic theories of demand and supply, equilibrium, business cycles, economic shocks, and how markets adjust to new equilibria after encountering major shocks.
Grading Guide
|
Content |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
The team analyzed the economic and sociological forces that drove their assigned market’s equilibrium to unsustainable heights and the shocks that brought the markets back down. The team explained what could be done to moderate the effects of these economic swings. |
|
|
|
|
|
The team discussed specific changes in supply and demand. |
|
|
|
|
|
The team examined prior government policies and legislation that exacerbated the impact of the shocks. |
|
|
|
|
|
The team evaluated the actions of the federal government and the Federal Reserve to restore equilibrium. The team discussed the effectiveness of the counter cyclical policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
The team evaluated the tools used by the Federal Reserve and their effect on the economy. |
|
|
|
|
|
The team cited a minimum of three peer reviewed sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
The assignment is 1,400 words in length. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
5 |
#5 |
|
|
Writing Guidelines |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
The paper includes properly cited intellectual property using APA style in-text citations and a reference page. |
|
|
|
|
|
The paper includes paragraph and sentence transitions that are logical and maintain flow throughout the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
The paper includes sentences that are complete, clear, and concise. |
|
|
|
|
|
The paper follows proper rules of grammar and usage including spelling and punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
3 |
#/3 |
|
|
Assignment Total |
# |
8 |
#/8 |
|
|
Additional comments:
|
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
