|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria
|
Outstanding
|
Superior
|
Good
|
Substandard
|
Failure
|
|
Content: Explains the Executive Leader's Role in Creating an Organizational Structure, the Purpose of a Structure and Why the Leader is the Best Person to Determine the Structure
|
1.4 points
Demonstrates an exceptional, thorough and insightful understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in explaining the executive leader's role in creating an organizational structure, the purpose of a structure and why the leader is the best person to determine the structure.
(1.26 - 1.4)
|
1.19 points
Demonstrates excellent understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in explaining the executive leader's role in creating an organizational structure, the purpose of a structure and why the leader is the best person to determine the structure.
(1.12 - 1.259)
|
1.05 points
Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in explaining the executive leader's role in creating an organizational structure, the purpose of a structure and why the leader is the best person to determine the structure.
(0.98 - 1.119)
|
0.91 points
Demonstrates limited understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in explaining the executive leader's role in creating an organizational structure, the purpose of a structure and why the leader is the best person to determine the structure.
(0.84 - 0.979)
|
0 points
Failed to demonstrate understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in explaining the executive leader's role in creating an organizational structure, the purpose of a structure and why the leader is the best person to determine the structure.
(0)
|
|
Content: Identify Organizational Structure
|
1.4 points
Identifies all 8 organizational structures and provides an exceptional, thorough and insightful discussion of the associated decision making flow and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the structure.
(1.26 - 1.4)
|
1.19 points
Identifies 6 - 7 organizational structures and provides a thorough and insightful discussion of the associated decision making flow and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the structure.
(1.12 - 1.259)
|
1.05 points
Identifies 4-5 organizational structures and provides a thorough and insightful understanding of the associated decision making flow and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the structure.
(0.98 - 1.119)
|
0.91 points
Identifies 1-3 organizational structures and provides a thorough and insightful discussion of the associated decision making flow and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the structure; identified 4-8 organizational structures without providing a discussion about the decision making flow and advantages/disadvantages associated with the structure.
(0.84 - 0.979)
|
0 points
Fails to identify organizations, decision making flow and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the structure.
(0)
|
|
Content: Organizational Structure of Blended Company
|
1.2 points
Demonstrates an exceptional ability to provide a thorough and insightful understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in selecting the structure that best blends the two companies (GDD and Mail on Wheels) and explain why the type of structure best fits the purpose of the merger including the decision making flow, the alignment of people to the selected structure and how the two companies would interface to create a competitive advantage.
(1.08 - 1.20)
|
1.02 points
Demonstrates an excellent ability to provide a thorough and insightful understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in selecting the structure that best blends the two companies (GDD and Mail on Wheels) and explain why the type of structure best fits the purpose of the merger including the decision making flow, the alignment of people to the selected structure and how the two companies would interface to create a competitive advantage.
(0.96 - 1.079)
|
0.9 points
Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to provide a thorough and insightful understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in selecting the structure that best blends the two companies (GDD and Mail on Wheels); satisfactorily explains why the type of structure best fits the purpose of the merger including the decision making flow, the alignment of people to the selected structure and how the two companies would interface to create a competitive advantage.
(0.84 - 0.959)
|
0.78 points
Demonstrates a limited ability to provide a thorough and insightful understanding of the key concepts, principles and theories in selecting the structure that best blends the two companies (GDD and Mail on Wheels). There is missing information in explaining why the type of structure best fits the purpose of the merger including the decision making flow, the alignment of people to the selected structure and how the two companies would interface to create a competitive advantage.
(0.72 - 0.839)
|
0 points
Fails to select the structure that best blends the two companies (GDD and Mail on Wheels), explain why the type of structure best fits the purpose of the merger including the decision making flow, the alignment of people to the selected structure and how the two companies would interface to create a competitive advantage
(0)
|
|
Content: FedEx and Kinko Research
|
1.4 points
Demonstrates an exceptional ability to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(1.26 - 1.40)
|
1.6065 points
1.19Demonstrates an excellent ability to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(1.12 - 1.259)
|
1.05 points
Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to discuss the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(0.98 - 1.119)
|
0.91 points
Demonstrates a limited ability to discuss the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures; missing key elements/issues.
(0.84 - 0.979)
|
0 points
Fails to identify the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(0)
|
|
Content: Paralleled Merger Issues
|
1.4 points
Demonstrates an exceptional ability to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(1.26 - 1.4)
|
1.19 points
Demonstrates an excellent ability to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(1.12 - 1.259)
|
1.05 points
Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to discuss the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(0.98 - 1.119)
|
0.9 points
Demonstrates a limited ability to discuss the key concepts, principles and theories in researching and identifying the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures; missing key elements/issues.
(0.84 - 0.979)
|
0 points
Fails to identify the organizational cultures of the two companies and the problems that resulted from the attempt to blend the two cultures.
(0)
|
|
Content: How Rockfish Can Avoid Same Issues
|
1.2 points
Demonstrates an exceptional ability to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in discussing how Rockfish can avoid the same mistakes as FedEx.
(1.08 - 1.20)
|
1.02 points
Demonstrates an excellent ability to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in discussing how Rockfish can avoid the same mistakes as FedEx.
(0.96 - 1.079)
|
0.9 points
Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in discussing how Rockfish can avoid the same mistakes as FedEx.
(0.84 - 0.959)
|
0.78 points
Demonstrates a limited to provide a thorough and insightful discussion of the key concepts, principles and theories in discussing how Rockfish can avoid the same mistakes as FedEx. Key points are missing.
(0.72 - 0.839)
|
0 points
Fails to discuss how Rockfish can avoid the same mistakes as FedEx.
(0)
|
|
Critical Thinking/Reasoning
|
4 points
Comments reflect a highly accomplished level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts resulting in accurate, thorough, and soundly reasoned conclusions.
(3.6 - 4.0)
|
3.4 points
Comments reflect an excellent level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts resulting in accurately reasoned conclusions.
(3.2 – 3.59 )
|
3 points
Comments reflect a satisfactory level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts resulting in partially correct conclusions that lack development or detail that demonstrates insight into reasoning.
(2.8 - 3.19)
|
2.6 points
Comments reflect an unsatisfactory level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts, resulting in conclusions that are underdeveloped or lack soundly reasoned conclusions.
(2.4 - 2.79)
|
0 points
Comments reflect an unsatisfactory level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts, resulting in failure to draw little to no conclusions.
(0 – 2.39)
|
|
Application of Resources
|
3 points
Presents exceptionally well-supported arguments or positions with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts.
(2.7 - 3.0)
|
2.55 points
Presents excellent arguments or positions that are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate understanding of the material and concepts.
(2.4 - 2.69 )
|
2.25 points
Satisfactory arguments or positions are presented but there is a mix of opinion or unclear view with supported arguments using course readings. Case study facts are occasionally used but arguments would be much stronger with use of facts.
(2.1 - 2.39)
|
1.95 points
Arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; Limited use of facts in case study and essential information presented in course readings.
(1.8 - 2.09)
|
0 points
Arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas. Does not provide facts presented in case study.
(0 – 1.79)
|
|
Attention to Instructions
|
2 points
Demonstrates exceptional understanding of requirements responding completely to each aspect of assignment including minor aspects of the assignment such as using third person writing, required use of course readings, and assignment format.
(1.8 - 2.0)
|
1.7 points
Demonstrates excellent understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment.
(1.6 - 1.79)
|
1.5 points
Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment.
(1.4 - 1.59)
|
1.3 points
Fails to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment.
(1.2 - 1.39)
|
0 points
Fails to demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements.
(0 – 1.19)
|
|
Writing Mechanics
|
2 points
Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No errors found. No contractions or jargon used.
(1.8 – 2.0)
|
1.7 points
Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. One to three errors found.
(1.6 – 1.79)
|
1.5 points
Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Four to 10 errors found.
(1.4 – 1.59)
|
1.3 points
Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found.
(1.2 – 1.39)
|
0 points
Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count.
(0 – 1.19)
|
|
APA Style (6th ed.)
|
1 point
No APA style or usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.
(0.9 - 1.0)
|
0.85 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference list but one or two APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.
(0.8 – 0.89)
|
0.75 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted throughout document; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 times in document.
(0.7 – 0.79)
|
0.65 points
Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to use APA citation when appropriate 4-5 times; or presents only 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper that requires APA citations throughout the document.
(0.6 – 0.69)
|
0 points
No attempt at APA style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.
(0 - 0.59)
|
|
Overall Score
|
Outstanding
18 or more
|
Superior
16 or more
|
Good
14 or more
|
Substandard
12 or more
|
Failure
0 or more
|
i.mtti
grading_rubric.docx
0
