PROF XAVIER
HIUS 221
American Art Project – Assignment Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||||
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Below Average |
Unacceptable |
Points Earned |
|
Part 1 – Content and Analysis |
36 to 40 points Four images are selected. Questions are answered in a paragraph that clearly synthesizes information from the website and course materials. Paragraphs explain connections between image and historical context with clear analysis. All information is historically accurate. |
32 to 35 points Four images are selected. Questions are answered in a paragraph that attempts to synthesize information from the website and course materials. Paragraphs explain some connections between image and historical context, but there are some omissions or lack of clarity in the analysis. Information is historically accurate with only 1 minor issue. |
28 to 31 points Four images are selected. Questions are answered but not with any clear synthesis of information. Paragraphs only describe the context but do not present any analysis. Information is basically accurate with only minor errors that do not detract from understanding of the context. |
24 to 27 points Only 3 images are selected. Paragraphs address the questions with no attempt at synthesis of information. Paragraphs only mention the historical context with no description or analysis. There are 1 or more significant errors in accuracy that significantly change understanding of the context. |
0 to 23 points Less than 3 images are selected. Paragraphs do not address the questions in any clear way, nor is there any reference to the course materials. Paragraphs do not mention the historical context. There are significant historical errors. |
|
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||||
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Below Average |
Unacceptable |
Points Earned |
|
Part 1 – Length and Format |
18 to 20 points Presentation contains image, title, and name of artist preceding each paragraph. Paragraphs contain 200–300 words. Citations are written in current Turabian format as provided in the style document. |
16 to 17 points Presentation contains image, title, and name of artist preceding each paragraph. Paragraphs contain 190–310 words. Citations are written in current Turabian format as provided in the style document, with only 1–2 minor errors. |
14 to 15 points Presentation contains image, title, and name of artist preceding each paragraph. Paragraphs contain 170–330 words. There is an attempt to provide citations in current Turabian format as provided in the style document. |
12 to 13 points Presentation contains image, title, and name of artist preceding paragraphs. Paragraphs contain 150–350 words. There is an attempt to provide citations in current Turabian format as provided in the style document, but there are significant errors. |
0 to 11 points Presentation contains image, title, and name of artist preceding less than 4 paragraphs. Paragraphs contain less than 150 words or more than 350 words. There is no attempt to include citations in current Turabian format. |
|
|
Part 2 – Content and Analysis |
19 to 20 points Both paragraphs include summary of historical significance and evaluation of the individuals based on historical fact, with suggestions for replacement as appropriate. |
17 to 18 points Both paragraphs include summary of historical significance and some evaluation of the individuals based primarily on historical fact mixed with personal opinion, with suggestions for replacement as appropriate. |
14 to 16 points Both paragraphs include some summary of historical significance and an attempt at evaluation of the individuals based primarily on personal opinion rather than historical fact, with suggestions for replacement that more accurately represent another state. |
11 to 13 points At least 1 paragraph makes some attempt at presenting the historical significance and some attempt at evaluation that relies on personal opinion. Suggestions for replacement are vague or inappropriate. |
0 to 10 points Neither paragraph presents historical significance beyond a cursory mention, nor is there any attempt at evaluation. |
|
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||||
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Below Average |
Unacceptable |
Points Earned |
|
Part 2 – Length and Format |
10 to 10 points Presentation contains image, name, and state preceding each paragraph. Paragraphs contain 200–250 words. Citations are written in current Turabian format as provided in the style document. |
8 to 9 points Presentation contains image, name, and state preceding each paragraph. Paragraphs contain 190–260 words. Citations are written in current Turabian format as provided in the style document, with only 1–2 minor errors. |
6 to 7 points Presentation contains image, name, and state preceding each paragraph. Paragraphs contain 175–275 words. There is an attempt to provide citations in current Turabian format as provided in the style document. |
4 to 5 points Presentation contains image, name, and state preceding each paragraph. Paragraphs contain 150–300 words. There is an attempt to provide citations in current Turabian format as provided in the style document, but there are significant errors. |
0 to 3 points Presentation contains image, title, and name of artist preceding only 1 paragraph. Paragraphs contain less than 150 words or more than 300 words. There is no attempt to include citations in current Turabian format. |
|
|
Overall – Grammar, Mechanics, and Style |
5 to 5 points Paragraphs are well-constructed and original. They are proofread to prevent grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. There are no mistakes from the Writing Tips document. |
4 to 4 points Paragraphs are well-constructed and original. There are 2–3 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. There are no mistakes from the Writing Tips document. |
3 to 3 points Paragraphs have some degree of proper construction and are original. There are 4–5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. There is 1 mistake from the Writing Tips document. |
2 to 2 points Paragraphs need some improvement in construction but are original. There are 6–7 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. There are 2 mistakes from the Writing Tips document. |
0 to 1 points Paragraphs are poorly constructed with more than 8 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. There are 3 or more mistakes from the Writing Tips document. |
|
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||||
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Below Average |
Unacceptable |
Points Earned |
|
Appearance |
5 to 5 points Submission is creative, visually attractive, and easily readable. |
4 to 4 points Submission is acceptable, with some minor issues with clarity and readability. Some attempt at creativity. |
3 to 3 points Submission lacks creativity but is clear and readable. |
2 to 2 points Submission lacks creativity, contains issues with clarity, or is difficult to read. |
0 to 1 points Submission is poorly crafted, with little or no attempt at clarity or readability. |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
Instructor’s Comments: |
Page 1 of 4