M4 Ethical Issues
africaobie1
psy_636_milestone_four_rubric.doc
PSY 636 Milestone Four Guidelines and Rubric: Ethical Issues
Prompt : Evaluate potential ethical issues that should be considered or guarded against when developing your intervention plan. Include rationale describing how the ethical issues have been addressed appropriately within your plan. How will you address and prepare for these ethical issues in a professional way?
Format : The assignment should follow these formatting guidelines: 2–3 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and citations in APA format.
Instructor feedback : Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
|
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
|
Ethical Issues |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and is substantiated by scholarly research (36-40) |
Describes potential ethical issues that should be considered or guarded against (32-35) |
Potential ethical issues that should be considered or guarded against are lacking detail (28-31) |
Potential ethical issues that should be considered or guarded against are not evident (0-27) |
40 |
|
Rationale |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides insightful rationale substantiated by scholarly research (36-40) |
Includes rationale explaining how the ethical issues have been addressed appropriately (32-35) |
Includes rationale explaining how the ethical issues have been addressed in minimal detail (28-31) |
Rationale explaining how the ethical issues have been addressed is not evident (0-27) |
40 |
|
Organization |
Applies highly effective pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main ideas of the paper (9-10) |
Applies clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main ideas of the paper (8) |
Does not sufficiently apply clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main ideas of the paper (7) |
Organization of ideas is not evident (0-6) |
10 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (9-10) |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (8) |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (7) |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0-6) |
10 |
|
Earned Total Comments |
100% |
