english assignment

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00%

3 Satisfactory 75.00%

4 Good 85.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

15.0 %Template: Audience

Not addressed.

Audience identified is inappropriate and/or explanation provided is inadequate.

Audience identified is appropriate and explanation provided is adequate.

Audience identified is appropriate and explanation provided soundly references support to the premises made.

Audience identified is appropriate and explanation provided thoughtfully references support to the premises made.

15.0 %Template: Standards or Core Propositions

Not addressed.

Standards or core propositions identified are inaccurate.

Standards or core propositions identified are accurate.

Standards or core propositions identified are accurate and include a basic, appropriate outline.

Standards or core propositions identified are accurate and include a professional, appropriate outline.

15.0 %Template: Rationale for Standards or Core Propositions

Not addressed.

Rationale for standards or core propositions is vague and/or do not answer why the standards or core propositions were created.

Rationale for standards or core propositions is clear, answering why the standards or core propositions were created.

Rationale for standards or core propositions is extensive and soundly answers why the standards or core propositions were created.

Rationale for standards or core propositions is thorough and excellently answers why the standards or core propositions were created.

15.0 %Reflection: Similarities and Differences

Not addressed.

Similarities and differences noticed among standards or core propositions are inadequately reflected upon.

Similarities and differences noticed among standards or core propositions are adequately reflected upon.

Reflection includes an extensive explanation of similarities and differences noticed among standards or core propositions.

Comprehensive reflection explaining similarities and differences noticed among standards or core propositions is provided.

15.0 %Reflection: Future Professional Practice

Not addressed.

Areas of confidence and challenges regarding implementation of standards or core propositions are poorly reflected upon.

Areas of confidence and challenges regarding implementation of standards or core propositions are clearly reflected upon.

Areas of confidence and challenges regarding implementation of standards or core propositions are soundly reflected upon.

Areas of confidence and challenges regarding implementation of standards or core propositions are insightfully reflected upon.

15.0 %Reflection: National Board Certified Teacher

Not addressed.

Reflection inadequately explains the requirements to become a National Board Certified Teacher and lacks a clear interest or lack thereof in the process.

Reflection adequately explains the requirements to become a National Board Certified Teacher as well as any interest or lack thereof in the process.

Reflection extensively explains the requirements to become a National Board Certified Teacher as well as any interest or lack thereof in the process.

Reflection proficiently explains the requirements to become a National Board Certified Teacher as well as any interest or lack thereof in the process.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Not addressed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

Not addressed.

References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used.

References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.

100 %Total Weightage