Assignment 2: LASA—Organizational Global Leadership Development Plan Report

Assignment Component

Unsatisfactory

< 76%

Emerging

77%–86%

Proficient

87%–96%

Exemplary

97%–100%

Score

Content Knowledge: Understanding

Communicates understanding of how to assess the global context in which the organization works. Includes global factors that affect the company’s success, and analysis of various important stakeholders and their impact on leadership development needs.

Course Objectives (COs): 1, 6

Program Outcomes (POs): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.2

Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILOs): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.

Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.

Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.

Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.

Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.

Response provides few details and examples.

Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.

Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.

Response provides necessary details and specific examples.

Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of the central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.

Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.

Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider numerous perspectives.

Unsatisfactory: <14

Emerging: 15–16

Proficient: 17–18

Exemplary: 19–20

______ / 20 pts

Comments

Content Knowledge: Application Component 1

Communicates the ability to assess the internal factors in the organization that may enhance or constrain their capacity to be successful in a global context. How to determine global leadership readiness is also included.

CO: 2, 3, 6

PO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.2

ILO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.

Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.

Response is supported by current literature, however, in an inconsistent manner.

Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real-world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.

Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and provides insightful recommendations related to real-world contexts.

Response is supported by current and relevant literature based on sound theories and best practices leading to effective conclusions.

Unsatisfactory: <45

Emerging: 46–51

Proficient: 52–57

Exemplary: 58–60

______ / 60 pts

Comments

Content Knowledge: Application Component 2

Communicates the ability to evaluate the existing structure and leadership style that is conducive to global leadership success. GLD models and best practices are utilized in support of the argument. Explanations of the aspects of the company that align with the models and identification of growth opportunities are included.

CO: 2, 5, 6

PO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.2

ILO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.

Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.

Response is supported by current literature, however, in an inconsistent manner.

Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real- world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.

Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and provides insightful recommendations related to real-world contexts.

Response is supported by current and relevant literature based on sound theories and best practices leading to effective conclusions.

Unsatisfactory: <45

Emerging: 46–51

Proficient: 52–57

Exemplary: 58–60

______ / 60 pts

Comments

Content Knowledge: Application Component 3

Communicates the ability to recommend strategies for developing GL competencies based on research and best practices with demonstrated success.

CO: 5, 6

PO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.2

ILO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.

Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.

Response is supported by current literature, however, in an inconsistent manner.

Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real-world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.

Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and provides insightful recommendations related to real-world contexts.

Response is supported by current and relevant literature based on sound theories and best practices leading to effective conclusions.

Unsatisfactory: <45

Emerging: 46–51

Proficient: 52–57

Exemplary: 58–60

______ / 60 pts

Comments

Content Knowledge: Application Component 4

Communicates the ability to analyze the importance of ethics in GLD. Explanation includes how one’s suggestions account for the development of ethical behavior in a global context. Includes the process of inclusivity and implementation from an internal and external perspective.

CO: 4, 6

PO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.2

ILO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.

Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.

Response is supported by current literature, however, in an inconsistent manner.

Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real-world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.

Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and provides insightful recommendations related to real-world contexts.

Response is supported by current and relevant literature based on sound theories and best practices leading to effective conclusions.

Unsatisfactory: <30

Emerging: 31–34

Proficient: 35–38

Exemplary: 39–40

______ / 40 pts

Comments

Written Communication/Personal Effectiveness

Writing conveys an understanding and application of the essential assignment components.

PO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.2

ILO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Writing is disorganized and lacks appropriate APA style and format.

Writing is unclear and includes major grammatical and usage errors.

Writing shows some gaps with respect to organization and rhetoric, and has some errors with respect to APA style and format.

Writing is somewhat clear and includes some major grammatical or usage errors.

Writing is concise and clear in content, language use, grammar, organization, and sentence structure.

Writing is free of major grammatical and usage errors.

Writing is professional and scholarly, reflecting mastery of content, language use, grammar, organization, and sentence structure.

Writing is cohesive, convincing, and well-composed.

Unsatisfactory: <45

Emerging: 46–51

Proficient: 52–57

Exemplary: 58–60

______ / 60 pts

Comments

Total:

/ 300 pts