300 words needed by 9 pm est
Turn 1
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 1 | ||||||||||
| Question: | What is the main difference between “make-to-order” and “make-to-stock” systems? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | make to stock means you receive the product made and you simply sell. Make to order means you actually assmeble or process materials to be shipped. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | $9,813.01 | $11,913.01 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 2
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 2 | ||||||||||
| Question: | Why would the quality of incoming raw materials be as important as the cost of those materials? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | because it can affect quality of the end result. Sometimes low quality is ok and is cheaper, sometimes it is not. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | $7,660.58 | $10,010.58 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 3
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 3 | ||||||||||
| Question: | What are possible reasons that a firm may choose to carry raw materials in inventory before they are actually required for production? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | in case orders come in with tight timeframe | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | $5,434.00 | $7,784.00 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 4
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 4 | ||||||||||
| Question: | Why is inventory seen as a form of “waste” in lean systems? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | it costs money to house it, and if it could have done in future for cheaper price (lead time discounts for materials). | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | $3,066.82 | $5,416.82 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 5
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 5 | ||||||||||
| Question: | In a “just-in-time” system, why is it important to have reliable suppliers? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | Because as the book notes, not having a material can bring your process to a halt. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | $2,053.81 | $4,403.81 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 6
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 6 | ||||||||||
| Question: | Why do suppliers offer quantity discounts? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | to entice customers to buy more than they need and get inventory out of their hands. Costs money to house inventory. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | -$5,646.01 | -$2,296.01 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 7
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 7 | ||||||||||
| Question: | Why is inspection of raw materials often an inefficient means of improving the quality of the stock? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | because you lose quantity. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | -$7,634.83 | -$4,284.83 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 8
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 8 | ||||||||||
| Question: | What are the potential costs of carrying inventory? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | space, workers to process, and not making interest in the money spent to buy and process materials. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | $0.00 | -$9,664.32 | -$6,314.32 | 100 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 9
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 9 | ||||||||||
| Question: | Why do suppliers offer discounts for orders with longer lead times? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | because the supplier might use JIT manufactuering as well and lead times let them order materials at cheaper cost and can pass savings down to you. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 3 | 67% | 100% | $14,000.00 | $54.70 | $4,154.70 | 205 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 10
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 10 | ||||||||||
| Question: | In a make-to-order system, which inventory stage (raw materials, work-in-process, or finished goods) is likely to have the highest inventory levels? Which stage is likely to have the lowest? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | finished goods has the lowest and raw materials likely the highest. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 4 | 50% | 100% | $15,600.00 | -$151.42 | $3,948.58 | 230 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 11
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 11 | ||||||||||
| Question: | In a make-to-stock system, which inventory stage (raw materials, work-in-process, or finished goods) is likely to have the highest inventory levels? Which stage is likely to have the lowest? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | raw materials lowest, and finsihed goods highest. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 4 | 50% | 100% | $15,600.00 | -$1,683.04 | $2,416.96 | 230 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 12
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 12 | ||||||||||
| Question: | Why is the reduction of setup times so important in lean manufacturing systems? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | less wasted time in handling multiple orders. | ||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 5 | 60% | 80% | $36,600.00 | $17,557.59 | $21,657.59 | 261.2721417318 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 13
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 13 | ||||||||||
| Question: | Why is it often beneficial to develop a long-term relationship with suppliers? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | |||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 5 | 60% | 80% | $36,600.00 | $17,322.33 | $21,422.33 | 261.2721417318 | No |
&P
&F
Turn 14
| Name: | Module 2 for Week 3 | Lecturer: | OPS571 July | ||||||||
| Description: | |||||||||||
| Turn: | 14 | ||||||||||
| Question: | In many just-in-time systems, suppliers open a facility close to their key customers. Why would this be advantageous? | ||||||||||
| Answer: | |||||||||||
| Player | Bids Submitted | Bids Won | Contracts Complete | % Completed on Time | % Satisfied on Quality | Total Contract Value | Account Balance | Net Worth | Reputation Score | Goal Achieved | Answer |
| ANDREW STRONG | 0 | 0 | 6 | 50% | 83% | $44,850.00 | $24,871.60 | $28,971.60 | 276.2721417318 | Yes |
&P
&F