URGENT DUE IN 10 Hours

profileRicardo2222
team_2_hyatt_regency_hotel_.ppsx

Technical Miscommunication: Hyatt Regency Hotel

Team 2:

John Swarts

Laura McGimpsey

Elizabeth Anderson

[http://realitypod.com/]

Outline

Background

Investigation

Graphic Representation

Structural Cause of Failure

Failure in Communication

Clarity

Ethics

Video Case Study Providing Key Insights

[http://www.tallbridgeguy.com/]

Background

When? July 17th, 1981

Where? Hyatt Regency Hotel in Kansas City, Missouri

What? Collapse of the 2nd and 4th floor walkways in the mall’s atrium during a party hosted in the lobby

United States' most devastating structural failure to date: The walkways’ collapse resulted in 114 deaths and over 200 injuries.

[http://skywalk.kansascity.com/]

Investigation

“It wasn’t a matter of doing something wrong, they just never did it at all. Nobody ever did any calculations to figure out whether or not the particular connection that held the skywalks up would work. It got built without anybody ever figuring it out if it would be strong enough. It just slipped through the cracks.”

-Patrick Larney, attorney representing the State Licensing Board

https://books.google.com/books?id=ei8MBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA144&lpg=PA144&dq=It+wasn%27t+a+matter+of+doing+something+wrong,+they+just+never+did+it+at+all.+Nobody+ever+did+any+calculations%E2%80%A6.+It+got+built+without+anybody+figuring+out+if+it+would+be+strong+enough.&source=bl&ots=8xbhipJl-G&sig=XC7hbr4YGp_ITrJAVs6fA_e2oVw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwii1e3q87rOAhUDcRQKHaZzADoQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=It%20wasn't%20a%20matter%20of%20doing%20something%20wrong%2C%20they%20just%20never%20did%20it%20at%20all.%20Nobody%20ever%20did%20any%20calculations%E2%80%A6.%20It%20got%20built%20without%20anybody%20figuring%20out%20if%20it%20would%20be%20strong%20enough.&f=false

[commandsafety.com]

Graphic Representation - Before and After

Structural Cause of Failure

The design of the hanger rod connections was changed in a series of events and disputedcommunications between the fabricator (Havens Steel Company) and the engineering design team (G.C.E. International, Inc., a professional engineering firm). The fabricator changed the design from a one-rod to a two-rod system to simplify the assembly task, doubling the load on the connector, which ultimately resulted in the walkways collapse.

How it was built

How it should have been built

Structural Cause of Failure

Original design, set by engineering firm called for a single rod to connect the walkways to the ceiling

Puts strain on the rod (stronger option)

Steel manufacturer was unsure if a rod at the requested length was possible, so he suggested the two rod system

Engineers okay-ed the two rod design without running any tests. They thought it was the construction company’s design to clear the specifications

Puts strain on cross-beam section (only ⅓ of necessary strength)

Structural Cause of Failure

This stress on the cross-beam section was too much and the rod slipped through and both the 2nd and 4th floor walkways fell.

Failure in Communication

Clarity

Lack of communication about updates on revised designs

Uncertainty of individual roles in the team

Ethics

Accredited engineers failed to take responsibility for proper calculations

Neglected to follow professional code of ethics

Failure in Communication

When the steel fabricator received the plans from the engineers, he assumed that they had been “designed,” when in fact they were not.

To be designed means that the plans have been proven on paper to do the job that they’re intended to do. In this case, it was to support the forces and weight of the walkways itself and potential loads.

What that means is that no one actually ever did the math to check if it could hold the weight. No one checked the fabrication’s edited drawings

The engineers assumed the steel manufacturers would check the two-rod system

The steel manufacturer assumed the engineers would check the two-rod system

American Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics

Canon 3: “Engineers shall issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner”

The engineers on the project failed to provide truthful accounts for their actions and, in so doing, failed to comply with professional code of ethics

“It was basically a lack of communication - it was the expectation of the professional engineer that all he had to do was come up with the basic design concept…”

Paul Spinden, Assistant Attorney General related to the case

ASCE Case Study Providing Key Insights

“Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse: Ethics Case Study No. 4” Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98l3Us8IU-I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98l3Us8IU-I