There was some good information in the response but there was more depth needed on some sections as noted in the rubric. There were also grammar and APA ref errors
There is some good information in the response but more depth and clarity was needed for exemplary as noted in the rubric. The communication section needed a lot more work. There were also grammar and APA ref errors.
THIS IS THE RUBIC THE PROFESSOR GOES BY.PLZ FOLLOW IT
1. Classify five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and justify the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care. Weight: 25%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 34.98 (17.49%)
Did not submit or incompletely classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and did not submit or incompletely justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care.
Fair 70-79% C 35 (17.5%) - 39.98 (19.99%)
Partially classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and partially justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care.
Proficient 80-89% B 40 (20%) - 44.98 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and satisfactorily justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care.
Exemplary 90-100% A 45 (22.5%) - 50 (25%)
Thoroughly classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and thoroughly justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care.
HSA501-A2-2
2. Specify four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Articulate the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital. Weight: 25%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 34.98 (17.49%)
Did not submit or incompletely specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Did not submit or incompletely articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital.
Fair 70-79% C 35 (17.5%) - 39.98 (19.99%)
Partially specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Partially articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital.
Proficient 80-89% B 40 (20%) - 44.98 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Satisfactorily articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital.
Exemplary 90-100% A 45 (22.5%) - 50 (25%)
Thoroughly specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Thoroughly articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital.
HSA501-A2-3
3. Suggest the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Justify your response. Weight: 25%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 34.98 (17.49%)
Did not submit or incompletely suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.
Fair 70-79% C 35 (17.5%) - 39.98 (19.99%)
Partially suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Partially justified your response.
Proficient 80-89% B 40 (20%) - 44.98 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Satisfactorily justified your response.
Exemplary 90-100% A 45 (22.5%) - 50 (25%)
Thoroughly suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Thoroughly justified your response.
HSA501-A2-4
4. 4 recent (i.e., last five [5] years) references Weight: 5%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%)
No references provided
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%)
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
HSA501-A2-5
5. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting Weight: 5%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%)
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%)
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%)
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
HSA501-A2-6
6. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section Weight: 5%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%)
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%)
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%)
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
HSA501-A2-7
7. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources Weight: 5%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%)
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%)
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%)
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
HSA501-A2-8
8. Clarity and Coherence of Writing Weight: 5%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%)
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%)
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%)
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas
marlenepetreaus931
rubic.docx
0
