finance research project on impacts of financial innovations on the performance of sole proprietorships
IMPACT OF FINANCIAL INNOVATIONS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SOLE PROPRIETORSHIPS AT GAKOROMONE MARKET
ANNET WANJIRU GATHIGIA
BC555-0414/2011
A RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE REQUIREMENT OF AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF COMMERCE (FINANCE) AT MERU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
I declare that this research project is my original work and has not been presented in any other University for award of any degree.
Annet Wanjiru Gathigia
BC555-0414/2011
Signature ……………………………….
Date …………………………………….
This research project has been submitted for examination with my approval as the University supervisor.
Dr. Charles Njati Ibuanthu
Signature ………………………………….
Date ……………………………………......
I dedicate this research project to my parents for their support and persistence and for being a source of inspiration in the course of my studies. I also wish to dedicate it to my siblings, Eric and Dennis for their motivation and encouragement throughout my course.
I wish to acknowledge the efforts of my family members for their financial support and encouragement throughout the research period.
I am deeply obliged to my supervisor Dr. Njati Ibuanthu for his exemplary support, constructive criticism and skillful guidance, without which this project would not have been a success.
Above all, I would like to acknowledge the Almighty God for all the blessings He showered on me and for guiding me throughout the study.
TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION……………………………………………………………………… ii DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………………. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTER ONE 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY 1 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the Study 1 1.2 Statement of the Problem 2 1.3 Purpose of the Study 3 1.4 Study Objectives 3 1.5 Study Question 3 1.6 Scope of the Study 4 1.7 Limitation and Delimitation 4 1.8 Significance of the Study 4 1.9 Definition of Operational Terms 5 CHAPTER TWO 6 REVIEW OF RELATATED LITERATURE 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Product Innovations on Business Performance 6 2.3 Technological Innovation and Business Performance 6 2.4 The Impact of Innovation Technology on Small Business Performance 7 2.5 Theoretical Framework 7 2.6 Conceptual Framework 8 CHAPTER THREE 10 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 10 3.0 Introduction 10 3.1 Study Design 10 3.2 Study Site 10 3.3 Study Population 10 3.4 Sampling Techniques and sample Size 11 3.5 Research instruments 12 3.5.1Questionnaire for sole proprietors of small businesses in Gakoromone market 12 3.6 Piloting 13 3.7 Instrument Validity 13 3.8 Data collection procedures 13 3.9 Data Analysis Techniques 13 3.10 Logistical and Ethical issues 13 CHAPTER FOUR 14 DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION 14 4.1 Introduction 14 4.2 Rate of Questionnaire Return 14 4.3 Effects of Technology in Business 17 4.3.1 Mode of Learning the Technology in use 19 4.3.2 Rate of Customers’ Response to Technology 19 4.4 Innovations and Business Processes in the Market 19 4.5 Product Innovations and Business Performance 21 4.5.1 Introduction of new Products 21 CHAPTER FIVE 24 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 5.1 Introduction 24 5.2 Summary 24 5.3 Conclusion 25 5.4 Recommendations 25 5.5 Recommendations for Further Research 26 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………27 APPENDICES 30 Appendix I- Questionnaire for sole Proprietors of Small Businesses at Gakoromone Market 30 Letter of Permit
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Study Population………………………………………………………………. 11
Table 3.2 Sample size……………………………………………………………………….... 12
Table 4.1: Rate of Questionnaire Return………………………………………………….….. 14
Table 4.2 Type of Business…………………………………………………………………… 15
Table 4.3 Age of Respondents……………………………………………………………….... 15
Table 4.4 Respondents’ Level of Education………………………………………………..…. 16
Table 4.5 Length of Operation in the Market……………………………………………….… 16
Table 4.6 Technology Adopted by the Respondents…………………………………………... 17
Table 4.7 Mode of Receiving Payments……………………………………………………..… 18
Table 4.8 Mode of Making Payments………………………………………………………..… 18
Table 4.9 Rate of Customers’ Response to Technology………………………………………... 19
Table 4.10 Services Offered by Traders………………………………………………………… 20
Table 4.11 Effect of Process Innovations on Business Performance…………………………… 20
Table 4.12 Hindrances to Business Process Innovations……………………………………….. 21
Table 4.13 Frequency of Introduction of new Products………………………………………… 22
Table 4.14 Effects of Product Innovations in Business…………………………………………. 22
Table 4.15 Hindrances to Introduction of new Products ………………………………………. 23
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework……………………………………………………………… 8
ABSTRACT
Financial innovations are the improvements businesses adopt to make their transactions easier, faster and more efficient. They may be in form of product innovations, process innovations, technological innovations, risk innovations, market innovations or any other new, innovative and creative ways businesses may invent to improve their transactions and practices. More innovations are likely to be introduced in business environments with higher competition. Financial innovations are significant for both large and small businesses. Sole proprietors adopt financial innovations in order to satisfy consumer needs, enhance their competitiveness in the market as well as attract new customers. This study was mainly meant to find out the impact of financial innovations on performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market. The objectives of the study sought to find out the significance of technological innovations on performance of sole proprietorships, to examine the extent to which product innovations are applied and how they influence the performance of sole proprietorships and to identify the process innovations applied by sole proprietors and how they influence performance of sole proprietorships. The literature was obtained from the relevant research journals, thesis and past research reports that had a bearing on financial innovations. Research shows that financial innovations have an impact on the performance of both large and small businesses but most sole proprietors have not yet adopted financial innovations. The study was carried out in Gakoromone market to try and find solutions to traders’ complains concerning low returns in their businesses. The population of the study included 250 sole proprietors who included 100 mitumba stall owners, 30 kiosk owners, 100 grocery stall owners and 20 cereal stall owners. The researcher used stratified random sampling to obtain a sample size of 50 respondents which comprised of 20 mitumba stall owners, 6 kiosk owners, 4 cereal shop owners and 20 grocery stall owners. Survey research design using descriptive approach was used whereby questionnaires for sole proprietors were used for collecting data. The questionnaires were checked for accuracy and consistency by carrying out a pilot study on 20 sole proprietors at Kianjai market. Corrections were done to ensure the questionnaires contained questions that would generate the required information from the respondents. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics where tables, frequencies and percentages were used to enhance summarizing of the research findings. From the study, it was established that there is a significant relationship between product innovation, process innovation and technological innovation and performance of sole proprietorships in Gakoromone market. The study found out that some sole proprietors at the market have adopted financial innovations and these significantly affect the performance of the businesses in the market. Businesses that have adopted financial innovations indicated better profits, better customer satisfaction and increased customer loyalty. These make the businesses have a competitive advantage over other businesses in the market. There is need for the county government of Meru to foster innovation amongst sole proprietors through introduction of civic education to enlighten the business owners on the existing innovations they should adapt. The financial institutions in the area may also come up with customized technologies that fit the traders’ needs. The researcher recommends further research to be done on other factors that affect performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market. Also, the researcher recommends research to include more variable than the three studied in this research topic
31
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
This chapter comprises of background to the study, statement of the problem, purpose of the study, study objectives and study questions. It also includes the scope of the study, limitations and delimitation, significance of the study and definition of operational terms.
Financial innovation refers to creating and then popularizing new financial instruments, technologies, institutions, markets, processes and business models, including the new application of existing ideas in a different market context. It is the advances over time in the financial instruments and payment system used in the lending and borrowing of funds. These advances include innovations in technologies, risk transfers and credit and equity generation. (Sanderson Abel, 2014).
Financial innovations enhance sustainability of institutions and their outreach to the poor. They are meant to provide ways of clearing and setting payment to facilitate trade, to provide mechanism for pooling of resources and for the subdividing of shares in various enterprises, to provide ways to transfer economics resources through time, across borders and among industries and provide ways of managing risks (Ross,1987).
With the economic transformation that has taken place in Zimbabwe over the last decade, it seems the financial services sectors and the stakeholders in the economy should embrace new innovations so that new economic structure such as Small Micro Enterprises (SMEs) and new farmers can access adequate funding through innovative financing mechanism, products and systems.
Process innovations cover the introduction of new business processes leading to increased efficiency, effectiveness, market expansion, customer loyalty and increased customer satisfaction leading to improved performance of business. It involves a business coming up with new processes not familiar to those of other businesses giving it a competitive advantage in the market place. A good example of this is the Japanese Just In Times (JIT) process that increases efficiency giving Japan a competitive advantage over other countries.
Product innovations involves the introduction of credit deposit that have not been in existence, hire purchase, leasing, and other financial products.These products are introduced to respond better to changes in market demand or to improve efficiency in the market. Ross (1987) developed a model in which new financial product must overcome marketing and distribution costs. According to Merton (1986), in the recent times, German firms that engaged in higher levels of product innovation were proving to be more profitable in the market.Aron and Lazeur (1990) presented a model in which new firms pursue risk averse strategies and are hence more likely to undertake more radical new research programmes and to introduce new products. Prusa and Schmite (1994) tested these theories by examining the introduction of new software products. The authors suggested that new firms appear to be more effective at creating new software categories, while established firms have comparative advantage in extending existing products lines.
Technological innovation refers to financial innovations that are driven by improvements in computer and telecommunication technology. For most people, the creation of ATM was a great financial innovation than asset backed securitization. Other types of financial innovations affecting the payment system include credit and debit cards and online systems like PayPal. The types of innovations are notable because they reduce transaction costs. Silber, (1975).
Risk innovation refers to the introductions of new ways and products to minimize business risks. Businesses come up with different ways to minimize risk for example, trading in different financial derivatives. Insurances firms also develop different products that assist firms minimize their risks.
The significance of financial innovations is widely recognized. Many leading scholars, including Miller (1986), have highlighted the importance of new product services in the financial arena. Empirically, Tafuno (1989) showed that of all public offerings in 1987, 18% consisted of security that had not been in existence in 1974. The innovations are not only vital for firms in the financial services industry, but also affect other companies; for example, enabling them to raise capital in larger amount and at lower cost than they could otherwise.
Every firm, whether big or small, is likely to benefit from financial innovation. Most large businesses have applied financial innovations and greatly benefitted as a result of minimizing costs as well as countering competition. Managers of these firms are committed to research, development and continued improvement of financial innovation to improve performance of their firms.
Despite this great progress in financial innovation by many firms in the economy, small and single individual owned businesses have been left out. Many single business owners are still ignorant of the possibility of applying financial innovations in their small businesses and benefitting from them. The researcher wanted to find out financial innovations appropriate for single individual owned businesses and their impact on the performance of these businesses and give recommendations thereafter.
The purpose of this study was to enlighten sole proprietors in small businesses on the existence and importance of financial innovation on their businesses. It was also meant to enable them understand that financial innovations are not only meant for big businesses but are important even to their small enterprises.
The study objectives are:-
1. To find out the significance of technological innovations on performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market.
2. To examine the extent to which product innovations are applied and how they influence the performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market.
3. To identify the process innovations applied by sole proprietors and how they influence performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market.
The study questions are:-
1. How do technological innovations influence the performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market?
2. To what extent do product innovations influence the performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market?
3. What process innovations are applied by sole proprietors at Gakoromone market and how do they influence performance of those businesses?
This study was conducted at Gakoromone market. It was meant to examine the impact of financial innovations on the performance of single individual owned businesses. The target population was the sole proprietors of individual owned shops, cereal shops, groceries and mitumba stalls in Gakoromone market.
1.7 Limitation and Delimitation
The researcher encountered problems when collecting data for this study. One challenge was language barrier since most of the owners of these single owned businesses are local people with low literacy levels. The researcher was therefore accompanied by a fellow student from the University who well understands the local language and is fluent in English language for reliable interpretation. Insecurity at Gakoromone market was also a challenge. The researcher disguised self to look like the locals to avoid being easily noticed.
This study focused only on the financial innovations for single individual owned businesses of shop owners, groceries, cereal shops and mitumba stalls sellers. Though there are other small businesses in the market, the focus of this research was only limited to single individual owned businesses discriminating the rest.
The findings of this study are likely to be of great benefit to small business owners, banks and investment marketers. This is because they are likely to bring awareness of other possible financial innovations that can be introduced in the market as well as bring about awareness to single individual owned business owners of existing and other financial innovations suitable for their businesses. The findings are also likely to trigger creativity and innovations of business owners as they try to think of innovations that can improve the performance of their businesses.
1.9 Definition of Operational Terms
Business premise: This phrase is used to refer to the single owned businesses at Gakoromone market i.e. small kiosks, groceries, cereal shops and mitumba stalls that are present during the period of the study.
Product line: this phrase is used to refer to the channels of distribution of items from single owned businesses in Gakoromone from the time they leave the business premises to the time they reach the final customer.
Sole proprietor: This phrase will be used to refer to individuals who own small businesses existing at Gakoromone market during the period of the study.
Sole proprietorships: this phrase is used in this project to refer to small businesses in Gakoromone market owned by one person during the period of the study.
CHAPTER TWO
2.1 Introduction
This chapter entails the impacts of product innovation on business performance, effects of technology on business performance and the impact of innovation on small businesses performance. It also includes the theoretical framework and the conceptual framework. The literature was obtained from the relevant research journals, thesis and past research reports that had a bearing on financial innovations.
2.2 Product Innovations on Business Performance
According to a study by Su and Vo (2010) to investigate the combined effects of market innovations on product innovation and company performance for small firms, a firm’s product as well as its quality can be improved upon when the firm focuses on product innovation. The owner’s innovativeness on product innovation permeates all variables in the model and has a positive influence in the market orientation, innovation and performance. Ngugi, Meorege and Muiru (2010) did a study focusing on the SMEs to find out the impact of product innovation on performance of small businesses in Kenya. Results from findings of their paper established that there is a relationship between performance of SMEs and product innovation.
The knowledge emanating from these two researchers shows that product innovations have an impact on performance of small firms. However, no study shows clearly how product innovations influence the performance of single individual owned businesses. The researcher conducted a research to show the details of how product innovations influence performance of single individual owned businesses at Gakoromone market.
2.3 Technological Innovation and Business Performance
Technological innovation can help a firm to build competitive advantage through making more competitive products and services and more efficient processes, or completely making a new business. In a study by Hao and Yu (2011) to analyze the impact of business’ technology selection on its innovation success and organization performance, they stated that technological capability enables a business to add value to the products and processes. Kimaru (2013) in his study examined that apart from technological capability a business also need technology management capability in managing technological resources effectively and efficiently. A business technology selection has an impact on innovation success which in turn has an impact on organization performance.
The above two studies both show that technological innovation is vital for the good performance of any business. However, the studies do not show to what extent technological innovation can be of importance to the performance of single individual owned businesses. The researcher therefore conducted a research on the extent to which technological innovation may be of importance to a sole proprietor.
2.4 The Impact of Innovation Technology on Small Business Performance
According to Lin, Ma and Xuan (2011) in their study of financial innovation, they found that innovation comprises of the element of new processes, new product and services and advance in technologies. Omondi (2013) states that innovation is an essential element for economic progress of a country and for the competitiveness of an industry. Kamau (2013) as well as Ketere (2014) states that technology play an important role not only to the large firms but also for small and medium enterprises. The knowledge emanating from these researches shows there is an agreement that innovation has an impact on the performance of both small and large enterprises. However, though these researches agree, no thorough research has been done to study the impacts of financial innovations specifically on single individual owned businesses. The studies above cover generally on small and medium enterprises. In this study, the researcher dwelled on single individual owned businesses and carried out a thorough research focusing on individual owned businesses at Gakoromone market.
2.5.1 Service Management Theory by Norman (1991)
This theory states that as the sales and revenues of a firm increase, the firms can increase their investments in activities that improve the attractiveness of their solutions. Most product or service can be differentiated from those of competitors through enhanced features, functionality, reliability and sustainability to the current and latent needs of the customers’ .It emphasizes on serving the individual customers. The variables of this theory are differentiation and customer satisfaction.
The variables of this theory are relevant to this study because differentiation of products will require the business to come up with differentiation of product, different from those of competitors thus bringing about product innovation. Also, in an attempt to achieve the objectives of these customer satisfaction a business will be required to come up with new technologies and processes that increase efficiency. This is an attempt to gain competitive advantage over the other firms. This leads the firms to adopt process innovation and technological innovation.
2.5.2 Traditional Theory of Financial Innovation by Sundbo (1997)
Sundbo suggested two paradigms based on the casual patterns, namely technology-economic paradigm and entrepreneur paradigm base on two different models of innovation process. The variable technology-economic paradigm emphasizes on the technological development as the core of the innovation process which was pegged on the random technology advancement. This paradigm may be the most adequate in explaining technological innovations. The variable is relevant to this study because it clearly explains the importance of technological innovation to small businesses.
Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework
Independent Variables Dependent Variables
Product Innovations
Performance of individual owned Businesses
Increased Profitability
Technological Innovations
Process Innovations
Source: - Modified from Ketere (2014)
This figure shows the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. Product innovation, technological innovation and process innovation are the independent variables influencing the performance of single individual owned businesses.
Applications of these innovations will impact on performance of single individual owned businesses by increasing the profitability of the business.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
This chapter focuses on the research methodology used for the study .It entails the study of design, study site, study population, sample techniques and sample size research instruments and piloting. It’s also covers data collection procedures and logistical ethical issues.
The study used survey research design using descriptive approach. Survey research has 3 distinguishing features used in the qualitative aspect of a given population which involves examining the relationship among variables, is subjective and uses a selected portion of the population which can be generalized. The approach was therefore appropriate for the study for it determines the relationship between the study dependent and independent variables hence it was possible to collect data from a large population and in cost effective way. The fact that this research design is subjective and uses a selected portion of the population which can be generalized enabled collection of data from a relatively large population acquiring the desired information in a cost effective way.
This study was conducted at Gakoromone market at Meru town. The researcher decided to conduct the study at this site after getting information on Daily Nation of sole proprietors complaining about low business returns. The County Government of Meru County also raised concerns of the need for civic education on how sole proprietors can improve their returns. These problems led to the researcher’s choice of this location.
The targeted population of this study was heterogeneous and comprised of 250 sole proprietors who own kiosks, cereal shops, mitumba and grocery stalls at Gakoromone market.
Table 3.1 Study Population
|
Category |
Target population |
|
Mitumba stalls owners |
100 |
|
Kiosks |
30 |
|
Cereal shops |
20 |
|
Grocery stalls |
100 |
|
Total |
250 |
Source: - Meru County Council register of traders
3.4 Sampling Techniques and sample Size
A stratified sampling technique was used in the study where population was divided into homogenous strata in order to get number of each category of individual owned businesses. Proportionate samples were acquired using the following formula:
(n / N) * R
Where n represented the size of strata, N represented the total population and R represented the required sample size.
Source: modified from Mwangi (2014)
Table 3.2 Sample size
|
Category |
Sample size |
|
Mitumba stalls |
20 |
|
Kiosks |
6 |
|
Cereal Shops |
4 |
|
Groceries |
20 |
|
Totals |
50 |
Source: - Meru County Council register of traders
The study used questionnaire to collect data and this questionnaire was used as follows:
3.5.1Questionnaire for sole proprietors of small businesses in Gakoromone market
Questionnaires were administered to the population. Since the population is heterogeneous, questionnaires enhanced data collection from a varied population in a cost effective and time saving manner. Bryman (1995) puts it that a questionnaire translates the research objectives into specific questions, and answers for each question will provide the data relevant for this research. The advantage of a questionnaire over other instruments includes: information can be collected over large samples, no opportunity for bias since it’s presented in paper form and saves on time. These advantages are of great importance in the study. The questionnaire was prepared in a way that all the study variables were well manipulated. It included questions that made respondents give their views on impacts of technological innovations, product innovation and process innovations on the performance of their businesses.
3.6 Piloting
A pre-test was carried out at Kianjai market to enhance adequacy and consistency of the questionnaire. After the pre-test, the questionnaire was refined, adding more relevant questions to incorporate needed data hence making them more functional.
Validity refers to the extent to which an instrument tests that which it is meant to measure (Mugenda and Mugenda, 2003).The validity of the questionnaires was established in order to make sure that they reflected the content of the study. The researcher went through the questionnaires and compared it with the set objectives to ensure it contained all the information that would answer the set questions and address the objectives. The supervisor’s and expert’s opinions were also consulted to scrutinize the relevance of the questionnaire to the study.
3.8 Data collection procedures
The researcher made copies of questionnaires and ensured they matched the targeted population. The researcher then travelled to Gakoromone market and issued questionnaires personally to the targeted respondents. Each respondent was issued with an envelope to protect the instruments from dirt and tear. After the respondents filled the questionnaires, the researcher collected them and counted them to ensure their reliability.
First the raw data was checked to ensure completeness during analysis. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics where tables, frequencies and percentages were used to enhance summarizing of the research findings in an understandable and meaningful way.
3.10 Logistical and Ethical issues
The researcher applied voluntary consent where the respondents were encouraged to participate in the study willingly and without coersion and undue influence. Those who participanted in the research were informed of all features of the research that are reasonably accepted to influence their willingness to participate voluntarily. The researcher also responded to any enquiries the participants made about the research.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Introduction
This study was about impact of financial innovations on the performance of sole proprietorships. It was carried out at Gakoromone market to find out if small business owners have adopted financial innovations and if these innovations have impacts on the performance of their businesses. The researcher carried out the research after finding out that small business owners were constantly complaining about poor returns in their businesses.
4.2 Rate of Questionnaire Return
The researcher distributed a total of 50 questionnaires. They were distributed as follows; mitumba stalls 20, kiosks 6, cereal shops 4 and groceries 20. The researcher obtained 88% of the questionnaires distributed due to the nature of small proprietorships where some businesses were indefinitely closed due to depletion of stock or other personal preferences of the sole entrepreneurs. The researcher distributed out the questionnaires to the respondents at noon and collected in the afternoon the same day. The following was the rate for questionnaire return:
Table 4.1: Rate of Questionnaire Return
|
Respondents |
No. of questionnaires distribute d |
No. of questionnaires returned |
Rate of return (%) |
|
Mitumba stall owners |
20 |
16 |
80 |
|
Kiosk owners |
6 |
6 |
100 |
|
Cereal shops |
4 |
4 |
100 |
|
Groceries |
20 |
18 |
90 |
|
Total |
50 |
44 |
88 |
Source: Fieldwork, February 2016.
Table 4.2 Type of Business
|
Type of business |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Mitumba stalls |
16 |
36.4 |
|
Kiosk owners |
6 |
13.6 |
|
Grocery stalls |
4 |
9.1 |
|
Cereal stalls |
18 |
40.9 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source: Fieldwork, February 2016.
The statistics show that of the questionnaires returned, 36.4% of the population includes mitumba stall owners, 13.6% includes kiosk owners, 40.9% includes cereal stall owners and 40.9% includes cereal stall owners.
Table 4.3 Age of Respondents
|
Age of respondents |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
20-35years |
10 |
22.7 |
|
36-45years |
20 |
45.5 |
|
45-60years |
10 |
22.7 |
|
Others |
4 |
9.1 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source: Fieldwork, February 2016.
The research shows that majority of the respondents i.e. 45.5% are in the age bracket of 36-45years.22.7% are between 20-35 years. Another 22.7% of the respondents are between 45-60years.only 9.1% of the respondents did not fit in any of the age brackets given. Further analysis of the questionnaires indicated that most of those who actively use financial innovations in their businesses are in the age bracket of 20-35years.
Table 4.4 Respondents’ Level of Education
|
Level of education |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Primary |
25 |
56.8 |
|
Secondary |
14 |
31.8 |
|
Tertiary |
4 |
11.4 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source: Fieldwork, February 2016.
The statistics show that 56.8% have primary education, 31.8% have secondary education and 11.4% have tertiary education.
Table 4.5 Length of Operation in the Market
|
Number of years |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Less than 1-3 years |
10 |
22.7 |
|
3-5 years |
15 |
34.1 |
|
5 or more years |
19 |
43.2 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source: Fieldwork, February 2016.
The research shows that 43.2% of the respondents have been in the market for more than five years, 31.4% for between 3-5 years and 22.7% for less than three years. Analysis of the questionnaires shows that those who have been in the market for longer periods have adopted financial innovations more.
4.3 Effects of Technology in Business
The researcher sought to identify the effects of technological innovations in business and obtained the findings as shown in tables 4.6, 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9.
Table 4.6 Technology Adopted by the Respondents
|
Type of technology |
Frequency |
Percentage% |
|
m-banking |
7 |
15.9 |
|
Lipa na M-pesa |
10 |
22.7 |
|
Both |
17 |
38.2 |
|
None |
10 |
22.7 |
Source: Fieldwork, February 2016.
The researcher sought to establish the types of technology adopted in Gakoromone market. The results obtained as shown in table 4.6 indicate that 15.9% of the respondents use M-banking, 22.7% use Lipa na M-pesa, 38.2% use both and 22.7% use none of the two.
Table 4.7 Mode of Receiving Payments
|
Mode |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Cash |
30 |
68.2 |
|
Lipa na M-pesa |
8 |
18.2 |
|
Mobile banking |
6 |
13.6 |
|
All |
34 |
77.3 |
Source: Fieldwork, Feb 2016.
The findings show that 68.2% of the respondents receive payments through cash, 13.6% had adopted mobile banking, 18.2% use Lipa na M-pesa and 77.3% indicated that they use any of the three modes of payment.
Table 4.8 Mode of Making Payments
|
Mode of payment |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Cash |
10 |
22.7 |
|
Lipa na M-pesa |
30 |
68.2 |
|
Mobile banking |
4 |
9.1 |
|
Others |
0 |
0 |
Source: Fieldwork, Feb 2016.
The researcher sought to establish the modes of payments respondents use in their transactions. 22.7% of the respondents indicated that they only use cash, 68.2% use Lipa na M-pesa and 9.1% use mobile banking in making payments. The respondents attributed high use of technology in making payments to the demands of their suppliers.
4.3.1 Mode of Learning the Technology in use
Regarding to how the respondents learnt about the technological innovations they apply in their bus
inesses, 50% of the respondents indicated that they learnt it thru media, 22.7% from their friends and relatives while 27.3% learnt it through promotion.
4.3.2 Rate of Customers’ Response to Technology
An analysis of the rate of customers’ response to technology was done. 86.4% of the respondents rated it as good, 11.4% of the respondents rated it as fair while only 2.2% considered it poor.this is shown on table 4.9
Table 4.9 Rate of Customers’ Response to Technology
|
Customers’ rate of response |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Good |
38 |
86.4 |
|
Fair |
5 |
11.4 |
|
Bad |
1 |
2.2 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source; fieldwork, February 2016
On enquiring if technology has positive or negative impacts on performance of businesses in the market, 97.7% agreed that technology has positive effects while only 2.3% disagreed.
4.4 Innovations and Business Processes in the Market
Data regarding process innovations in Gakoromone market was obtained through questionnaires and findings illustrated as shown in tables 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12.
Table 4.10 Services Offered by Traders
|
Service |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Delivery |
5 |
11.4 |
|
Packaging |
30 |
68.2 |
|
Both |
10 |
22.7 |
Source; fieldwork, February 2016
11.4% of the respondents offer delivery services, 68.2% offer packaging services and 22.7% indicated to offer both delivery and packaging services.
4.4.1 Effect of Process Innovations on Business Performance
The researcher intended to find out if these business innovations have an impact on the performance of businesses in the market
Table 4.11 Effect of Process Innovations on Business Performance
|
Enquiries |
Yes |
% |
No |
% |
|
If customers are influenced in any way by the services provided |
43 |
97.7 |
1 |
2.3 |
|
If there is a difference in profits when these services are offered and when not offered |
42 |
95.5 |
2 |
4.5 |
Source; fieldwork, February 2016
97.7% of the respondents that customers are influenced by these services while only 2.3% disagreed. Regarding profit differences when these services are offered and when they are not offered, 95.5% indicated that there are differences in profits in the two instances while only 4.5% disagreed. Thus, majority of the respondents noted that process innovations have an impact on the performance of sole proprietorships.
Table 4.12 Hindrances to Business Process Innovations
|
Hindrance |
Frequency |
Percentage% |
|
Lack of resources |
42 |
95.4 |
|
Lack of ideas |
1 |
2.3 |
|
Fear of loss |
1 |
2.3 |
|
Others |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source; fieldwork, February 2016
On analyzing the factors that hinder adoption of business process innovations in the market, 95.4% attributed it to lack of resources, 2.3% to lack of ideas and 2.3% to fear of loss this shows that majority of the sole proprietors are aware of the benefits of introduction of business process innovations and they will be willing to adopt them with availability of resources.
Majority of the respondents indicated that process innovations have positively impacted on their businesses and listed results such as increased profits, increased customer satisfaction and increased customer loyalty.
4.5 Product Innovations and Business Performance
Using questionnaires, the data on product innovations was obtained from the respondents’ responses and illustrated in tables 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15.
4.5.1 Introduction of new Products
The researcher wanted to know how often the sole proprietors introduce new products in their lines of business. 45.5% of the respondents indicated that they introduce new products more than once a year, 31.8% indicated they do it annually and 22.7% stated that they have never introduced new products in their businesses. This is illustrated in table 4.13
Table 4.13 Frequency of Introduction of new Products
|
Frequency of introduction |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
More than once per year |
20 |
45.5 |
|
Annually |
14 |
31.8 |
|
Never |
10 |
22.7 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source; fieldwork, February 2016
Table 4.14 Effects of Product Innovations in Business
|
Enquiry |
Yes |
% |
No |
% |
Others |
% |
|
If new products have a competitive advantage over common ones in the market |
38 |
86.4 |
5 |
11.4 |
1 |
2.2 |
|
If introduction of new products earns traders more profits |
42 |
95.6 |
1 |
2.2 |
1 |
2.2 |
Source; fieldwork, February 2016
86.4% of the respondents agreed that new products have a competitive advantage over the common goods in the market. Only 11.4% of the respondents thought otherwise.
95.6% of the respondents indicated that new products earn traders more profit in the marketonly 2.2% disagreed. This shows that introduction of new products has an impact on the performance of s ole proprietorships.
4.5.2 Hindrances to Introduction of new Products
On analyzing the factors that might be hindering product innovations 95.4% of the respondents attributed it to lack of capital, 2.3% to fear of loss and 2.3% to lack of ideas as shown in table 4.15
Table 4.15 Hindrances to Introduction of new Products
|
Factor |
Frequency |
Percentage % |
|
Lack of capital |
42 |
95.4 |
|
Fear of loss |
1 |
2.3 |
|
Lack of ideas |
1 |
2.3 |
|
Total |
44 |
100 |
Source; fieldwork, February 2016
Majority of the respondents said that they were planning to introduce new products in their lines of business in future to cater for the changes in market demand. This shows that the respondents agree that product innovations have an impact on the financial performance of sole proprietorships.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The study was about the impact of financial innovations on the performance of sole proprietorships in Gakoromone market. The objectives of the study focused on finding out the significance of technological innovations on the performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market, examining the extent to which product innovations are applied and how they influence the performance of sole proprietorships in the market. The objectives also sought to identify the process innovations applied by the traders and how they influence performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market.
The study endeavored to find out the significance of technological innovations on performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market. The study found out that the common types of technology used by traders in this market include mobile banking and Lipa na M-pesa. These types of technology are used both in making and receiving payments. Respondents indicated that they learnt about the technology they use mostly through media, friends or relatives and through promotion. When technology is adopted in a business, 86.4% of the respondents rated customers’ response as good, 11.4% rated it as fair and only 2.2% described it as poor. 97.7% of the respondents agreed that technology has positive effects on performance of sole proprietorships in the market while only 2.3% disagreed.
Regarding the extent to which product innovations are applied and how they influence the performance of sole proprietorships, the study found out that 45.5% of the respondents introduce new products in their business lines once per year, 31.8% do it annually while 22.7% have never introduced new products in their businesses. On analyzing factors that hinder product innovations, majority of the respondents i.e. 95.4% attributed it to lack of capital. This shows that the traders are aware of the benefits of product innovations. This was further supported by 86.4% of the respondents who agreed that new products have a competitive advantage over the common goods in the market. Also, 95.5%of the respondents indicated that new products earn traders more profits in the market.
The research also sought to identify the process innovations applied by traders at Gakoromone market and how they influence performance of their businesses. The study found ut that delivery and packaging services are offered by majority of the traders. 97.7% of the respondents indicated that customers are influenced by these business services. 95.5% agreed that there are differences in profits when these services are offered and when they are not offered. Thus, majority of the respondents agreed that business process innovations have an impact on the performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market.
There is a clear significance of technological innovations on the performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market. Use of technological innovations significantly influences business performance by increasing profits, customer satisfaction and improves customer loyalty.
Product innovations are used by sole proprietors though not to the extent that would yield maximum benefits. Product innovations when applied in a business have positive impact on the performance of the business.
The business processes used in Gakoromone market include delivery and packaging services. If these services are maximally applied by all the sole proprietors, they will improve the performance of these small businesses significantly.
From the findings , the study recommends that the county government of Meru should introduce civic education to enlighten the business owners on the importance of adopting different financial innovations in their businesses. The business owners also need to be guided on the different existing ways of securing finances to acquire capital to introduce financial innovations in their businesses. Different banks operating within the area should come up with customized technologies that fit the needs of these sole proprietors and at fair transaction costs. This will increase use of financial innovations and hence improve performance of businesses at Gakoromone market.
5.5 Recommendations for Further Research
The researcher suggests that further research be done considering other factors other than financial innovations that could influence the performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone market.
The researcher also suggests that the study should be developed to include more variables rather than the three included in this study and analyze how they influence performance of sole proprietorships at Gakoromone markets or in other markets.
REFERENCES
Akello, M.J. (2011). Determinants of Financial Innovation and their Impact on the Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya. Unpublished MBA project : University of Nairobi.
Anderson, A. (2009). Firm Performance: An Analysis from the Theory of Innovation. [Online], [Retrieved Oct 29, 2015] http://www.shinburne edu.au/lib/ir/online conferences /agse2015/00162.pdf]
Aron, D.J. & Lazear, P.E. (1990).The Introduction of new Products. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80, 421-426
Avgouleas, E. E. (2015). Regulating Financial Innovation. Oxford Handbook of Financial Regulation, 659-692.
Bodie, Z., & Brière, M. (January 01, 2011). Financing Future Growth: The Need for Financial Innovations. Oecd Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2011, 1, 141-144.
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (1995).Is the Resource based view a useful perspective for Strategic Management Research? The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40
Dess, G. & Lumpkin, S. (2014). Strategic management: Creating competitive advantages, global edition. Place of publication not identified: Mcgraw-Hill Inc, Us.
Bottom of Form
Hao, S. &Yu, B. (2011). The Impact of Technology Selection on Innovation Success and Organizational Performance, iBusiness, volume 3, pages 366-371
lgen, F. (January 01, 2015). Schumpeterian innovations, financial innovations and instability: An institutional perspective. Economies of Scale??a, 38, 106, 46-53.
Kamau, J, W. (2013). Effects of Technological Innovations at Equity Bank on Accessibility of Banking Services to Small Business Ventures in Nakuru County. Unpublished MBA Project: University of Nairobi
Ketere, K.S. (2014).The Effects of Financial Innovation on the Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya. Unpublished MBA Project: University of Nairobi
Kimaru, J.M. (2013).The Effects of Product Diversification on the Financial Performances on Microfinance Companies in Kenya. Unpublished MBA project: University of Nairobi.
Lin, C., Ma, Y., & Xuan, Y. (2011). Ownership Structure and Financial Constraints: Evidence from a Structural Estimation. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(2), 416-431.
Mbogo, M. & Ashika, A. (2005). Factors influencing product innovation in MFIs in Kenya. A case study of MFIs registered with the association of MFIs 3(1) 45-46
Merton, R.C. (1986). Financial Innovation and Economic Performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 4(4) 23-24
Miller. & Merton, H. “Financial Innovation: The last 20 years and the next.” Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Volume 13, spring 1982.pages 459-479
Mosoti, Z., & Masheka, B. (2010). Knowledge Management: The case of Kenya. The Journal of Language, Technology and Entrepreneurship in Africa. Downloaded from www.jlta.org
Mugenda, O.M. & Mugenda, G.A. (2003). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Laba graphics services printers.
Mwila, N. K. (January 01, 2013). Crowdsourcing in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises.
Ngugi, J.K. Meorege, M.O. & Muiru, J.M. (2010). The Influence of Innovativeness on the Growth of SMEs in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3(1), 26-29.
Nyaga, T. (2008). The Nature of Competition within Micro Finance Industry in Kenya. Unpublished MBA Project, University of Nairobi.
Omondi, O.H. (2013). The Effects of Technological innovations on the Financial Performance of the MFIs in Kenya. Unpublished MBA Project: University of Nairobi.
Pelly, R., & Krämer-Eis, H. (January 01, 2011). Creating a Better Business Environment for Financing Business, Innovation and Green Growth. Oecd Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2011, 1, 129-140.
Prusa, T.J. & Schmite, J.A. (1994). Can Companies Maintain their Initial Innovation Thrust? A study of the PC software industry. Review of the Economics and Statistics 76,523 540.
Ross, S.A. (1987). Institutional markets, Financial Marketing & Financial Innovation. Journal of Finance 44,541-556.
Sanderson, A. (2014). Financial Innovation and risk Sharing. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. London: prentice hall.
Silber, W.L. (1975). The Process of Financial Innovations. American economic review 3(1), 45-46.
Su, G., & Vo, H. (2010). The Relationship between Corporate Strategy, Capital Structure and firm Performance: An Empirical Study of the Listed Companies in Vietnam. Int. Res. J. Finance. Econ., ISSN 1450-2887 Issue 50.
Tafuno, P. (1989). Financial Innovations and First Mover Advantages. Journal of Financial Economics 25, 213-240.
Wyman, O. (2012). Rethinking of Financial Innovations: Reducing Negative Outcomes while Retaining the Benefits. World Economic Forum. Cologny: Geneva.
APPENDICES
Appendix I- Questionnaire for sole Proprietors of Small Businesses at Gakoromone Market
This questionnaire is meant to collect information relating to financial innovations for sole proprietorships in Gakoromone market. The information provided will be used for academic purposes only and will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Instructions
1. Please tick (√) appropriately in the spaces provided.
2. Answer all questions.
Introduction
1. What type of business do you own?
a) Mtumba stall [ ] b) kiosk [ ] c) cereal stall [ ] d) grocery [ ]
2. When did you start your business?
a) Less than 3years ago [ ] b) 3-5 years ago [ ] c) more than 5years ago [ ]
3. Select your age bracket.
a) 18-35 years [ ] b) 36-45 years [ ] c) above 45years [ ] d) others [ ]
4. Select your highest level of education.
a) Primary [ ] b) secondary [ ] c) tertiary [ ]
5. Highlight any improvements in your business from the time you started to date
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Technological Advancements in Business
6. What type of technology have you used in your business?
a) M-banking [ ] b) Lipa na M-pesa [ ] c) Both [ ] d) None [ ]
7. How do you receive payments from your customers?
a) Cash [ ] b) Lipa na M-pesa [ ] c) M-banking [ ] d) Others [ ] (specify)……………………………..
8. Through which mode of payment do you pay your suppliers?
b) a) Cash [ ] b) Lipa na M-pesa [ ] c) m-banking [ ] d) others [ ] (specify)…………………………….
9. If familiar with any technological mode of payment, how did you learn about it?
a) Media [ ] b) Friend/relative [ ] c) Promotion [ ]
10. How would you rate customers’ response to adoption of technology in payment?
a) Poor [ ] b) Fair [ ] c) Good [ ]
11. Do you think advancements in technology affect performance of businesses in the market?
a) Yes [ ] b) No [ ]
If yes, do they affect the performance positively or negatively?
a) Positively [ ] b) Negatively [ ]
12. How have technological advancements impacted on your business?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Product Innovations in the Market
13. How often do you introduce new products into your line of business?
a) more than once per year [ ] b) annually [ ]
c) Never [ ]
14. Do new products have a competitive advantage over the common ones when introduced in the market?
a) Yes [ ] b) No [ ]
15. Have you experienced any of your customers enquire for products or services not provided within the market?
a) Yes [ ] b) No [ ]
16. Does introduction of new products or services into the market earn traders more profit?
a) Yes [ ] b) No [ ]
17. What do you think hinders traders from introducing new products into the market?
a) Lack of capital [ ] b) Fear of loss [ ] c) Lack of ideas [ ] d) Other [ ] (specify)……………..
18. How are you planning to cater for changes in market demand?
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Innovations and Business Processes in the Market
19. What special services do you offer to ensure increased customer satisfaction?
a) Delivery services [ ] b) Packaging services [ ] c) None [ ] d) Others [ ] (specify)………………
20. Are customers influenced in any way by these extra services?
a) Yes [ ] b) No [ ]
21. Is there a difference in profits between when you offer such services and when you don’t?
a) Yes [ ] b) No [ ]
22. What do you think hinders traders in this market from introducing new unique business processes? a) Lack of capital [ ] b) Fear of loss [ ] c) Lack of ideas [ ] d) other [ ] (specify)……………..
23. Highlight any notable changes in business performance you experience when you offer these services to your customers …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………