|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
100.0 %Criteria
|
|
|
10.0 %Why Program was Chosen
|
No explanation given.
|
Explanation is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Explanation is complete and relevant.
|
Explanation is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Explanation is comprehensive and reflects higher-order thinking.
|
|
|
10.0 %Rationale for Implementation
|
No explanation given.
|
Explanation is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Explanation is complete and relevant.
|
Explanation is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Explanation is comprehensive and reflects higher-order thinking.
|
|
|
5.0 %Resources Needed
|
No resources are given.
|
Resources are incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Resources are complete and relevant.
|
Resources are relevant and comprehensive.
|
Resources are comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Costs
|
No costs are given.
|
Costs are incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Costs are complete and relevant.
|
Costs are relevant and comprehensive.
|
Costs are comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Implementation Times
|
No implementation times are given.
|
Implementation times are incomplete or unrealistic.
|
Implementations times are complete and realistic.
|
Implementation times are realistic and comprehensive.
|
Implementation times are comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Teacher Training Available
|
No teacher training information is given.
|
Teacher training information is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Teacher training information is complete and relevant.
|
Teacher training information is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Teacher training information is comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Research/data Supporting Success
|
No research/data supporting success is given.
|
Research/data supporting success is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Research/data supporting success is complete and relevant.
|
Research/data supporting success is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Research/data supporting success is comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
10.0 %Why Program was Chosen
|
No explanation given.
|
Explanation is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Explanation is complete and relevant.
|
Explanation is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Explanation is comprehensive and reflects higher-order thinking.
|
|
|
10.0 %Rationale for Implementation
|
No explanation given.
|
Explanation is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Explanation is complete and relevant.
|
Explanation is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Explanation is comprehensive and reflects higher-order thinking.
|
|
|
5.0 %Resources Needed
|
No resources are given.
|
Resources are incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Resources are complete and relevant.
|
Resources are relevant and comprehensive.
|
Resources are comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Costs
|
No costs are given.
|
Costs are incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Costs are complete and relevant.
|
Costs are relevant and comprehensive.
|
Costs are comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Implementation Times
|
No implementation times are given.
|
Implementation times are incomplete or unrealistic.
|
Implementations times are complete and realistic.
|
Implementation times are realistic and comprehensive.
|
Implementation times are comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Teacher Training Available
|
No teacher training information is given.
|
Teacher training information is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Teacher training information is complete and relevant.
|
Teacher training information is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Teacher training information is comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Research/data Supporting Success
|
No research supporting success is given.
|
Research supporting success is incomplete or irrelevant.
|
Research supporting success is complete and relevant.
|
Research supporting success is relevant and comprehensive.
|
Research supporting success is comprehensive and insightful.
|
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are present.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
|
No references are included. No citations are used.
|
References are present. Citations are inconsistently used. Many of the sources are outdated.
|
References are included and list sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Most of the sources are up-to-date or timeless.
|
References are present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. Most of the sources are up-to-date or timeless.
|
In-text citations and references are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. All of the sources are up-to-date or timeless.
|
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|
MERTON BRUCE
1st_assignment_1.docx
