Managerial Finance
1
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND PROPOSAL
Financial Analysis of Google and Competitor Microsoft
The purpose of this paper is to provide a financial analysis and proposal of the power technology giant Google Inc. and its competitor Microsoft. In addition this paper will delineate the Management’s Discussion and Analysis for both companies parallel to its pro-forma financial statements that capture a five year period. Of importance, the approaches that are applied by both companies and exploration of the ratio analysis of the pro-forma financial statements.
Review of Management’s Discussion and Review
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) highlights management’s standpoint on the financial performance and business health of the company. Of note it a requisite that U.S. publicly held companies is commanded by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to supply the MD&As which comprise a discussion of the operations in detail about the company relating recent period as opposed to previous period (Investopedia, 2016).
In the previous paper the Financial Analysis of companies Google and Microsoft have been outlined. Each company has had their overall business and operating characteristics, product service, customers, goals and strategies, market position, and general risk factors all that are discussed in the MD&A.
Google documented a net revenue of 75 billion dollars which exceeded their previous year 66 billion dollars. Of note the company Google recorded a revenue progression of 14 percent over previous year, perpetual revenue progression of 20 percent year over year (SEC Google Inc., 2016). They anticipate to maintain this growth and to take on investments ventures that will be advantageous to both buyers and sellers in the long term.
Contrastingly Microsoft revenue augmented 2.7 billion or 16 percent replicating an increased product costs. Additionally, revenue increased predominantly as a result of robust sales of products and services. The generated net revenue for Microsoft in 2015 was 93 billion which increase since previous years (Statista, 2016).
Pro Forma Financial Statements
A Pro Forma financial statement is a financial statement draft on the concept of assumed events and transaction (Brigham, 2014). Please refer to attachment A for Pro Forma statement of the company Google and Microsoft over a five span.
Current Strategies to Achieve Higher ROI
The tactics and approach for Google are to expand and position their brands within diverse marketplace globally. In recent years Google have established enhanced campaigns which is profoundly changing the environment of digital advertising by combing tablets, smart phones and other mobile devices. With this introduction by Google they have seen an increase by 3 percent in the trend of digital search via mobile phones. These percentages are likely to increase as advertisers continue to use this medium to advertise their business.
At the other end of the spectrum Microsoft aims and strategies are to expand their digital marketing by reaching new customers on a large scale. In addition to continue to create and offer quality products and services. With the recent procurement of Nokia’s devices and services to form Microsoft Mobile Oy, Microsoft have repositioned their brand in the smartphone marketplace (Microsoft, 2016).
Ratio Analysis
According to Brigham (2014) ratio analysis is the quantifiable financial information from a company’s financial statements. Of paramount importance these ratios are fundamental in providing input to evaluate and relate companies with each other.
Refer to Attachment A for companies Google Inc. and Microsoft Corporation ratio analysis.
Future profitability and competitive performance
For almost a decade Google has been one the most widely used search engine in the digital marketplace globally with a market segment of 53.6 percent. The company Google Inc. recently procure phone hardware giant Motorola for an overall total of 12.5 billion dollars. Presently it foremost mission is to knock the IPhone from Apple out of the digital marketplace with the introduction of their newest cutting edge technology android smartphones.
Correlating Google with Microsoft performance in 2015, the two companies have a profit variation. Microsoft total profits is generated from engineering software, supplying quality services and products at a competitive cost. Contrastingly Google lock a gross profit from successful digital services and advertising used by billions of Google customers. The blend of Microsoft and social networking icon Facebook now stands as a significant risk for Google. In recent years Facebook and Microsoft broadcast they are now business partners. Of note this business merger generates an added competition and concern for Google. Notably Google control 72.15 percent of all digital searches in the United States in current years (Latif, Hassan, Latif, Rasheed & Yousef, 2011).
References
Brigham, E. E. (2014). Financial Management: Theory and Practice 14th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western.
Investopedia. (2016). Management Discussion and Analysis & Financial Statement. Retrieved July 31, 2016 from http://www.investopedia.com/exam-guide/cfa-level-1/financial-statements/management-analysis-footnotes.asp#ixzz4G2wVjLA5
Latif, M, Hassan, M., Latif, A., Rasheed, I., & Yousaf, U. (2011). The Financial Performance Analysis of Google Inc. V/S Industry Technology. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. Vol. 5. No.17. Retrieved July 31, 2015 from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/266739629_The_Financial_Performance_Analysis_of_Google_Inc._VS_Industry_Technology.
Microsoft. (2016). Retrieved July 31, 2016 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/
Statista. (2016). Microsoft Corporation. Retrieved July 31, 2016 http://www.statista.com/statistics/272747/net-profit-by-quarter-of-the-microsoft-corporation/
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (SEC). (2016). Google Inc. Retrieved July 31, 2016 from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000165204416000012/goog10-k2015.htm
Thank you for your submission. However, I will suggest you derive a better way of presenting your ratio analysis that it will not take this much space. And you want to discuss the ratios in one or two paragraphs aside from showing the numbers. You have a few grammatical errors to correct against your next submission. You have included the elements required by the assignment instruction.
ATTACHMENT A.
Google Inc.
|
Fiscal year |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,604 |
2,201 |
1,393 |
1,665 |
1,998 |
2,357 |
2,781 |
3,199 |
|
|
Receivables |
12,428 |
14,957 |
16,582 |
20,177 |
24,213 |
28,571 |
33,714 |
38,771 |
|
|
Investments |
196 |
31 |
2,348 |
2,348 |
2,348 |
2,348 |
2,348 |
2,348 |
|
|
Property and equipment |
858 |
922 |
1,344 |
1,585 |
1,902 |
2,245 |
2,649 |
3,046 |
|
|
Goodwill |
3,187 |
3,189 |
4,069 |
4,069 |
4,069 |
4,069 |
4,069 |
4,069 |
|
|
Other intangible assets |
258 |
156 |
358 |
444 |
533 |
629 |
742 |
853 |
|
|
Other assets |
629 |
461 |
2,787 |
1,110 |
1,332 |
1,571 |
1,854 |
2,132 |
|
|
Total assets |
19,160 |
21,917 |
28,881 |
31,398 |
36,394 |
41,790 |
48,157 |
54,419 |
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowing |
1,103 |
1,093 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Payables and accrued expenses |
10,158 |
12,190 |
13,617 |
14,427 |
17,312 |
20,167 |
23,642 |
27,011 |
|
|
Taxes payable |
37 |
29 |
32 |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
1,505 |
1,505 |
1,505 |
1,505 |
1,505 |
1,505 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
472 |
357 |
(32) |
444 |
533 |
629 |
742 |
853 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
11,770 |
13,669 |
15,122 |
16,431 |
19,350 |
22,300 |
25,889 |
29,369 |
|
|
Stockholders' equity (balancing figure) |
7,390 |
8,248 |
13,759 |
14,967 |
17,044 |
19,490 |
22,269 |
25,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
19,160 |
21,917 |
28,881 |
31,398 |
36,394 |
41,790 |
48,157 |
54,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (% of Sales) |
23.8% |
27.4% |
15.1% |
15% |
15% |
15% |
15% |
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables turnover |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0.56 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments (remain constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment (asset turnover) |
7.84 |
8.70 |
6.88 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (remain constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets (% of sales) |
3.8% |
1.9% |
3.9% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (% of sales) |
9.4% |
5.7% |
30.1% |
10.0% |
10.0% |
10.0% |
10.0% |
10.0% |
|
Short-term borrowing (remains constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables turnover |
0.43 |
0.43 |
0.46 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes payable (% of sales) |
0.6% |
0.4% |
0.3% |
0.5% |
0.5% |
0.5% |
0.5% |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes (remains constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (% of sales) |
7.0% |
4.4% |
-0.3% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is anticipated that the gap in balance sheet will be meet by equity financing and company will raise additional equity either through follow-up offer or through strategic sale.
|
Fiscal Year |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
|
Revenue |
5,662 |
6,727 |
8,025 |
9,248 |
11,098 |
13,317 |
15,714 |
18,543 |
21,324 |
|
% Growth |
|
18.8% |
19.3% |
15.2% |
20% |
20% |
18% |
18% |
15% |
|
Technology and occupancy |
677 |
727 |
890 |
947 |
1,221 |
1,465 |
1,886 |
2,596 |
3,412 |
|
% of Sales |
12.0% |
10.8% |
11.1% |
10.2% |
11% |
11% |
12% |
14% |
16% |
|
Advertising and promotion |
662 |
791 |
998 |
985 |
1,332 |
1,598 |
1,571 |
1,854 |
2,132 |
|
% of Sales |
11.7% |
11.8% |
12.4% |
10.7% |
12% |
12% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
|
Nonrecurring expense |
19 |
|
|
48 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
% of Sales |
0.3% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.5% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Other expenses |
3042 |
3665 |
4353 |
5199 |
6,104 |
7,324 |
8,643 |
9,735 |
10,662 |
|
% of Sales |
53.7% |
54.5% |
54.2% |
56.2% |
55% |
55% |
55% |
53% |
50% |
|
Total operating expenses |
4,400 |
5,183 |
6,241 |
7,179 |
8,656 |
10,387 |
12,100 |
14,185 |
16,206 |
|
% of Sales |
77.7% |
77.0% |
77.8% |
77.6% |
78.0% |
78.0% |
77.0% |
76.5% |
76.0% |
|
EBIDTA |
1,262 |
1,544 |
1,784 |
2,069 |
2,441 |
2,930 |
3,614 |
4,358 |
5,118 |
|
% of Sales |
22.3% |
23.0% |
22.2% |
22.4% |
22.0% |
22.0% |
23.0% |
23.5% |
24.0% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
382 |
453 |
516 |
608 |
721 |
866 |
1,021 |
1,205 |
1,386 |
|
% of Sales |
6.7% |
6.7% |
6.4% |
6.6% |
6.5% |
6.5% |
6.5% |
6.5% |
6.5% |
|
Operating income |
880 |
1091 |
1268 |
1461 |
2,441 |
2,930 |
3,614 |
4,358 |
5,118 |
|
% of Sales |
15.5% |
16.2% |
15.8% |
15.8% |
22.0% |
22.0% |
23.0% |
23.5% |
24.0% |
|
Total nonoperating income, net |
11 |
-7 |
-7 |
27 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
% of Sales |
0.2% |
-0.1% |
-0.1% |
0.3% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Income before taxes |
891 |
1084 |
1261 |
1488 |
2,441 |
2,930 |
3,614 |
4,358 |
5,118 |
|
% of Sales |
15.7% |
16.1% |
15.7% |
16.1% |
22.0% |
22.0% |
23.0% |
23.5% |
24.0% |
|
Provision for income taxes |
113 |
129 |
842 |
260 |
488 |
586 |
723 |
872 |
1,024 |
|
% of PBT |
12.7% |
11.9% |
66.8% |
17.5% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
|
Net income |
778 |
955 |
419 |
1228 |
1,953 |
2,344 |
2,891 |
3,486 |
4,094 |
|
% of Sales |
13.7% |
14.2% |
5.2% |
13.3% |
17.6% |
17.6% |
18.4% |
18.8% |
19.2% |
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
0.31 |
1.00 |
1.59 |
1.91 |
2.35 |
2.84 |
3.33 |
|
Diluted outstanding shares |
|
|
1,262 |
1,229 |
1,229 |
1,229 |
1,229 |
1,229 |
1,229 |
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
|
Fiscal Year |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
|
Revenue |
203 |
552 |
850 |
1267 |
1,901 |
2,851 |
3,849 |
5,003 |
6,254 |
|
% Growth |
|
171.9% |
54.0% |
49.1% |
50% |
50% |
35% |
30% |
25% |
|
Cost of Revenue |
139 |
424 |
624 |
897 |
1,283 |
1,853 |
2,502 |
3,002 |
3,440 |
|
% of Sales |
68.5% |
76.8% |
73.4% |
70.8% |
68% |
65% |
65% |
60% |
55% |
|
Gross Profit |
64 |
128 |
226 |
370 |
618 |
998 |
1347 |
2001 |
2814 |
|
% of Sales |
31.5% |
23.2% |
26.6% |
29.2% |
32.5% |
35.0% |
35.0% |
40.0% |
45.0% |
|
Research and development |
47 |
74 |
145 |
145 |
209 |
314 |
423 |
550 |
688 |
|
% of Sales |
23.2% |
13.4% |
17.1% |
11.4% |
11% |
11% |
11% |
11% |
11% |
|
Sales, General and administrative |
100 |
149 |
213 |
371 |
523 |
784 |
962 |
1,251 |
1,563 |
|
% of Sales |
49.3% |
27.0% |
25.1% |
29.3% |
28% |
28% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
|
Other expenses |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
% of Sales |
0.0% |
0.4% |
0.1% |
0.2% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
|
Total operating expenses |
147 |
225 |
359 |
518 |
734 |
1,100 |
1,389 |
1,806 |
2,258 |
|
% of Sales |
72.4% |
40.8% |
42.2% |
40.9% |
38.6% |
38.6% |
36.1% |
36.1% |
36.1% |
|
EBIDTA |
(83) |
(97) |
(133) |
(148) |
(116) |
(103) |
(42) |
195 |
557 |
|
% of Sales |
-40.9% |
-17.6% |
-15.6% |
-11.7% |
-6.1% |
-3.6% |
-1.1% |
3.9% |
8.9% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
3 |
8 |
18 |
27 |
38 |
57 |
77 |
100 |
125 |
|
% of Sales |
1.5% |
1.4% |
2.1% |
2.1% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
|
Operating income |
(86) |
(105) |
(151) |
(175) |
(154) |
(160) |
(119) |
95 |
432 |
|
% of Sales |
-42.4% |
-19.0% |
-17.8% |
-13.8% |
-8.1% |
-5.6% |
-3.1% |
1.9% |
6.9% |
|
Other income (expense) |
0 |
1 |
-2 |
-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
% of Sales |
0.0% |
0.2% |
-0.2% |
-0.2% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Income before taxes |
(86) |
(104) |
(153) |
(177) |
(154) |
(160) |
(119) |
95 |
432 |
|
% of Sales |
-42.4% |
-18.8% |
-18.0% |
-14.0% |
-8.1% |
-5.6% |
-3.1% |
1.9% |
6.9% |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
1 |
1 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
% of PBT |
0.0% |
-1.0% |
-0.7% |
-2.3% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Net income |
(86) |
(105) |
(154) |
(181) |
(154) |
(160) |
(119) |
95 |
432 |
|
% of Sales |
-42.4% |
-19.0% |
-18.1% |
-14.3% |
-8.1% |
-5.6% |
-3.1% |
1.9% |
6.9% |
|
Preferred dividend |
|
|
|
32 |
32 |
32 |
32 |
32 |
32 |
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
(86) |
(105) |
(154) |
(213) |
(186) |
(192) |
(151) |
63 |
400 |
|
Fiscal year |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
166 |
225 |
471 |
665 |
713 |
770 |
750 |
938 |
|
|
Receivables |
2 |
2 |
5 |
11 |
16 |
21 |
28 |
35 |
|
|
Inventories |
1 |
3 |
12 |
38 |
57 |
77 |
100 |
125 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
3 |
5 |
7 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
Other current assets |
81 |
175 |
211 |
475 |
713 |
962 |
1,251 |
1,563 |
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
52 |
64 |
87 |
127 |
168 |
192 |
200 |
250 |
|
|
Goodwill |
1 |
40 |
57 |
57 |
57 |
57 |
57 |
57 |
|
|
Intangible assets |
1 |
10 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
|
|
Other assets |
12 |
17 |
18 |
38 |
57 |
77 |
100 |
125 |
|
|
Total assets |
319 |
541 |
895 |
1,449 |
1,821 |
2,195 |
2,518 |
3,127 |
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables and accrued expenses |
33 |
39 |
70 |
134 |
197 |
259 |
321 |
380 |
|
|
Deferred revenues |
- |
- |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
97 |
152 |
257 |
475 |
713 |
962 |
1,251 |
1,563 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
- |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
27 |
46 |
27 |
48 |
71 |
96 |
125 |
156 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
157 |
267 |
387 |
690 |
1,014 |
1,351 |
1,729 |
2,133 |
|
|
Stockholders' equity (balancing figure) |
162 |
274 |
508 |
759 |
807 |
844 |
789 |
994 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
319 |
541 |
895 |
1,449 |
1,821 |
2,195 |
2,518 |
3,127 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (as % of sales) |
81.8% |
40.8% |
55.4% |
35% |
25% |
20% |
15% |
15% |
|
|
Receivables turnover |
102 |
276 |
170 |
180 |
180 |
180 |
180 |
180 |
|
|
Inventories turnover |
139 |
141 |
52 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses (as % of sales) |
1.5% |
0.9% |
0.8% |
0.60% |
0.50% |
0.30% |
0.10% |
0.10% |
|
|
Other current assets (as % of sales) |
39.9% |
31.7% |
24.8% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
|
|
Assets turnover |
3.90 |
8.63 |
9.77 |
15.00 |
17.00 |
20.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
|
|
Goodwill (Remain constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets (remain constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (as % of sales) |
5.9% |
3.1% |
2.1% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
|
|
Payable Turnover |
8.67 |
16.64 |
14.04 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
|
|
Deferred revenues (Remain Constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (as % of Sales) |
47.8% |
27.5% |
30.2% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
|
|
Long-term debt (remain constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities (as % of sales) |
13.3% |
8.3% |
3.2% |
3% |
3% |
3% |
3% |
3% |
|
RATIOS
|
Fiscal Year |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
|
Revenue Growth - Google |
|
18.8% |
19.3% |
15.2% |
20.0% |
20.0% |
18.0% |
18.0% |
15.0% |
|
Revenue Growth - Microsoft |
|
171.9% |
54.0% |
49.1% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
35.0% |
30.0% |
25.0% |
|
3-Yr CAGR trend - Google |
|
|
|
17.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Yr CAGR trend - Microsoft |
|
|
|
84.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-Yr CAGR Forecast - Google |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2% |
|
5-Yr CAGR Forecast - Microsoft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit Growth - Google |
|
24.0% |
16.2% |
15.2% |
17.7% |
20.0% |
25.6% |
21.6% |
18.4% |
|
Operating Profit Growth - Microsoft |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Net Profit Growth - Google |
|
22.8% |
-56.1% |
193.1% |
12.1% |
20.0% |
25.6% |
21.6% |
18.4% |
|
Net Profit Growth - Microsoft |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
EBITDA margin - Google |
22.3% |
23.0% |
22.2% |
22.4% |
22.0% |
22.0% |
23.0% |
23.5% |
24.0% |
|
EBITDA margin - Microsoft |
-40.9% |
-17.6% |
-15.6% |
-11.7% |
-6.1% |
-3.6% |
-1.1% |
3.9% |
8.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Margin - Google |
15.5% |
16.2% |
15.8% |
15.8% |
15.5% |
15.5% |
16.5% |
17.0% |
17.5% |
|
Operating Margin - Microsoft |
-42.4% |
-19.0% |
-17.8% |
-13.8% |
-8.1% |
-5.6% |
-3.1% |
1.9% |
6.9% |
|
Net Margin - Google |
13.7% |
14.2% |
5.2% |
13.3% |
12.4% |
12.4% |
13.2% |
13.6% |
14.0% |
|
Net Margin - Microsoft |
-42.4% |
-19.0% |
-18.1% |
-16.8% |
-9.8% |
-6.7% |
-3.9% |
1.3% |
6.4% |
|
Receivable Turnover -Google |
|
0.54 |
0.54 |
0.56 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
|
Receivable Turnover - Microsoft |
|
101.50 |
276.00 |
170.00 |
180.00 |
180.00 |
180.00 |
180.00 |
180.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover - Google |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Inventory Turnover - Microsoft |
|
139.00 |
141.33 |
52.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable Turnover - Google |
|
0.43 |
0.43 |
0.46 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
|
Payable Turnover - Microsoft |
|
8.67 |
16.64 |
14.04 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Turnover - Google |
|
7.84 |
8.70 |
6.88 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
|
Asset Turnover - Microsoft |
|
3.90 |
8.63 |
9.77 |
15.00 |
17.00 |
20.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Assets - Google |
|
5.0% |
1.9% |
4.3% |
4.4% |
4.5% |
5.0% |
5.2% |
5.5% |
|
Return on Assets - Microsoft |
|
-32.9% |
-28.5% |
-23.8% |
-12.8% |
-10.5% |
-6.9% |
2.5% |
12.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Investments - Google |
|
12.8% |
13.6% |
10.6% |
11.5% |
12.2% |
13.4% |
14.2% |
15.0% |
|
Return on Investments - Microsoft |
|
-64.8% |
-49.7% |
-34.4% |
-20.3% |
-19.8% |
-14.1% |
12.0% |
43.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Equity - Google |
|
12.9% |
5.1% |
8.9% |
9.2% |
9.7% |
10.7% |
11.4% |
12.0% |
|
Return on Equity - Microsoft |
|
-64.8% |
-56.2% |
-41.9% |
-24.5% |
-23.7% |
-17.9% |
8.0% |
40.2% |